Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00206
Original file (BC-2010-00206.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00206 

 INDEX CODE: 137.00 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

Her records be corrected to reflect she made a timely election 
for spouse coverage under the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit 
Plan (RCSBP). 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

She was never briefed or informed on the requirements to elect 
spouse coverage under the RCSBP. She never received a letter 
informing her of her retirement options. The Air Force Reserve 
Center (AFRC) indicates they have a copy of a certified receipt 
in their system but she never received it. 

 

Applicant's complete submission is at Exhibit A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant after completing 20 years of satisfactory service 
was notified of her eligibility to participate in the RCSBP on 
11 Dec 97. She failed to make an election at that time and was 
automatically enrolled in Option A, Decline to make an election 
until age 60. 

 

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are 
contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the 
Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit B. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

ARPC/DPP recommends denial. AFRC/DPP notes they have the 
certified mail receipt in their system, but due to a technical 
error it is not accessible. AFRC/DPP further states the 


applicant failed to make an election within the mandatory time 
period required in accordance Title 10 U.S.C. 

 

The complete ARPC/DPP evaluation is at Exhibit B. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant 
on 16 Jul 10, for review and comment within 30 days. As of this 
date, no response has been received by this office. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took 
notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case. However, we agree with the opinion and 
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
(OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion 
that the applicant has failed to sustain her burden of proof of 
the existence of an error or injustice. Other than her own 
assertions, she has provided no evidence that she was not 
properly notified and advised of her eligibility to participate 
in RCSBP. In view of the above and in the absence of evidence to 
the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief 
sought in this application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of a material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that 
the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2010-00206 in Executive Session on 14 Sep 10, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 , Panel Chair 

 , Member 

 , Member 

 

The following documentary evidence was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 30 Dec 09. 

 Exhibit B. Letter, ARPC/DPP, dated 24 Jun 10, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 16 Jul 10. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03489

    Original file (BC-2005-03489.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Applicant states that her DFAS-CL 7220/48, Retiree Account Statement, shows an error for the RCSBP cost of $29.66 and request this error be corrected. She chose option C because their were no mention of RCSBP cost in Section VI, and the base personnel office did not make her aware of the cost associated with electing Option C. She never expected to pay for anything except for one payment for spouse...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-02505

    Original file (BC-2009-02505.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPP notes the ARPC Form 123, RCSBP Election Certificate, reflects the servicemember elected Option A, decline to make an election until age 60. The evidence of record shows that the applicant’s deceased husband, upon notification of his eligibility for retired pay at age 60, originally elected Option A under the RCSBP thereby electing not to make a decision regarding coverage for the applicant until he reached age 60. The evidence of record does show the deceased service member requested...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-00703

    Original file (BC-2009-00703.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-00703 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her late husband's records be changed to reflect that he elected to participate in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) with election (Option C) based on full retired pay during an Open Enrollment Season. We note the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00045

    Original file (BC-2006-00045.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    ARPC has no record of receiving an election request from the servicemember. The applicant, as a widow of a retirement eligible servicemember, apparently is eligible for other benefits, such as the Commissary, Base Exchange and Tricare. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01973

    Original file (BC-2006-01973.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPP recommends denial indicating that when a member is eligible for retirement, it is the member's responsibility to request to be transferred to the Retired Reserve. Had the member requested to transfer to the Retired Reserve, he would have been afforded another opportunity to make an election under the RCSBP program upon reaching age 60. The servicemember was notified of his eligibility...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00035

    Original file (BC-2007-00035.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-00035 INDEX CODE: 137.04 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 12 June 2008 ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her late husband’s marital status be changed from “single” to “married” in the year 2001, and that his records be changed to show he elected to participate in the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-01017

    Original file (BC-2009-01017.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of the application, the applicant submits a letter to her husband’s commander, the Air Reserve Personnel Center’s letter to her late husband, and her late husband’s death certificate. DPP states the former service member was required to make an RCSBP election within 90 days of receipt of notification; however, he did not make an election when eligible in 1990. The applicant’s complete response is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00332

    Original file (BC-2010-00332.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit B. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of a material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03468

    Original file (BC-2006-03468.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFRC/DPP recommends denial of the applicant’s request. He made no election during that time and was automatically enrolled in Option A, “Deferred election until age 60.” During the RCSBP Open Season...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC 2007 03576

    Original file (BC 2007 03576.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He elected RCSBP for the applicant. If the member loses his spouse by death or divorce, he has one year to effect a change in his election. When the former member filled out his application for retired pay he did not change his election to former spouse.