DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370.510
0
MEH:ddj
Docket No: 5522-01
11 September 2001
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 11 September 2001. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable
to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by CMC memorandum 1760 MMSR-6J of 21 August 2001, a copy of which is
attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
In this regard, it is important
Consequently,
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
,
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV
Y
HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS
134-3
3280 RUSSELL ROA
22
QUANTICO, VIRGINIA
D
103
IN REPLY REFER TO:
1760
MMSR-6J
21 Aug 01
MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR,
NAVAL RECORDS
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF
Subj
:
BCNR APPLICATION IN THE CASE OF
Ref:
Encl:
(a) MMER Route Sheet of
lAugO1, Docket No. 5522-01
(1) Statement of Service dtd
(2) Copy of
DOD Financial Management Reg,
20AugOl
VolB, Chap 1
reference requests an advisory opinion on
petition to correct his records to show that he rates
al pay as an
O-3E, vice O-3.
Enclosure (1) shows that
2.
6 months and 26 days active service as an enlisted member. As
stated in Paragraph 010205A of enclosure
"had over 4 years of active service as an enlisted member" to be
entitled to the special rate of pay as an O-3E.
(2), a captain
has completed 1 year,
muc;t have
Unfortunately,
W
3.
as he requests.
his record is warranted.
is not eligible for O-3E status
e, advise that no correction of
Head, Separation and
qetirement Branch
By direction of the Commandant
of the Marine Corps
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03968-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your spouse and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. ’s naval record In addition, the Board considered the advisory After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. when applying for a correction of an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08329-00
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 MEH:ecb Docket No: 17 July 2001 8329-00 This is in reference to your application for correction of your deceased spouse’s naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your spouse’s naval record and applicable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03322-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. were not properly counseled with regard to SBP coverage prior to his nonelection. Lieutenant Colonel enrollme desire further states that he and Mrs. e SBP and he is aware that, if en- rolled, he will be charged SBP costs back to his date of retire- ment.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00118-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 MEH:ddj Docket No: 118-01 6 November 2001 This is in reference to your application for correction of your deceased spouse pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your spouse ’s naval record and applicable statutes,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07274-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 March 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. has contacted the Defense Finance and Ohio requesting enrollment in Cleveland, that to enroll at this time would require He was tc that he pay back...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08111-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 March 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your spouse’s naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. ’ record to , Upon reaching retirement eligibility Master Sergeant 2. was given the opportunity to elect RCSBP coverage in March of 1982.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05749-01
Your allegations of error and A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable Roartl. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of to the proceedings of this willt your application, together naval record and applicable the advisory opinion furnished by copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 08484-98
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. 7 record shows that he served on active duty from * * Reference (a) requests an advisory opinion on- & petition to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08031-01
’s naval record In addition, the Board considered the advisory After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. tired from the Marine Corps and never attained the Warrant Officer W-4.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00769-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 April 2003. 0769-03 The reference requests an advisory opinion on'- .l__y_ petition to correct her late former husband's records to show that he was enrolled in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) with former spouse coverage when he died on 12 May 2002. Because it was the intention of the civil court that Gunnery Sergeant Slaterl s SBP coverage continue on as a...