DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FORCORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
TRG
Docket No: 5517-01
15 November 2001
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the United
States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 14 November 2001.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
Your allegations of error and
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
You enlisted in the Navy on 29 June 1984 at age 19.
shows that you received nonjudicial punishment on two occasions
and were convicted by a summary court-martial.
Your offenses
were drunk driving, destruction of government property, and
damaging two private vehicles by throwing items out of a barracks
You were released from active duty on 13 May 1988 with
window.
your service characterized as honorable.
acknowledged that you were not recommended for reenlistment and
were assigned an
issued an honorable discharge at the end of your military
obligation.
RR-4 reenlistment code.
Subsequently, you were
At that time, you
The record
In your application you state that you are a member of the
National Guard and desire a change in the reenlistment code so
you can enter active duty in the Army.
The Board concluded that the three disciplinary actions were
sufficient to support the assignment of the
code, and a change in that code was not warranted.
your application has been denied.
members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
The names and votes of the
RR-4 reenlistment
Accordingly,
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
2
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04961-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 November 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. these factors and contention were not sufficient to warrant a However, the Board concluded change in your reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01349-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370.510 0 TRG Docket No: 1349-01 11 July 2001 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the United States Code section 1552. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 July 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04344-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. November 1988. reenlistment and were assigned an At that time, you were not recommended for RR-4 reenlistment code. The Board concluded that two consecutive adverse performance evaluations were sufficient to support the assignment of the RE-4 reenlistment code.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05569-01
At that time you were assigned an RR-4 You state in your application that since discharge you have attended weight management and nutrition courses and are now within weight standards. Finally, the Board noted the adverse marks in two categories in the last performance evaluation and The Board that you were not recommended for advancement. believed that despite the excellent comments concerning your performance of duty, the adverse marks and comments meant that a recommendation for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07912-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 October 2001. injustice were regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. record, and you have submitted none, to show that your actions while in recruit training were not as described in the psychiatric evaluation or that the diagnosis was not supported by the history and other information presented to the psychologist. Consequently,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05451-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Subsequently, the separation authority directed an entry level separation by reason of erroneous enlistment, September 1999. reenlistment and were assigned an RR-4 reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05397-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Based on the period of unauthorized absence, you were processed for an administrative discharge by reason of misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05482-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 November 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. following an NJP for drug abuse, for an administrative discharge, processing in the record. As indicated, there is no evidence that the commanding...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01925-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 July 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. Since you have been treated no differently than others separated from the Navy for that reason, the Board could not find an error or injustice in the assignment of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07388-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 February 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. Subsequently, you were diagnosed with a severe At that time you Based on the diagnosed personality disorder, you were processed for an administrative discharge. ...