Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05504-00
Original file (05504-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAW ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

LCC:ddj
Docket No: 5504-00
24 October 2000

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 24 October 2000.
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1070 PERS  
of which is attached.

In addition, the Board considered the advisory

Your allegations of error and injustice

312E/25  of 15 September 2000, a copy

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
  The names and votes of
the advisory opinion.
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

Accordingly, your application has been denied.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Consequently,

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT 

OF THE NAV

Y

NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND

5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE

MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000

From: Commander Navy Personnel Command
To:
Via: Assistant, Board for Correction of Naval Records (Pers-OOZCB)

Executive Director, Board for Correction of Naval Records

Ref:

(a) BCNR Docket Number 5504-00

1. Reference (a) is disapproved. In our opinion member ’s service record does not support the
fact that Cebu, Philippines was the home of record at the time he reported for active duty on
1 April 1988. His record shows Ewa, Hawaii as the home of record, and the he established
residence in the United States in 7 September 1985.

5



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04810-00

    Original file (04810-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 October 2000. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04963-00

    Original file (04963-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00405-00

    Original file (00405-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 October 2000. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. briefing official where the alleged miscounseling occurred stating he provided incorrect information during his brief, a more favorable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04291-00

    Original file (04291-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 October 2000. In this regard, it is important Consequently, Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAW l IRSOWWLL COMMAND DRIVE IlTlDRltY 5720 YlLLlNDTOlT11 2805 5-0000 MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Via: PERS-OOZCB Subj: BCNR PETITION ICO 116 0 PERS-815 29 Aug 00 Ref: SNM's DD Form 149 dtd...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04627-00

    Original file (04627-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 October 2000. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Reference (b) allowed Veterans Educational Assistance Program (VEAP)...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02104-00

    Original file (02104-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 N of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Enclosure (1) indicates a request to reinstate all pay and allowances due to a negative leave balance that occurred during the petitioner's continuation of active duty for special work orders with less than 24 hours...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03895-00

    Original file (03895-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 October 2000. Recommend the Board deny STS3 equest to add Reference Navy College Fund (NCF) Program enlistment guarantee to his master record. enlistment bonus are not eligible for the NCF Program.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07339-00

    Original file (07339-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 March 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The petitioner completed CT0 "A" school training in November 2000. for the Reference (b) provided a zone "B" SRB entitlement CTO(OOO0) rate: there...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00765-00

    Original file (00765-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Legislated Educational Benefit Programs is determined by the member's initial entry onto active dut educational program available to SKC active duty on 18 June 1984 was the Veterans' Educational Assistance Program (VEAP). A review of SKC -record indicates he did not enroll in VEAP before the legislated deadlines and is not eligible...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03819-00

    Original file (03819-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NAVSUPSYSCMD memorandum 4050 SER 2000, a copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.