AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04272
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-04272 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded to a general discharge. We also find no evidence which indicates the applicants service characterization, which had its basis in his conviction by general court-martial and was a part of the sentence of...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04276
It appears the applicant is requesting her separation with a 20% disability rating be changed to a medical retirement with a 100% disability rating. On 6 Jun 83, the applicant was discharged from the Air Force with severance pay with a disability rating of 20% On 21 Feb 85, she was discharged from the Air Force Reserve. Also that any future promotions, schooling, or awards could not be added to a DD Form 214 after the close out...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04279
DPSID states there is no evidence the original evaluation was inaccurate at the time it was completed nor is there any evidence that an injustice occurred. The complete DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPAOO5 does not provide a recommendation. The complete DPSOO evaluation is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 9 Aug 11, for...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04282
On 5 March 1970, the applicant was discharged with a general (under honorable conditions) discharge after completing a period of 1 year, 4 months and 13 days total active service. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D). ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINED THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04285
His record be corrected to reflect service in Vietman. The complete DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 11 February 2011, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days. After a thorough review of the available evidence and the applicant's complete submission, we find no evidence that his records should be corrected to...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04292
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-04292 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 3A, which denotes First-term airman who separates before completing 36 months (60 months for 6-year enlistee) on current enlistment and who has no known disqualifying factors or ineligibility conditions except grade, skill...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04295
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-04295 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be entitled to benefits under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIAR did not provide a recommendation. The complete AFRBA Legal Advisor...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04296
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-04296 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependents (spouse and son). The DPSI complete evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit B. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04307
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-04307 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His commission date be changed from 8 Nov 10 to 3 Sep 10. The Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD) General Council determined the appointment date is the date SECDEF approves the appointment or the date the oath was administered, whichever...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04317
He feels that his discharge narrative reason does not accurately reflect the right reason for being discharged. His medical condition should have warranted that he meet a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant recommends denial, as the applicant has not met the burden of proof of an error or injustice that warrants the desired change to his record.
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04319
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-04319 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reason for discharge be changed to reflect medical disability incurred while on active duty. On 24 April 2007, the applicant was notified of her commanders intent to discharge her from the Air Force. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04322
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-04322 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge characterization be changed to honorable and his grade of airman basic (AB/E-1) be changed to senior airman (SrA/E-4). He received a letter from Social Actions for failure to rehabilitate. The applicant...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04323
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-04323 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be entitled to benefits under the Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC) program. He now has been awarded service-connected disability compensation by the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) for cardiovascular disease and believes this...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04330
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-04330 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His character of service be upgraded from general (under honorable conditions) to honorable. He believes there is nothing in his records to support unsuitability for service, nor does it support any service characterization other than honorable. We...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04337
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-04337 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect his service in the United Kingdom and Republic of Korea. The complete DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04345
________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: NGB/A1POE recommends denial, stating, in part, other than his own claim that he was discriminated against, saying that the commander, was finally fired for sexual harassment, he provides no information concerning his discrimination claim. In his request, the applicant also states that his commander submitted paperwork for his promotion but the member does not state when that was or provide any...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04346
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-04346 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be amended to include award of the Air Force Combat Action Medal (AFCAM) and the Afghanistan Campaign Medal (ACM). DPSIDR states that his request for entitlement to the AFCAM has...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04351
On 11 January 2011, AFPC/DPSIDR wrote the applicant stating they were able to verify his entitlement for award of the VSM with one Bronze Service Star and the RVNGC w/P while serving with the 366th Munitions Maintenance Squadron, Takhli Air Base, Thailand, from 24 August 1972 to 4 October 1972; and, that his record would be corrected to reflect these awards. The complete AFPC/DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04354
On 30 Dec 10, AFPC/DPAPP notified the applicant they were able to verify his 4 years, 9 months, and 12 days of foreign service, which included service at Kadena AB, Japan during the period in question, and that his records would be corrected to reflect his foreign service accordingly. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04359
After a thorough and careful review of the evidence of record and the applicant's extensive submission, we are not persuaded that his record should be corrected to reflect he was a Prisoner of War (POW) and awarded the POW medal. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance;...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04364
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-04364 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial of the applicants request pertaining to credit for service in the Republic of Vietnam, indicating they are unable to verify such...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04365
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-04365 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he served in Vietnam and the Philippines (Philippines service administratively corrected). However, the DD Forms 1351-2, Travel Voucher or Subvoucher, was illegible and requested the applicant provide a legible...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04376
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-04376 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His rank at the time of his discharge be corrected to reflect (E-7) master sergeant versus (E-6) technical sergeant. His DD Form 214 reflects he was honorably retired in the grade of technical sergeant (E-6) effective 30 Sep 67, after serving 20...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04381
Specifically, it was discovered he had a history of migraine headaches. DPSOS states the documentation on file in the master personnel records supports the basis for the discharge and the applicants entry level separation. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04385
I understand my initial enlistment is the only opportunity to enroll in the CLRP and I permanently waive my CLRP enrollment option. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial. ________________________________________________________________ THE...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04392
On 7 Dec 07, the applicant was found unfit for military service due to her diagnosis of asthma by the Informal Physical Evaluation Board (IPEB) and was recommended for discharge with separation pay with a combined compensable rating of ten percent. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force which are attached at Exhibits C and...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04395
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which are attached at Exhibits C and D. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOS recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. Therefore, we believe the applicants records should be corrected as indicated below. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04396
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: While serving in Nha Trang Air Base, Republic of Vietnam, he was injured while seeking cover during a mortar attack. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and noting the applicants contentions, we are not persuaded that his injuries were the direct result of enemy action or friendly fire as required for award of the PH. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04397
His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, indicates his narrative reason for separation as Reduction in Force and his RE code as 4D. The remaining relevant facts, extracted from the military personnel records, are contained in the evaluations from the Air Force offices of primary responsibility at Exhibits C, D, E, and F. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOE recommends denial of the applicants...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04413 ADDENDUM
While the Air Force OPR found these documents sufficient to conclude he served in the Republic of Vietnam and issued him a boots on the ground letter, the Board was not convinced that he served in the Republic of Vietnam for the requisite 30 consecutive or 60 non-consecutive days to be eligible for the VSM and, by extension, the RVCM and denied his request. For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicants original request and the rationale of the earlier...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04415
The record shows the decedent elected not to participate at this time. The applicant stated the decedent was not married at the time of eligibility; however, the record shows Headquarters Air Reserve Personnel Center sent a spousal notification letter to the members spouse because the member did not make an election. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04418 ADDENDUM
________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSDC recommends denial of the applicants request for an increase in her deceased husbands CRSC rating to 100 percent, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. As for her request related to his cysts, we also do not find the evidence she has presented sufficient to conclude that his CRSC rating should be increased based on this condition. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04421
The IPEB recommended the applicant be placed on the TDRL with a 30 percent disability rating. ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant recommends a change of the record to reflect the applicant was placed on the TDRL with a 50 percent disability rating, effective the previously established date of TDRL placement, and that she was removed from the TDRL and retired permanently with a 30 percent disability...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04430
The applicant received the Article 15 in 2008 and the 2009 report was removed from his records, but the 2010 report was rendered under the supervision of new evaluators. Furthermore, no evidence was provided to support the contention that the 6 Mar 10 performance report was the result of the Article 15. The complete AFPC/DPSOE evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He did...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04434
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-04434 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be changed to a medical discharge. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The AFBCMR Medical Consultant recommends denying the request...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04446
The board convened on 8 March 2010 and the report was not finalized until 10 April 2010, after the board adjourned. DPSOO states the absence of the 11 February 2010 OPR does not constitute an error since the report was not required to be filed in the applicants record until 60 days after the close out date, or 13 April 2010. The complete DPSOO evaluation is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04464
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTS recommends the requested relief be denied. However, these assertions and the documentation provided are not sufficient to convince us the applicant...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04486
and his affidavit, the letter she received from General H., the accounts of this mission by W.S., who flew out of Takhli that day, the affidavit of her father's best friend, the letters from MGen M., and her recollections as a child (her birth certificate verifies kinship, Exhibit N), it is apparent that her father died while trying to save the life of his wingman, Capt B. The applicant provided as evidence a personal affidavit. (Exhibit I) and her father's commander, Col. E.M. (Exhibits L...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04487
The complete DPSIDEP evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant contends there are multiple administrative errors and this is an injustice because of her medical condition. She was never given a feedback during this rating period. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04491
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID does not provide a recommendation. Therefore, the board members were aware that he had completed his dissertation and the requirements for the PhD Degree. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC- 2010-04491 in Executive Session on 23 Aug 11, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Panel...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04501
On 17 December 1996, the applicant was notified of his commanders intent to initiate an officer grade determination (OGD) action, in accordance with (IAW) AFI 36-3203, Service Retirements. On 26 December 1996, the Air Force Recruiting Squadron, Judge Advocate (AFRS/JA) reviewed the OGD package, including matters submitted by the applicant, and concluded the applicant should be retired in the grade of lieutenant colonel. The AFRS/CC recommended to the AETC/CC that the applicant be retired...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04510
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The Narrative Summary states her condition of patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS) was not present at the time of the medical history intake and physical examination and the doctor crossed out Existed Prior to Enlistment. She did not have knee problems prior to her enlistment. Therefore, someone at the Review Board Office must have agreed with her and the physician of record that her condition was...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04512
We took notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the merits of the case, however; we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2010-04512 in Executive Session on 4 Aug...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04515
DFAS states that at the time of the applicants retirement, he elected coverage for his then spouse. The complete BCMR Legal Advisors evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE AND BCMR LEGAL CONSULTANTS EVALUATIONS: The applicant responds with numerous questions that would be more appropriately answered by the Air Force office of primary responsibility or DFAS, once the Board has...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04520
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-04520 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. He was misled to believe that the leave days would automatically be paid to him at the time of his retirement; however, he was later advised by the Military Pay Office that there would be an audit which would settle any discrepancies. The...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04534
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-04534 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code of 4C (Separated for concealment of juvenile records, minority, failure to meet physical standards for enlistment, failure to attain a 9.0 reading grade level as measured by the Air Force Reading Abilities Test, or...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04541
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-04541 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Air Force Form 910, Enlisted Performance Report (EPR), rendered for the period of 31 Mar 07 to 30 Mar 08, be declared void and removed from his records. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04551
After considering all the facts and evidence presented, the board found by a preponderance of the evidence the applicant committed an indecent act and endeavored to impede a criminal investigation. On 9 Nov 07, SAFPC completed a dual-action review of the applicants disability and administrative separation cases and on 20 Nov 07, the Secretarys designee directed he be administratively discharged, with service characterized as General (Under Honorable Conditions). A complete copy of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04554
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-04554 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His three non-selections for promotion to the grade of major (O-4) be removed from his records so he can be accessed into the Air National Guard (ANG). Also, his latest OPR was not considered during his active duty promotion boards. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04557
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicants request to void the contested report. The complete AFPC/DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR...