Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082203C070215
Original file (2002082203C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
PROCEEDINGS


         IN THE CASE OF:
        

         BOARD DATE: 6 May 2003
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002082203


         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Ms. Wanda L. Waller Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Fred N. Eichorn Chairperson
Ms. Lana E. McGlynn Member
Mr. Larry C. Bergquist Member

         The applicant and counsel if any, did not appear before the Board.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)

FINDINGS :

1. The applicant has exhausted or the Board has waived the requirement for exhaustion of all administrative remedies afforded by existing law or regulations.


2. The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart.

3. The applicant states that in the summer of 1968, during a mortar and rocket attack, the supply sergeant trampled his left foot while evacuating the tent. He contends that his little toe was broken, that he received medical treatment (taped toe) and that the medic told him that he would post this entry to his medical records. He states that he recently found out that this incident was never entered into his medical records when the Veterans Affairs denied his claim for a foot problem because there is no evidence to show that it was service related. He states that this entry should have been made in his medical records and that he should have received a Purple Heart for being injured as a direct result of an enemy attack. In support of his application, he submits a letter of explanation, dated 25 October 2002.

4. The applicant’s military records show that he served in the U.S. Navy from
8 July 1955 through 12 June 1959 and served in the U.S. Naval Reserve from
13 June 1959 through 20 September 1960. He enlisted in the Regular Army on 21 September 1960 and remained on active duty through continuous reenlistments until he retired on 30 September 1983 in the rank of master sergeant.

5. The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he served in Vietnam from 14 January 1968 through 10 January 1969.

6. The applicant's DD Forms 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) covering the periods 1 November 1962 through 31 October 1968 and 1 November 1968 through 18 September 1972, which were authenticated in his own hand, do not show the Purple Heart as an authorized award.

7. There is no evidence in the applicant's service personnel records that he was awarded the Purple Heart or was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam.

8. The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not reflect entitlement to the Purple Heart and item 40 (Wounds) on his DA Form 20 is blank.

9. The applicant's name does not appear on the Vietnam Casualty Roster.

10. The applicant's DD Form 214 with an effective date of 31 October 1968 shows the Vietnam Service Medal as an authorized award. His records show that he participated in five campaigns during his assignment in Vietnam.

11. Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) shows the applicant is entitled to award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation based on Department of the Army General Orders Number 8, dated 1974. This award is not shown on his DD Forms 214 with effective dates of 31 October 1968 or
18 September 1972.

12. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.

13. Army Regulation 600-8-22, in pertinent part, authorizes award of a bronze service star, based on qualifying service, for each campaign listed in Appendix B of this regulation and states that authorized bronze service stars will be worn on the appropriate service medal. Regulation states, in pertinent part, that a silver service star is authorized in lieu of five bronze service stars.

CONCLUSIONS:

1. The Board considered the applicant's contention that he should have received a Purple Heart for being injured as a direct result of an enemy attack. However, the applicant has provided no evidence to support this contention.

2. There is no evidence in the applicant's service personnel records which shows that he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action in Vietnam.

3. Based on the foregoing, the Board determined that there is insufficient evidence on which to base award of the Purple Heart in this case.

4. The applicant’s DD Form 214 with an effective date of 31 October 1968 shows the Vietnam Service Medal as an authorized award. However, evidence of record shows the applicant participated in five campaigns during his assignment in Vietnam which are not correctly shown by award of one silver service star for wear on his Vietnam Service Medal. Therefore, in accordance with the governing regulation, the applicant is entitled to the Vietnam Service Medal with one silver bronze service stars and correction of his military records to show these awards.

5. The applicant's unit received the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation while he was assigned to it. Therefore, the applicant is entitled to correction of his military records to show this unit citation.

6. In view of the foregoing findings and conclusions, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant’s records, but only as recommended below.


RECOMMENDATION:

1. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the individual concerned was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal with one silver service star and the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation.

2. That so much of the application as pertains to award of the Purple Heart be denied.

BOARD VOTE:

FNE___ LEM____ LCB_____ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION




                  _Fred N. Eichorn_______
                  CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID AR2002082203
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20030506
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION GRANT
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 107.0015
2. 107.0000
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002078739C070215

    Original file (2002078739C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no evidence in the applicant's service personnel records that he was awarded the Purple Heart or was wounded as a result of hostile action. There is no evidence in the applicant's service personnel records which shows that he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. However, evidence of record shows the applicant participated in three campaigns during his assignment in Vietnam which are not correctly shown by award of three bronze service stars for wear on...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070006767

    Original file (20070006767.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the Purple Heart. In the absence of evidence that the applicant was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action and treated for those wounds by military medical personnel, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award of the Purple Heart in this case. Record shows the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070011543

    Original file (20070011543.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the applicant's DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge), dated 19 January 1969, shows he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal, and the Vietnam Campaign Medal. Evidence of record shows that the applicant was assigned to the 86th Engineer Battalion during the period this unit was awarded the Meritorious Unit...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090019140

    Original file (20090019140.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's service medical records are not available. A review of the Awards and Decorations Computer Assisted Retrieval System (ADCARS) maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the United States Army Human Resources Command (HRC), which is an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 failed to reveal any award of the Army Commendation Medal with "V' Device, Purple Heart, or Combat Infantryman Badge orders on file for the applicant. During his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005110

    Original file (20120005110.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show: * three awards of the Purple Heart * Bronze Star Medal with "V" Device * Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Silver Star 2. Notwithstanding the applicant's sincerity, in the absence of orders or other documentation that conclusively shows he was ever wounded or injured as a result of enemy action and received medical treatment for such wounds or injuries,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082863C070215

    Original file (2002082863C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    16 October 1969 in Vietnam. However, evidence of record shows the applicant participated in six campaigns during his assignments in Vietnam which are not correctly shown by award of one silver service star and one bronze service star for wear on his Vietnam Service Medal. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the individual concerned was awarded the Bronze Star Medal with Second Oak Leaf Cluster with "V" Device, the Air Medal, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016215

    Original file (20100016215.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). c. A statement, dated 22 January 2010, from a retired SFC and comrade who served with the applicant in Vietnam and has known him over the years. In view of the foregoing, there is insufficient evidence to support award of the Purple Heart in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060004248C070205

    Original file (20060004248C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Headquarters, 1st Cavalry Division (Airmobile) General Orders Number 13918, dated 12 November 1968, show the applicant received the Army Commendation Medal for meritorious service during the period October 1967 to October 1968. Therefore, the service medical records and the entry on the Vietnam Casualty Roster which show the applicant was wounded on 14 May 1970 as a result of hostile action are accepted as sufficient evidence on which to base award of the Purple Heart and correction of his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002069333C070402

    Original file (2002069333C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his military records to show that he was awarded the Purple Heart and that he served in Vietnam for more than one year. There are no orders in the applicant’s service personnel records, which show that he was awarded the Purple Heart. While the Board has no reason to doubt the applicant’s statement that he was in fact wounded and awarded the Purple Heart, documentary evidence is required to correct a military record.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075363C070403

    Original file (2002075363C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Purple Heart and the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar. There are no orders in the applicant’s service personnel records which show that he was awarded the Purple Heart. However, there is no evidence of record, and the applicant has provided no medical evidence which shows he was wounded or treated for wounds as a result of...