DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
JRE
Docket No: 5491-00
16 October 2001
This is in reference to your request for further consideration of your
correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10
Code, section 1552.
application for
of the United States
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 20 September 2001. Your allegations of error and
injustice concerning the characterization of your discharge were reviewed in accordance with
administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with
all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this regard, the Board affirmed its previous determination that your service was
properly characterized by a discharge under other than honorable conditions, in view of your
multiple acts of misconduct, for which you received nonjudicial punishment of six occasions.
Your contention that one of your periods of absence without authority occurred after your
mother’s house burned down was carefully considered, but found insufficient to warrant the
correction of your record to show that you were discharged by reason of hardship rather than
misconduct/frequent involvement of a discreditable nature with military authorities.
Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the
panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be
taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new
and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official
In this
records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the
burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 10836-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 July 2010. The discharge authority directed an other than honorable discharge by reason of misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00607-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 February 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06554-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 September 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04971-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 July 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03350-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 May 2002. your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02585-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 March 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The discharge authority directed an other than honorable discharge by reason of Misconduct.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04192-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 June 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code‘when an individual is discharged due to misconduct. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 00470-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 September 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The discharge authority directed an other than honorable discharge by reason of misconduct.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00647-01
A three-member panel for the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 June 2001. Since you were treated no differently than others discharged under similar circumstances, the Board could find no error or injustice in your assigned reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00505-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 May 2003. Applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is discharged by reason of misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.