Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00275
Original file (BC-2010-00275.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00275 

 INDEX CODE: 112.02 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

___________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

1. She be promoted to the grade of airman first class (E-3) with an 
effective date of 8 Aug 09. 

 

2. She receive all back pay and allowances effective 8 Aug 09. 

 

___________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

She completed her Bachelors of Science degree in Engineering 
Manangement at Missouri University of Science and Technology on 
16 May 09. She received her degree prior to entering active duty 
on 10 Jun 09. 

 

In support of her request, the applicant provides a copy of a 
letter from the Chief of Education and Training, a copy of AFROTC 
IMT 22, Cadet Personnel Action Request, DD Form 785, Record of 
Disenrollment from Officer Candidate – Type Training, copies of 
letters from her commander and various other documentation 
associated with her request, copies of AFROTC IMT 111, Student 
Status Statement of Understanding, a copy of AFROTC IMT 10, Administrative Disenrollment Action Worksheet, a copy of DD Forms 
4/1 and 4/2, Enlistment/Reenlistment Document Armed Forces of the 
United States, a copy of AF IMT 1056, Air Force Reserve Officer 
Trainig Corps (AFROTC) Contract, excerpts from her medical records, 
a copy of AFROTC IMT 20, Application for AFROTC Membership, a copy 
of AFOATS Form 35, Certification II, a copy of her Certification of 
Involvements with Civil, Military or School Authorities/Law 
Enforcement Officials Forms, a copy of AF Form 2030, USAF Drug and 
Alcohol Abuse Certificate, a copy of AFROTC IMT 27, 2006 Field 
Training Performance Report, a copy of her special order, and a 
copy of AFROTC Form 16, Mandatory Counseling Requirements for 
CSP/POC Cadets During Term Reviews. 

 

Her complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. 

 

___________________________________________________________________ 

 

 

 

 


STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant enlisted into the Air Force Reserve on 17 Aug 04 in 
the grade of airman basic (E-1). She entered active duty on 10 Jun 
09 and was progressively promoted to the grade of airman first 
class effective and with a date of rank of 10 Oct 10. 

 

On 23 Feb 10, AFPC/DPSOA requested the applicant provide a copy of 
her transcript so they could determine if she had accumulated the 
necessary credits to receive an advance grade upon her initial 
enlistment; however, as of this date DPSOA has received no 
response. 

 

Additional relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted 
from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter 
prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force. 

 

___________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial. DPSOA states the applicant failed to 
maintain academic retention standards when she received three 
academic deficiencies and failed to maintain the required grade 
point average for two academic terms. According to her DD Form 
785, she breached/anticipatorily breached the AFROTC contract when 
she failed to enroll in the required AFROTC Fall courses in 2007. 
She stated she would not continue or accept a commission if one was 
offered to her. Per the governing AFI, members with 20 semester 
hours or more are authorized to enter the Air Force in the grade of 
airman (E-2) and members with 45 semester hours are authorized the 
grade of airman first class (E-3). However, in order to meet the 
requirement of entering the Air Force in a higher grade than airman 
basic (E-1), college credits must have been accomplished prior to 
entering the ROTC program. DPSOA notified the applicant that they 
must verify her college credits by reviewing her transcripts in 
order to determine her eligibility; however, the applicant has not 
responded. 

 

The DPSOA complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

___________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant 
on 8 Oct 10 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this 
date, this office has received no response. 

 

___________________________________________________________________ 

 

 

 


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was timely filed. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice 
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of 
the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its 
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has 
not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the 
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend 
granting the relief sought in this application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly 
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number 
BC-2010-00275 in Executive Session on 9 Nov 10, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 , Panel Chair 

 , Member 

 , Member 

 

The following documentary evidence was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 18 Jan 10, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 30 Aug 10. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 8 Oct 10. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 


 





Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-02486

    Original file (BC-2007-02486.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-02486 INDEX CODE: 128.10 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: Feb 09, 2009 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Air Force Reserve Officer Training Corps (AFROTC) debt and recoupment actions be terminated. On 17 Aug 05, he was notified of debt collection actions. We took notice of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03735

    Original file (BC-2005-03735.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    It would also allow the Air Force to determine if he was fit for continued military service and to take the appropriate action. They further noted the applicant claimed that his medical condition began while he was on active duty. Additionally, we note that even though the final decision of AFROTC headquarters was to disenroll him, his AFROTC Detachment commander had recommended he be returned to active duty so he could possibly receive medical attention for his illness.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02082

    Original file (BC-2012-02082.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    His Nurse Enlisted Commissioning Program (NECP) scholarship be reinstated. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force at Exhibits B, C and D. 2 ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAMN recommends denial of the applicant’s requests to have his NECP scholarship reinstated and that his DD...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01923

    Original file (BC-2005-01923.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    d. The applicant admitted to deceiving the Commander of the AFROTC Detachment (Det) and a professor by lying about a grade change. On 26 Jan 04, the AFROTC Det commander requested from HQ AFROTC the applicant be investigated for disenrollment. However, the captains stated the applicant arrived at about 1230 on 12 Nov 03 and within 15 to 20 minutes of the interview began to tell the truth about her actions on the PFT, the failed summer course, being signed into LLAB, and lying to the AFROTC...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04504

    Original file (BC-2011-04504.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: BC-2011-04504 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His numerical rating in Section IV, of his DD Form 785, Record of Disenrollment from Officer Candidate – Type Training, be changed from a “3-Should Not Be Considered Without Weighing the Needs of the Service Against the Reasons for Disenrollment,” to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01135

    Original file (BC-2004-01135.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    In support of her appeal, applicant provides a letter from her detachment stating that she disclosed her illness and medications before attending field training, a letter from her psychiatrist, copy of an e-mail message, and a letter from her AFROTC commander. On 15 Jan 03, a DD Form 785 was completed disenrolling the applicant from the AFROTC program effective 31 Mar 03 for medical disqualification by reason of bi-polar depression and failure to maintain military retention standards. We...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02408

    Original file (BC-2006-02408.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant states through her grandfather she was medically qualified for a commission in the Air Force, based on the physical examination conduced on 16 January 2004. Exhibit D. Letter, Applicant’s Grandfather, undated.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03587

    Original file (BC-2005-03587.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    However, they do recommend the applicant’s record be corrected to show that the time of his disenrollment he was on conduct probation not academic probation. HQ USAFA/JA opines the applicant was not prejudiced by the error and that the applicant was disenrolled for his Wing Honor Code violations The complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant’s counsel states in his response that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013300

    Original file (20130013300.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The reasons cited were due to her failure of the MS III course, failure to pass the CWST, and a drop in her physical fitness scores. On 30 August 2011 and again on 25 October 2012, the applicant's ROTC commanding officer recommended disenrollment due to failure to maintain academic standards in her MS class which resulted in a breach of her contract.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00607

    Original file (BC 2014 00607.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00607 COUNSEL: NONE INDICATED HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 785, Record of Disenrollment from Officer Candidate – Type Training, dated 27 September 2006, be corrected to reflect a rating of “1” – Highly Recommended or “2” – Recommended as an Average Candidate instead of “3” - Should Not Be Considered Without Weighing The ‘Needs of the Service’ Against...