Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082015C070215
Original file (2002082015C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 12 June 2003
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002082015

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Ms. Stephanie Thoimpkins Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Raymond V. O'Connor, Jr. Chairperson
Mr. John P. Infante Member
Ms. Eloise C. Prendergast Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: Correction to his date of rank for major.

APPLICANT STATES: That in accordance with the Reserve Officer Personnel Management Act (ROPMA), his date of rank should be 7 years from his date of rank for captain. In support of his request he submits copies of his promotion memorandums for captain and major, his officer record brief and his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty).

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

He was appointed in the Reserve as a second lieutenant effective 27 August 1987.

He was promoted to first lieutenant effective 26 May 1990 and entered on active duty effective 13 July 1990.

He was promoted to captain effective 1 November 1992. Based on the required 7 years time in grade, his maximum time in grade (MTIG) date for major was 31 October 1999.

He was separated from active duty effective 30 January 2000 and transferred to a Reserve troop program unit and placed on the Reserve Active Status List (RASL).

The Officer Personnel Management Division, Army Reserve Personnel Command verified that he was assigned to the Active Guard/Reserve (AGR) program and assigned to a major position effective 30 January 2000.

He was considered and selected for promotion to major by the 2000 RCSB. This was the first RASL promotion board he was eligible for past his MTIG date. It convened from 7 March to 6 April 2000. The President approved the results of the board on 19 July 2000. He was not eligible for consideration by an earlier promotion board since he was on active duty until 30 January 2000. The 1999 RCSB convened from 2 March to 2 April 1999. He was previously not selected for promotion to major while on active duty in 1998 and 1999.

The Chief, Promotion and Notifications Branch, Office of Reserve Promotions, Total Army Personnel Command (PERSCOM), expressed the opinion that the applicant was promoted to captain on 1 November 1992. Promotion to major requires 7 years time in grade; therefore, his promotion eligibility date to major was 31 October 1999. He was considered and selected for promotion to major by the 2000 RCSB and recommended for promotion. Under ROPMA, an officer cannot be promoted until the President has approved the board. The President


approved the board on 19 July 2000 and the results were released on 10 August 2000. He was issued a promotion memorandum on 10 August 2000, with a date of rank 19 July 2000, since this was the day the President approved the board. Based on this information, it was recommended that the applicant's request be denied.

The opinion was forwarded to the applicant for his acknowledgment/rebuttal on 19 February 2003. He did not respond.

Army Regulation 135-155 prescribes the policies and procedures for promotion of Reserve officers on the RASL. This regulation specifies that an officer is promoted after selection, if all qualifications are met. An officer selected by a mandatory promotion board that has a MTIG date before the approval date of the board, will have a promotion date and effective date no earlier than the date of approval of the mandatory board by which recommended. In no case, will the date of rank or effective date of promotion be earlier than the date the board is approved.

This regulation further specifies that an officer will not be considered for a Reserve promotion unless in an active Reserve status not later than the date a respective RCSB convenes to be considered by that RCSB for a Reserve promotion.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, and advisory opinion(s), it is concluded:

1. The applicant is not entitled to adjustment of his date of rank for major to 31 October 1999, his MTIG date. He has not shown error or injustice for the relief he is requesting.

2. The Board notes his contention that he should have a date of rank of 31 October 1999 based on completion of 7 years in the grade of captain. The Board concludes however, that the applicant was properly considered when he was not selected for promotion to major in 1998 and 1999 while on the ADL.

3. Subsequent to the applicant’s non-selections for promotion to major while on active duty, and his separation from active duty on 30 January 2000, he was properly considered for Reserve promotion by the 2000 RCSB, the first board held after his separation and transfer to the RASL. This board convened from 7 March to 6 April 2000, and was approved by the President on 19 July 2000. He was promoted immediately, on 19 July 2000, with a date of rank of 19 July 2000. His date of rank and promotion effective date are proper and he has not shown otherwise.

4. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

_ELP____ _JPI____ _RVO___ DENY APPLICATION




                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2002082015
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20030612
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 131.00
2. 131.05
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063121C070421

    Original file (2001063121C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Paragraph 4-21 specifies that unit officers selected by a mandatory board will have a promotion date and effective date no earlier than the date the board is approved by the President, provided they are assigned to a position in the higher grade. Promotion to major requires 7 years time in grade; therefore, his promotion eligibility date to major was 1 October 1999. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001061067C070421

    Original file (2001061067C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that the Reserve Officer Personnel Management Act (ROPMA), Title 10, U. S. Code (USC), section 14304, requires that an officer recommended for promotion by a selection board the first time the officer is considered, while in or above the promotion zone, and who is placed on an approved promotion list, be promoted not later than their maximum time-in-grade (MTIG) for their present grade. The Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, U. S. Total Army Personnel...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001066258C070421

    Original file (2001066258C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The opinion also stated that since the applicant met the time in grade (TIG) requirement on 25 June 1999, it is recommended that he be issued a corrected promotion order with a DOR of 25 June 1999, and an effective date of 3 January 2000. Chapter 1405 (Promotions), section 14304 of the ROPMA law, states that officers who are on the Reserve Active Status List (RASL) shall be considered for promotion to the next higher grade by a promotion board convened under section 14101(a), a Reserve...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002081328C070215

    Original file (2002081328C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: Correction to his date of rank for major from 19 June 2002 to 17 June 2001, the date his was assigned to a major’s position. This regulation also specifies that for an officer selected by a mandatory promotion board that has a MTIG date before the approval date of the board, the promotion date and effective date will be no earlier than the date of approval of the mandatory board by which recommended. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067195C070402

    Original file (2002067195C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his date of rank (DOR) for promotion to major (MAJ) under the Reserve Officer Personnel Management Act (ROPMA) be corrected from 19 July 2000 to 28 June 2000. Chapter 1405 (Promotions), section 14304 of the ROPMA law, states that officers who are on the Reserve Active Status List (RASL) shall be considered for promotion to the next higher grade by a promotion board convened under section 14101(a), a Reserve Component Selection Board (RCSB) far enough...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002070673C070402

    Original file (2002070673C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was promoted to major with a promotion effective date and date of rank of 19 July 2000. An officer selected by a mandatory promotion board that has a MTIG date before the approval date of the board, the officer’s promotion date and effective date will be no earlier than the date of approval of the mandatory board by which recommended. The Chief, Promotion and Notifications Branch, Office of Promotions, PERSCOM, expressed the opinion that the applicant was selected for promotion to major...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002069397C070402

    Original file (2002069397C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was promoted to major with a date of rank and promotion effective date of 19 July 2000. An officer selected by a mandatory promotion board that has a MTIG date before the approval date of the board, the officer’s promotion date and effective date will be no earlier than the date of approval of the mandatory board by which recommended.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087575C070212

    Original file (2003087575C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Upon leaving active duty for the Active/Guard Reserve (AGR) program his records should have been considered for the 1999 promotion board and not the 2000 promotion board. He was promoted to major effective 19 July 2000. It was recommended that the earliest date the applicant could receive was 1 August 1999, the date he went into the higher graded position as his date of rank and an effective date of 19 July 2000.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002079684C070215

    Original file (2002079684C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction to his date of rank for major from 3 January 2000 to 19 May 1999. He was promoted to major with a date of rank and promotion effective date of 3 January 2000. Since he was in an AGR position authorized the higher grade as of 19 April 1999, it was recommended that his promotion order be corrected to reflect a date of rank of 19 May 1999 and an effective date of 3 January 2000.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004101062C070208

    Original file (2004101062C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was promoted to major with a date of rank and a promotion effective date of 19 July 2000. In an application to this Board dated 15 January 2002, the applicant requested that his records be corrected to show his effective date of rank to major as 1 July 1999. An officer selected by a mandatory promotion board that has a MTIG date before the approval date of the board, the officer’s promotion date and effective date will be no earlier than the date of approval of the mandatory...