| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Ms. Stephanie Thompkins | Analyst |
| Mr. Arthur A. Omartian | Chairperson | |
| Mr. John P. Infante | Member | |
| Ms. Yolanda Maldonado | Member |
2. The applicant requests, in effect, promotion consideration to chief warrant officer five (CW5) under 2002 criteria.
3. The applicant states, in effect, that he was not considered for promotion by the 2002 promotion board. He also states that he met the time in grade and education requirements.
4. Based upon review of the applicant’s records by the Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, Total Army Personnel Command, it was determined the applicant was erroneously not considered and is eligible for consideration for promotion to CW5 by a Standby Advisory Board (STAB) under 2002 criteria.
5. Reserve promotion policy specifies that promotion reconsideration by a STAB may only be based on erroneous non-consideration or material error that existed in the record of a commissioned warrant officer at the time of consideration. A STAB is required for reconsideration for 1 October 1996 and later. It further specifies that promotion reconsideration by a STAB may only be based upon ABCMR determination approved by the Secretary of the Army.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant’s records were erroneously not considered for promotion to CW5 by the 2002 RCSB and should now be submitted for appropriate STAB consideration for this purpose.
2. In view of the foregoing findings and conclusions, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant’s records as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by submitting the records of the individual concerned to a duly constituted STAB as deemed appropriate for promotion consideration for CW5 under 2002 criteria.
2. That if selected, his records be further corrected by showing he was promoted to the next higher grade on his date of eligibility therefore, as determined by appropriate Departmental officials using the criteria cited, provided he was otherwise qualified and met all other prerequisites for promotion.
3. That if not selected, the applicant be so notified.
BOARD VOTE:
_AAO____ _YM____ __JPI___ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
_ Arthur A. Omartian______
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2002082022 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20030724 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | GRANT |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 131.00 |
| 2. | 131.10 |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090218C070212
Based upon review of the applicant’s records by the Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, Total Army Personnel Command, it was determined that the applicant’s official military personnel file (OMPF) contained material error when he was considered and non-selected for promotion to CW3 by the 2002 RCSB. A STAB is required for reconsideration for 1 October 1996 and later. In view of the foregoing findings and conclusions, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant’s records as...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089098C070403
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant states that the last officer evaluation report seen by the promotion board was for an annual training he completed in 1999. Based upon review of the applicant’s records by the Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, Total Army Personnel Command, it was determined that the applicant’s official...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090217C070212
Based upon review of the applicant’s records by the Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, Total Army Personnel Command, it was determined that the applicant’s official military personnel file (OMPF) contained material error when she was considered and non-selected for promotion to CW4 by the 2002 RCSB. A STAB is required for reconsideration for 1 October 1996 and later. In view of the foregoing findings and conclusions, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant’s records as...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089113C070403
Based upon review of the applicant’s records by the Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, Total Army Personnel Command, it was determined that the applicant’s official military personnel file (OMPF) contained material error when he was considered and non-selected for promotion to CW4 by the 2002 RCSB. A STAB is required for reconsideration for 1 October 1996 and later. That if selected his records be further corrected by showing he was promoted to the next higher grade on his date of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090730C070212
Based upon review of the applicant’s records by the Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, Total Army Personnel Command, it was determined the applicant was erroneously not considered and is eligible for consideration for promotion to chief warrant officer four by a Standby Advisory Board (STAB) under 2001 criteria. It was also determined that the applicant’s official military personnel file (OMPF) contained material error when he was considered for promotion to chief warrant officer...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089439C070403
The applicant states that all of his officer evaluation reports were not present for consideration by the 2002 promotion board. Based upon review by the Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, Total Army Personnel Command, the applicant’s official military personnel file (OMPF) contained material error when he was considered and non-selected by the 2002 Reserve Components Selection Board (RCSB). The applicant’s records contained material error when reviewed for promotion to CW4 by the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089465C070403
The applicant states that his 1998 officer evaluation report was never forwarded for profiling and was not seen by the 2002 promotion board. Based upon review by the Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, Total Army Personnel Command, the applicant’s official military personnel file (OMPF) contained material error when he was considered and non-selected by the 2002 Reserve Components Selection Board (RCSB). The applicant’s records contained material error when reviewed for promotion to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002070984C070402
The applicant states that his records were not submitted for consideration for promotion to CW3 during the 2001 promotion board. He also states that his records were up to date and he is eligible and qualified for promotion. Based upon review of the applicant’s records by the Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, Total Army Personnel Command, it was determined the applicant was erroneously not considered and is eligible for consideration for promotion to CW3 by a Standby Advisory Board...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002070986C070402
The applicant states that the 2001 promotion board did not consider him. Based upon review of the applicant’s records by the Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, Total Army Personnel Command, it was determined the applicant was erroneously not considered and is eligible for consideration for promotion to CW3 by a Standby Advisory Board (STAB) under 2001 criteria. He was erroneously not considered for promotion to CW3 by the 2001 Reserve Components Selection Board.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089108C070403
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Based upon review of the applicant’s records by the Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, Total Army Personnel Command, it was determined that the applicant’s official military personnel file (OMPF) contained material error when he was considered and non-selected for promotion to CW4 by the 2001 RCSB. A...