Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082178C070215
Original file (2002082178C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
PROCEEDINGS


         IN THE CASE OF:
        

         BOARD DATE: 13 November 2003
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002082178


         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mrs. Nancy L. Amos Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Arthur A. Omartian Chairperson
Ms. Eloise C. Prendergast Member
Mr. Ronald E. Blakely Member

         The applicant and counsel if any, did not appear before the Board.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)

FINDINGS :

1. The applicant has exhausted or the Board has waived the requirement for exhaustion of all administrative remedies afforded by existing law or regulations.


2. The applicant requests reconsideration of her earlier application to correct her military records to show her current sex. She also requests that her military records be corrected to show her new name.

3. The applicant states that she has already changed her sex to female and so is not requesting the correction to obtain intersex surgery. She understands that her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) is not in error. She appreciates the previous Board's graciousness in filing her request in her Official Military Personnel File, thereby having her gender change noted in her records. However, that proved to be insufficient for her needs. She needs her records, particularly her Defense Eligibility Enrollment Reporting System (DEERS) records, corrected so she may obtain those medical services unique to her new sex.

4. Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in a memorandum prepared to reflect the Board's original consideration of her case on 12 September 2002 (AR2002069185).

5. On 4 September 2001, the Circuit Court of the City of Colonial Heights, VA ordered the State Registrar to amend the applicant's certificate of birth to show the change of her sex (to female). Upon the submission of a certified court order showing her name change, her certificate of birth would be corrected to show her new name (of DaleLynn L___ S___). A copy of the court order changing the applicant's name is not available; however, the amended birth certificate she provided is under her new name.

6. In a 15 November 2002 response to the applicant, the U. S. Total Army Personnel Command, Army DEERS/RAPIDS Program Manager, Chief, ID Policy Section, informed the applicant that, in the Office of The Judge Advocate General's view, changing her gender designation on military records that are used to determine both the applicant's and her spouse's eligibility for medical benefits was not a mere clerical matter. Rather, it required a discretionary determination of error and injustice that clearly falls under the purview of the Secretary of the Army.

7. Army Regulation 635-5 prescribes the separation documents prepared for soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army. It establishes standardized policy for the preparation of the DD Form 214. In pertinent part it states that the DD Form 214 is a synopsis of the soldier’s most recent period of continuous active duty. It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement or discharge.

8. Title 10, U. S. Code, section 1552 authorizes the Secretary of a military department to correct any military record of the Secretary's department when the Secretary considers it necessary to correct an error or remove an injustice.

CONCLUSIONS:

1. For historical purposes, the Army has an interest in maintaining the accuracy of its records. The data and information contained in those records should actually reflect the conditions and circumstances that existed at the time the records were created. In the absence of a showing of material error or injustice, this Board is reluctant to recommend that those records be changed.

2. The applicant appropriately served on active duty and was discharged under the name and sex she provided upon her entry. She changed her name and underwent sex reassignment surgery (from male to female) after her discharge. Therefore, as the applicant recognizes, her current discharge documents are correct as currently constituted and, as a result, there is no basis for changing them.

3. However, the applicant served in the Army for over 20 years and earned not just a retirement check but also all other benefits afforded retirees. Changing her gender and name in DEERS (a compilation of data collected at the individual Service level for the purpose of administering programs common to all) will allow her to obtain an identification card that accurately presents her likeness and name and ease her ability to access medical care and other retiree benefits.

4. While the correction may provide the applicant with certain medical services she would not have normally obtained prior to intersex surgery (such as mammograms), it denies her certain medical services she would have otherwise obtained (such as testing for prostate cancer). No net advantage will be given to the applicant.

5. The applicant must understand that eligibility for medical treatment under TRICARE is still governed by the Department of Defense. TRICARE may or may not rely upon the requested correction in determining her eligibility for certain medical benefits. Her spouse may or may not have her eligibility for medical benefits disrupted as a result of this correction.

6. Although the court documents legally changing the applicant's name are not available, the Board presumes that they were properly submitted in accordance with the Circuit Court of the City of Colonial Heights, VA order changing her sex. Otherwise, the applicant's certificate of birth would not have been amended to show her new name.

7. The Board has determined that as a matter of justice that the applicant should be issued a DA Form 1569 (Transcript of Military Record) showing her current sex (female) and in her current female name and that DEERS should be corrected to reflect this new information.

8. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected but only as recommended below.

RECOMMENDATION:

1. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by issuing to the applicant a DA Form 1569, in the name of DaleLynn L___ S___ and showing her current sex to be female.

2. That DEERS records be corrected to reflect the applicant's current name and sex.

BOARD VOTE:

__aao___ __ecp___ __reb___ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION




                  _Arthur A. Omartian
                  CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID AR2002082178
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20031113
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION GRANT
REVIEW AUTHORITY Mr. Schneider
ISSUES 1. 100.11
2. 100.01
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010594

    Original file (20080010594.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    They have advised him that he needs to have his military records completely changed to show his gender as male for them to correct their records. The applicant did not undergo the sex reassignment surgery (from female to male) or change of name until more than 16 years after discharge. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. including in the applicant's official records the fact that as of the 31 January...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002069185C070402

    Original file (2002069185C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: The military records and separation document confirm that the applicant’s active duty service was performed as a male.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060005325C070205

    Original file (20060005325C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement or discharge. Although the applicant’s last name was changed due to marriage, evidence of record shows the same first and middle names and gender were used at the time of the applicant's enlistment in 1989 and his release from active duty in 1990. As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to changing the applicant's gender on his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015885

    Original file (20140015885.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that her military records be corrected by: a. issuing a corrected DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) with her current name, Matxxxx Jxxx Dxxxx, and Social Security Number (SSN), XXX-XX-XX18; or b. reissuing of a new complete DA Form 1569-E (Transcript of Military Record) incorporating all previous corrections; and c. providing her information under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). The applicant provides – * two DD...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080005444

    Original file (20080005444.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, correction of her military records to show her current name and sex. ___________x____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011781

    Original file (20130011781.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The enlistment documents on file confirm the applicant's first name was P--- and the gender was male at the time. The fact that subsequent to service the applicant changed her first name and gender does not provide a sufficiently mitigating basis for changing the information recorded in the military records, which was correct at the time the applicant performed military service. However, it is concluded that it would be appropriate to issue a Transcript of Military Record (DA Form 1569) in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040006388C070208

    Original file (20040006388C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 29 September 2005 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20040006388 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests, in effect, that her records be corrected to reflect her gender reassignment (sex change) and name change. He was separated from active duty and discharged from the USAR under that name and gender.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-00989

    Original file (BC-2002-00989.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00989 INDEX CODE 100.01 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The DD Form 214 issued upon retirement be changed to reflect the current legal name of “------.” rather than “-----.” _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: On 12 February 2002, she...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050000123C070206

    Original file (20050000123C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant is not interested in changing the name and gender throughout the military record, only on the subject DD Form 214. Therefore, as a matter of compassion, it would be appropriate to issue a Transcript of Military Record (DA Form 1569), under the applicant's current legal female name, showing the applicant's honorable active duty service from 29 April 1965 through 18 January 1968 and from 19 January 1968 through 13 May 1970. As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013293

    Original file (20140013293.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    She provides: * statement from counsel * court order changing her name * New Jersey Auto Driver License * social security card * United States Uniformed Services Identification Card * DD Form 214 for the period ending 20 September 2011 * DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214) * Record of Proceedings for Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records (AFBCMR) Docket Number BC-2003-04051 * orders promoting her to sergeant major/E-9 COUNSEL'S REQUEST, STATEMENT AND EVIDENCE: 1. In cases...