Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05507-01
Original file (05507-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

BJG
Docket No: 5507-01
4 October 2001

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. You requested that your
captain date of rank and effective date be adjusted to reflect selection by the Fiscal Year (FY)
1999 Captain Selection Board, vice the FY 2000 Captain Selection Board. You also
impliedly requested removing your failure by the FY 1999 Captain Selection Board.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 3 October 2001. ‘Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board
consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your
naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board
considered the advisory opinions furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, dated 10 and
14 August 2001, copies of which are attached.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained
in the advisory opinions. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be
taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard,
important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.

and
it is

Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the
applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

*

Enclosures

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS
MANPOWER AND RESERVE AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT

AARRY LEE HALL, 17 LEJEUNE ROAD

QUANTICO, VIRGINIA 22134-5104

IN REPLY REFER TO:

1412/2
MMPR
10 

AUE 

2001

MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF

NAVAL RECORDS

Subj :

BCNR APPLICATION IN THE CASE OF CAPTAIN

USMC

Ref:

(a) MMER Route Sheet of 1 Aug 01

Reference (a) requested an advisory opinion in the case of

1.
Captain
his date of rank and effective
placed, had he been selected by the  
Selection Board.

Capta

is requesting an adjustment to

date where he would have been

FY99 USMC Captain Promotion

2.

The following facts are germane:

a.

Captain Turner was eligible, as an in zone officer, and

FY99 USMC Captain Promotion Selection

failed of selection on the  
Board, which convened on 980303.

b.

Captai

as an above zone officer,
Selection Board, which convened on 990302.
captain on 990801.

as subsequently considered and selected,

on the FYOO USMC Captain Promotion

He was promoted to

C .

Captain

es not to provide any justification to

warrant consideration of his request.
evidence that the board acted contrary to law, the action of the
board involved material error of fact or material administrative
error, or the board did not have material information before it.

He fails to provide

d.

record in FY9-9
additional
FY%& board.

y%r of 

@

@

argument that he had the exact same

Captain
obse%ation  time as a first 1

is unfounded.

3.
Promotion Branch recommends
request for a back date of rank.
evidence to support his case.

disapprov
Captain
If granted

e of rank to

e

5

Subj:

BCNR APPLICATION IN THE CASE OF CAPTA

USMC

captain would be 980901.
had if the 

FY99 board had selected him.

This is the date of rank he would have

in this matter is Chief Warrant Officer

2

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV

Y

H EADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS
D

3280  RUSSELL ROA

QUANTICO, VIRGINIA 221

  34-51 0

3

IN REPLY REFER TO:

1600
MMOA-4
14 Aug 01

MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF

NAVAL RECORDS

Subj:

Ref:

CAPTAI
SMC

(a) MMER Re
Captai
USMC of 1 Aug 01

Recommend disapproval of

1.
of his failure of selection and

Capt

request for removal
s date of rank.

He failed  

Per the reference, w
2.
se1
petition.
Selection Board.
Captai
the FY-00 USMC Captain s
petition requests backdating his date of rank.

s subsequent

record and

on

3.
In our opinion, Captai
before the boards, was corn

record, as it appeared
rate, and provided a fair

of his performance.
On the FY-99 board, Captain
ecord only contained 5 months of observed time in a
acement squadron.

In the subsequent board, an

additional year of observed fitness report time was available
for review.
record, we recommend disapproval of Capta
removal of his failure of selection and backdating his date of
rank.

Because there were no  

materi

ions to the
s request for

4.

POC is

t 

(7

Major, U. S. Marine Corps
Head, Officer Counseling and
Evaluation Section
Officer Assignment Branch
Personnel Management Division



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07671-01

    Original file (07671-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Performance Evaluation Review uested an advisory opinion in the case of Capta Captain requesting a date of rank adjustment to 990101 and a special selection board. The following facts are germane to the case: a. Captain as selected for Captain by the FY99 USMC Captain Promotion Selection Board. )c+~ & d. Reference (a) states the SECNAV is authorized to convene a special selection board to consider cases of "officers who were in or above the promotion zone before a promotion selection...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06974-01

    Original file (06974-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    ’s ’s record and C. That any material directed to be removed from Petitioner ’s naval record be returned to the Board, together with a copy of this Report of Proceedings, for retention in a confidential file maintained for such purpose, with no cross reference being made a part of Petitioner ’s naval record. (l), PERB removed from Captain We defer to BCNR on the issue of Captai 2. the removal of his failure of selection to the grade of Major. The memorandum will contain appropriate...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 01228-03

    Original file (01228-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. If Capta his date of is the date of rank he would have received upon selection from the FY02 USMC Captain Selection Board. Captain Legge requests back-dating of his date of rank.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03776-01

    Original file (03776-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Lieutenant Colone as subsequently selected, as an above zone officer, by USMC Lieutenant Colonel Promotion Selection Board and promoted to his current rank on 010401 . date of rank would be 000701. oint of contact in this matter is Capta t Head, Promotion Branch S. Marine Corps DEPARTMENT OF...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00955-00

    Original file (00955-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board's opinion, 4. vote, is that Report A should remain a part of Captain official military record. Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB) for removal of the Directed by the Commandant of the Marine Corps fitness report of 980117 to 980904. failures of selection. Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB) for removal of the Captain record and SMC Major he successfully petitioned the Duty fitness report of 940201 to 940731. requests removal of his failures of selection.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03922-00

    Original file (03922-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the lineal position, date of rank, and effective date in the grade of captain he would have been assigned had he been selected for promotion to that grade by the Fiscal Year (FY) 2000 Captain Selection Board, vice the FY 2001 Captain Selection Board. d. In correspondence attached as...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06620-00

    Original file (06620-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing his failure of selection before the Fiscal Year (FY) 1999 Captain Selection Board; returning him to the Regular Marine Corps effective 1 November 1999; and changing the date of rank and effective date of his promotion to captain to reflect selection by the FY 1999 Captain Selection...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04119-00

    Original file (04119-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed an application at enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his naval record be corrected to show the date of rank and effective date in the grade of captain he would have been assigned had he been selected to that grade by the Fiscal Year (FY) 1997 Reserve Captain Selection Board, vice the FY 1998 Reserve Captain Selection Board. The date of rank on his commission is 9 July 1997, the date of rank he had as...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09834-02

    Original file (09834-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Messrs. Agresti, Mimer and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner ’s allegations’ of error and injustice on 18 December 2002, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. After Petitioner had failed of selection by the FY 2002 Captain Selection Board, the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board directed removal of a fitness report. Captai Captain bove-Zone...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04707-01

    Original file (04707-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    directed that your Naval record will be corrected by removing therefrom the following fitness report: Having reviewed all the facts of record, the Board has the Performance Evaluation Review Board Date of Report --- - 29 Apr 00 Reporting Senior Period of Report 990710 to 000501 (CD) There will be inserted in your Naval record a memorandum in 2. place of the removed report. The memorandum will contain appropriate identifying data concerning the report and state that it has been removed by...