ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002081996C070215
He was considered and not selected for promotion to major by the 2001 Reserve Components Selection Board (RCSB), which convened on 26 February 2001. He was discharged from the Reserve effective 1 January 2003. The Command Chaplain recommended complete relief with a discharge date on or about 9 December 2001, with removal of any record of a two-time passover.15.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002081998C070215
The applicant requests, in effect, a correction to his lieutenant colonel (LTC) date of rank (DOR); an adjustment to his Pay Entry Basic Date (PEBD) to account for a break in service between 1 September 2001 and 20 July 2002; and service credit, retirement points, and back pay for this break in service period. Finally, the NGB opinion indicates that had the applicant been selected for promotion by the original 2000 PSB, he would not have had a break in service and he would not have missed...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002081999C070215
The applicant requests correction to his date of rank for major from 4 January 2000 to 5 May 1999. He was promoted to major with a date of rank and promotion effective date of 3 January 2000. The Chief, Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, Total Army Personnel Command, expressed the opinion that the applicant’s date of rank for captain was 20 May 1992 and by the 7 years time in grade requirement his promotion eligibility date (PED) was 19 May 1999.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082000C070215
APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, promotion to major. The Chief, Special Actions Branch, Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, Total Army Personnel Command, expressed the opinion that the applicant was considered for promotion by the 1976 and 1977 RCSB’s and not recommended because his records did not contain evidence that he had completed an advanced course. This regulation specifies that in order to be promoted to major an individual must have completed 7 years of time in grade as a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082001C070215
He was appointed a second lieutenant in the USAR on 28 August 1952, and continuously served in the USAR until being transferred to the Retired Reserve, in the rank of LTC, on 27 September 1980. Although DA insists that his records that went before the 1979 PSB were complete, he considers it an injustice that the promotion board members could not recognize the fact that he, an officer recognized by DA as qualified for promotion, would not be eligible to go before a later convened board and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082002C070215
The applicant requests, in effect, that his enlistment be voided and correction to his promotion effective date and date of rank for captain. Pertinent laws and regulations specify that promotion as a result of recommendation by an SSB, upon such promotion, shall have the same promotion effective date for pay and allowances of that grade had the officer been recommended by the mandatory selection board. BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082009C070215
However, there is no evidence in the applicant's service personnel records which shows the degree (marksman, sharpshooter or expert) in which the applicant qualified for these qualification badges. Based on the foregoing, the Board determined that it would be appropriate to show that the applicant qualified as "marksman" on both qualification badges. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the individual concerned was awarded the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082011C070215
The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected by showing the award of a second Purple Heart and by changing item 23a (Specialty Number and Title) to show he was awarded the MOS (Military Occupational Specialty) of a heavy equipment operator and mechanic. Even though the applicant’s DA Form 20 shows a duty MOS of 64B during the period of his service in Vietnam, there is no evidence that he was trained in or...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082012C070215
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: Correction to his date of rank for lieutenant colonel from 7 June to 28 February 2002. He was issued a promotion memorandum with a promotion effective date and date of rank for lieutenant colonel of 7 June 2002.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082015C070215
APPLICANT REQUESTS: Correction to his date of rank for major. An officer selected by a mandatory promotion board that has a MTIG date before the approval date of the board, will have a promotion date and effective date no earlier than the date of approval of the mandatory board by which recommended. This regulation further specifies that an officer will not be considered for a Reserve promotion unless in an active Reserve status not later than the date a respective RCSB convenes to be...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082022C070215
The applicant states, in effect, that he was not considered for promotion by the 2002 promotion board. Based upon review of the applicant’s records by the Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, Total Army Personnel Command, it was determined the applicant was erroneously not considered and is eligible for consideration for promotion to CW5 by a Standby Advisory Board (STAB) under 2002 criteria. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082027C070215
Records available to the Board indicate that the applicant entered active duty on 19 June 1969. There were no medical records available to the Board, or provided by the applicant. The Board does note, however, that the applicant completed a qualifying period of service for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal on 14 January 1972.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082034C070215
The applicant requests, in effect, that his discharge from the United States Army Reserve (USAR) be voided and that he be transferred to the USAR Retired Reserve. The applicant states, in effect, that he believes his discharge from the USAR was unjust for the following reasons: he responded to the option letter provided him prior to the effective date of his discharge; his intent to enter the Retired Reserve was clearly established in his response to this option letter; he was not given...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082035C070215
His DD Form 214 indicates his rank as a SP4, with a date of rank (DOR) of 10 February 1969. Therefore, it would be in the interest of justice to correct his records to reflect his rank as SGT at this time. Accordingly, he is entitled to be awarded those awards at this time.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082037C070215
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded: The Board notes the applicant’s contention that his discharge should be upgraded based on his overall record of honorable service, as evidenced by his receiving the ARCOM and the AGCM. Therefore, the Board concludes that his GD accurately reflects the overall quality of his service and that the requested...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082054C070215
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. On 15 July 1968 the Army Discharge Review Board denied the applicant request to upgrade his discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082060C070215
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant’s military records were not available to the Board for review. Although the standard evidentiary documentation required for awarding the PH is not present in this case, the Board does find that the information contained in the unit historical files of the applicant’s unit maintained at the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082064C070215
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. However, her records show that on 24 September 2001, she was discharged from the USAR, under honorable conditions, under the provisions of Army Regulation 135-178, paragraph 7-11.c.1, for misconduct – abuse of illegal drugs. Army Regulation 135-178 serves as the authority for the separation of enlisted personnel serving in the USAR and Army National Guard.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082096C070215
The applicant states that his discharge records do not reflect credit for participation in the Anzio and Ardennes-Alsace campaigns, nor for his participation in the amphibious assault landing in Southern France. The applicant’s records contain a letter dated 4 May 1945, in which the applicant’s commander requested award of Battle Participation Stars and Arrowhead for the applicant. Therefore the applicant is entitled to award of the Bronze Star Medal based on award of this Combat...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082101C070215
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded: By regulation, this mandated that he be assigned an RE-3 code upon his discharge from the Army.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082111C070215
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The applicant requests...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082132C070215
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant was adjudged guilty by court-martial and that the convening authority approved the sentence.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082134C070215
PROCEEDINGS BOARD DATE: 12 June 2003 DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002082134 The applicant requests, in effect, that his retirement orders, Special Orders Number 103, dated 24 May 1968, be corrected to show the entry, "(COL)" [colonel] instead of "(LTC)" [lieutenant colonel]. Evidence of record shows the applicant was selected for permanent promotion to colonel in the Regular Army effective 2 January 1968.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082138C070215
There is no evidence in the applicant's service personnel records which shows that he was taken prisoner or held captive during the Korean War. Once the Korean War Service Medal has been authorized by the Department of the Air Force, the applicant may apply to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records to add this foreign award to his DD Form 214. There is no evidence of record available to the Board, and the applicant has provided no evidence, which shows that he was taken prisoner...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082142C070215
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. On 14 January 1993, the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082145C070215
APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, correction of his military awards to show he was awarded or authorized the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB), the Air Medal with numeral 11, and the Korean Defense Service Medal (KDSM). APPLICANT STATES : In effect, that during his 1965 tour in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN), while serving as the interpreter for a Civil Affairs Team, he was involved in a fire fight at a Special Forces A Camp, which he believes entitles him to the CIB. The applicant is advised to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082157C070215
The applicant states that his foreign service and medals are not shown on his Army DD Form 214. The applicant's service personnel records contain three discharge documents. Once the Korean War Service Medal has been authorized by the Department of the Air Force, the applicant may apply to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records to add this foreign award to his DD Form 214.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082159C070215
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his transfer to the Retired Reserve be revoked and that he be reinstated in the US Army Reserve (USAR) Individual Ready Reserve (IRR) in order to serve until his Mandatory Removal Date (MRD) of 1 July 2004. On 26 November 2002, the applicant was released from his TPU and was transferred to the Retired Reserve, effective 1 December 2002,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082165C070215
On 30 January 2001, the Army Grade Determination Review Board (AGDRB) considered the applicant’s case and determined that the highest grade in which he satisfactorily served for the purpose of computation of retired pay was SFC/E-7, and that the date he became eligible for advancement on the Retired List would be determined by the Army Reserve Personnel Command (ARPERSCOM). By law, members retire in the active duty grade they hold on the date of their REFRAD for retirement. The law does...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082167C070215
EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded: The applicant has failed to show through the evidence submitted or the evidence of record that the separation code issued to him was in error or unjust.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082168C070215
In January 2000, he received orders from his unit discharging him from the USAR instead of transferring him to the Retired Reserve, which he was unaware of. The Board notes that had it not been for the applicant's situation pertaining to his ex-spouse that he would have requested transfer to the Retired Reserve in a timely matter. Inasmuch as the applicant meets eligibility requirements for assignment to the Retired Reserve, it would be equitable and just to correct his military records by...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082170C070215
The applicant states, in effect, that he enlisted for a period of 3 years; however, section 20a of his DD Form 4/3 incorrectly indicates he enlisted for a period of 4 years. Accordingly, the Board finds that it would be in the interest of justice to correct his records to reflect that he enlisted for a period of 3 years. RECOMMENDATION : That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing in item 20a of the DD Form 4/3 dated 28 June 2000, pertaining...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082171C070215
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. His OMPF contains a copy of a National Guard Bureau (NGB) order, dated 16 December 1980, and shows that the applicant was transferred from his ARNG unit to the ING effective 24 October 1980. The commander notes that the applicant has presented documents to show that his MRD is not correct and should be corrected.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082178C070215
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests reconsideration of her earlier application to correct her military records to show her current sex. She also requests that her military records be corrected to show her new name.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082187C070215
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. Also, the applicant’s hearing in his right ear is within normal limits but a profound hearing loss was present in the left ear. In the opinion of the Board, since the applicant was treated for his injury by military medical personnel, had there been sufficient medical evidence to support his receiving the PH, it would have been recommended at the time of his treatment.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082191C070215
EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: On 12 December 1972, the Army Discharge Review Board denied the applicant’s request for an upgrade of his discharge.Army Regulation 635-212, in effect at the time, set forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel and provided, in pertinent part, that members involved in a frequent incidents of a discreditable nature with civil or military authorities were subject to separation for unfitness. Carl W. S....
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082193C070215
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. His successful completion of training, promotion to pay grade E-4, on two separate occasions, and letters of commendation, clearly indicates that the applicant was capable of honorable service, in spite of being only 20 plus years old. The applicant’s discharge was accomplished in accordance with applicable laws and regulations, and at the request of the applicant.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082202C070215
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The governing regulation states that since item 3a on the DD Form 214 may be an officer's temporary (AUS) or permanent (Regular Army or Reserve) grade and does not show the date of appointment, additional entries will be made in item 32 (Remarks) to clarify the grade status. However, there is no evidence available to the Board, and the applicant has provided no evidence,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082203C070215
There is no evidence in the applicant's service personnel records that he was awarded the Purple Heart or was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. There is no evidence in the applicant's service personnel records which shows that he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. However, evidence of record shows the applicant participated in five campaigns during his assignment in Vietnam which are not correctly shown by award of one silver service star for...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082206C070215
The applicant requests correction of his military records to show award of the Purple Heart. The issue as to whether this change in policy would be implemented retroactively to prisoners of war from World War I, World War II, and the Korean War was considered several times. After his discharge from the Army, he became entitled to a second award of the Bronze Star Medal based on his award of the Combat Infantryman Badge during World War II.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082208C070215
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: The applicant then requested immediate discharge due to his perception that he would not be able to overcome the bar.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082211C070215
Evidence shows the applicant was awarded the Army Superior Unit Award for his service in Bosnia. Evidence shows the applicant was authorized wear of the Kosovo Campaign Medal. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing the applicant was awarded the U.S. Coast Guard Meritorious Unit Commendation, the Special Operations Service Ribbon, the Army Superior Unit Award, the Kosovo Campaign Medal, and the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082215C070215
However, there is no evidence of record that shows the applicant received a third wound that resulted from hostile action. The evidence of record shows that the applicant served in Vietnam during three campaigns entitling him to wear three bronze service stars with the Vietnam Service Medal. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by awarding the applicant the second award of the Purple Heart for wounds received on 14 March 1968 and the Good Conduct...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082221C070215
The Government of Vietnam awarded this medal to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam during the period 1 March 1961 through 28 March 1973. The Board finds that the applicant’s service in Thailand was in direct support of operations in Vietnam; therefore he is entitled to award of the Vietnam Service Medal with three bronze service stars, the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal, and the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082222C070215
There is no evidence in the available records which shows that the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart or was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the individual concerned was awarded the first award of the Good Conduct...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082224C070215
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: There is no indication in the available records to show that the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board’s 15-year statute of limitations.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082226C070215
The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show he was awarded a Good Conduct Medal for his first period of service. The applicant’s military records show that he enlisted in the Army Reserve (USAR) on 20 November 1986 and entered active duty on 18 February 1987. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected to show that the applicant was awarded the Good Conduct Medal for his service from 18 February 1987 through 14 February 1989 and the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082236C070215
The applicant requests that her attendance at BNCOC (Basic Noncommissioned Officer Course) be reinstated and that her promotion to pay grade E-6 be restored. She states, in effect, that she was released from BNCOC after failing the Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT). When the applicant submitted her application to the Board in November 2002 she indicated her pay grade as E-6.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082244C070215
There is no evidence in the available records that shows the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart or was wounded as a result of hostile action. Also, the Board notes that the applicant's WD AGO Form 53-55 shows one bronze service star as an authorized award. Medical evidence of record shows the applicant was diagnosed with trench foot on 22 October 1944.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082246C070215
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. On 6 April 1962, the applicant signed a statement in which he admitted to participating in homosexual acts on three occasions with another soldier, whom he named. A discharge under other than honorable conditions may be issued only if there is a finding that during the current term of service the soldier attempted, solicited or committed a homosexual act in a location...