AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00181
His DD Form 214 and his Air Force Form 7, Airman Military Record, does not reflect any foreign service. The complete DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 11 June 2010 for review and response within 30 days (Exhibit D). We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however,...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00183
His records be corrected to reflect he was awarded the Presidential Unit Citation (PUC). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial with respect to the applicants request for the PUC, indicating they were unable to verify the applicants...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00189
The DPSIAR complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 9 Apr 10 for review and comment within 30 days. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00191
He be awarded the Air Force Combat Action Medal (AFCAM). After a thorough review of the available evidence and the applicant's complete submission, we find no evidence that his records should be corrected to show he was awarded the AFCAM. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2010-00191 in Executive Session on 20 Jul 10, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Panel Chair Member Member The...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00192
She believes had she been approved for retraining in the May/June/July 2008 timeframe, she would have extended to meet the retraining retainability requirements, went to technical school, and then reenlisted in the SRB career field. In fact, even if the applicants Mar 08 retraining could have been approved, she would not have been able to extend her enlistment, but would have to reenlist in order to obtain the required retainability. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00200
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00200 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. In response to our request, applicant provided post- service information, which is attached at Exhibit D. On 6 Apr 10, the applicant requested to...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00202
The member inputs the date he or she desires to retire and the application is routed through his/her commanders to the Air Reserve Personnel Center (ARPC) for approval and processing. He completed a retirement application online through the vPC-GR, on 6 December 2008, requesting a retirement effective date of 6 June 2009. Both commanders recommended approval of the retirement, as well as the 6 June 2009 effective date.
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00205
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: DPSIAR recommends denial. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and the recommendation of the Air Force office of...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00206
Applicant's complete submission is at Exhibit A. The complete ARPC/DPP evaluation is at Exhibit B. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 16 Jul 10.
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00208
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00208 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His honorable discharge be changed to reflect a disability discharge or a medical retirement with retroactive pay. On 14 May 92, his commander notified him that he was recommending his discharge from the Air Force for conditions that interfere with...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00209
He lied when asked about the drugs he had used and his length of time spent in the drug rehab. His medical records; however, still contain false “OPIOID DEPENDENCY” statements which he would like removed. The recommendation provided by the Air Force office of primary responsibility is duly noted; however, we find the applicant has not exhausted all of his administrative remedies.
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00210
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00210 INDEX CODE: 137.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His record be changed to show he elected spouse coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). We took notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00211
For that reason, DPAPP sent the applicant a letter on 10 May 10 requesting documents such as travel vouchers, evaluation reports, or other official military documents that reflect his travel to Vietnam was completed along withthe inclusive dates of the travel; however, he did not respond.Therefore, DPAPP cannot support the applicants request.- The DPSOEcomplete evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation wasforwarded to the...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00219
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00219 INDEX CODE: 110.00; 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The narrative reason for separation - “Unsuitable Apathy Defective Attitude” and the separation code of SPD-JMJ be removed from his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty. The applicant was...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00220
We took notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2010-00220 in Executive Session on 30 November...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00221
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00221 INDEX CODE: 137.04 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His record be corrected to show that he was not married at the time he retired from the Air Force; and, to allow him to elect spouse coverage for his current wife under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). In...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00226
The specific reason is that on 24 January 1994, the applicant was diagnosed with adjustment and personality disorders which were not compatible with her military duties. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that she was discharged on 14 February 1994 with a narrative reason for separation of "Adjustment Disorder" rather than...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00232
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00232 INDEX CODE: 110.02 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Under Other Than Honorable Conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded. On 21 July 2010, the applicant was given an opportunity to submit comments about his post service activities (Exhibit C). However, we...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00234
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00234 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His record be corrected to show that he was awarded the Air Force Commendation Medal, Second Oak Leaf Cluster (AFMC, w/2nd OLC) and his Home of Record (HOR) be changed to Memphis TN (Administratively Corrected). ...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00235
However, the applicant has provided no documentation showing a pending larceny charge. The JAJM complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 21 May 2010, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). We took notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00237
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He received an unfair and unjust rating without any documentation and there was no feedback during or before 4 Feb 07 through 3 Feb 08. The Evaluations Reports Appeals Board (ERAB) denied his appeal of the contested report. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00245
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00245 INDEX CODE: 107.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he was awarded the Air Force Achievement Medal (AFAM) on 5 Apr 07 for outstanding achievement on 7 Aug 02. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00248
The complete DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 2 April 2010, for review and comment within 30 days. We took notice of the complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00249
However, we disagree with his view of the opinions and note that the issue before us is whether the applicant should be restored to the grade of airman first class with 19 months time in grade from airman basic. Exhibit C. Letter, AFLOA/JAJM, dated 4 Mar 10. Exhibit D. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPSOE, dated 18 Mar 10.
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00257
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00257 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect award of the Air Force Expeditionary Service Ribbon (AFESR), the Air Force Expeditionary Service Ribbon with Gold Border (AFESR w/GB),...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00263
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00263 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The narrative reason for separation on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty be changed to allow his entry into the Army. Furthermore, the applicant did not submit any evidence or identify any errors...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00264
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: At the time of discharge, he was offered an expedited general discharge. On 20 December 1985, the discharge authority determined that a general discharge was appropriate in light of the applicants overall military record. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00270 ADDENDUM
For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicants request, and the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings at Exhibit G. By way of undated letter, the applicant requests reconsideration and submits additional supporting documentation for reconsideration. First he was not provided a Medical Evaluation Board assessment while on active duty. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00273
The erroneous DD Form 214, documenting a released from active duty date of 30 Sep 07, credits the applicant with more than the requisite 18 years of total active service and would provide a basis for his claims. ARPC records support the conclusion the DD Form 214 was in error and the re-issued form reflects the applicants accrued time as 16 years, 4 months, and 6 days of active service. The applicant contends he had attained more than 18 years of total active service, thus qualifying him...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00275
___________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant enlisted into the Air Force Reserve on 17 Aug 04 in the grade of airman basic (E-1). On 23 Feb 10, AFPC/DPSOA requested the applicant provide a copy of her transcript so they could determine if she had accumulated the necessary credits to receive an advance grade upon her initial enlistment; however, as of this date DPSOA has received no response. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00276
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00276 INDEX NUMBER: 145.00 COUNSEL: XXX HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: It appears the applicant is requesting his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect that he was medically discharged; however the applicants request is unclear. The complete SGP...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00289
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00289 INDEX CODE: 107.00 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) and Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVCM). DPSIDR states that after a thorough review of the applicants military record, they found no evidence to support any...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00290
He believes all Air Force members should receive college credit for courses completed no matter when they were completed. He is being unjustly punished for serving his country by not being awarded college credit for courses he completed while in the Air Force. We took notice of the applicant's request to be given college credit for Air Force courses he completed; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00291
The service member and the applicant divorced on 24 February 1999. AFPC/DPSIAR has provided an evaluation which states the decedent and the applicant were married and he elected spouse only SBP coverage. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2010-00291 in Executive Session on 10 August 2010, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Panel Chair Member Member The following documentary evidence...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00304
INDEX CODE: 100.00 AFBCMR BC-2010-00304 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: XXXXXXX Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00305
The DPSIDR complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He was stationed at Hahn Air Base (AB), Germany, from Jan 87 thru Jan 91. We took notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, after a thorough review of the applicants submission and his military records, we found that there was no evidence provided that supported his contention that he...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00308
Although the SBP RIP was dated after the election was made, there is no evidence the applicant was not counseled on the SBP at the time he completed the form. Furthermore, the applicant could have made changes to his SBP election any time prior to his retirement date. We took notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00313
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00313 INDEX CODE: A94.39/40 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge be upgraded to Honorable. Based on the available evidence of record, it appears the applicants General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge was consistent with the...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00332
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit B. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of a material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00333
Later, he received a shot of cortisone to help manage the pain and was told that he may need surgery to correct his problem; the surgery was not one that could be performed in theater. Therefore, we recommend that the records be corrected as indicated below. Exhibit D. Letter, Applicant, dated 23 Mar 10.
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00337
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00337 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His AF Form 356, Findings and Recommended Disposition of United States Air Force (USAF) Physical Evaluation Board, dated 31 Jan 06, be changed to reflect his injuries were a direct result of enemy action , and that he be awarded benefits...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00338
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00338 INDEX CODE: 107.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross (DFC) for extraordinary achievement on 24 Mar 45 during World War II (WWII). Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIDR, dated 22 Mar 10. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 9 Apr 10.
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00339
JAJM states the applicant was not serving on a suspended punishment to the Article 15 on his date of separation of 21 January 2006. The complete JAJM evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSOA states the applicants RE code will be administratively changed to 3K. This RE code is the most appropriate code at this time; however, he will still require a waiver to reenter the military. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00343
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00343 INDEX CODE: 111.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Officer Performance Report (OPR) rendered for the period 25 June 2006 through 24 June 2007 be corrected to reflect the rank of major rather than lieutenant colonel. We took notice of the applicants complete submission in...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00353
___________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOS does not provide a recommendation. The Medical Consultant states that according to the clinical notes in the applicants records, on 10 Nov 08, the applicant indicated that she had knee problems prior to enlistment but had not sought medical care and failed to report this information to MEPS prior to her enlistment. It must be noted the Air Force disability boards must rate disabilities...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00361
He was issued a ticket by security forces, on 31 Jan 67, for parking illegally within a designated fire lane. The applicant provided a personal statement and letters of character reference in support of his appeal to have his discharge upgraded based on clemency; however, considering his overall record of service, the numerous offenses which led to his administrative separation, and the FBI Report of Investigation, we are not persuaded that an upgrade of the characterization of...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00362
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 24 March 2010 for review and response within 30 days (Exhibit C). We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00365
INDEX CODE: 100.00 AFBCMR BC-2010-00365 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: XXXXX Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00366
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00366 COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. DPSOS states the applicant did not submit any evidence or identify any errors or injustices that occurred in the discharge processing. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case;...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00368
________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOS recommends denial of the applicants request to upgrade his discharge and change his narrative reason for separation. DPSOS states that based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the applicants discharge, to include his characterization of service and his narrative reason for separation, was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge...