Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04365
Original file (BC-2010-04365.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-04365 

 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His records be corrected to reflect he served in Vietnam and the 
Philippines (Philippines service administratively corrected). 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

He served in Vietnam and the Philippines in December, January and 
February of 1968. 

 

In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of 
documents extracted from his military personnel records. 

 

Applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant’s records reflect that he served on active duty from 
26 Aug 65 to 21 Dec 68, with 11 months and 19 days of Foreign 
Service. 

 

The applicant’s performance report for the period 27 Aug 67 
through 5 Jun 68 states the applicant was sent to Tan Son Nhut AB, 
Republic of Vietnam (RVN) for 30 days. 

 

Special Order No. T-327 reflects the applicant was authorized 
Temporary Duty (TDY) in the Philippines from 5 Feb 68 for 21 days; 
and Special Order No. T-109 reflects the applicant was authorized 
TDY to the Philippines from 31 Jul 68 for 15 days. 

 

On 1 Feb 11, AFPC/DPAPP informed the applicant they were able to 
confirm he was assigned in the Philippines and TDY in Vietnam. 
However, the DD Forms 1351-2, Travel Voucher or Subvoucher, was 
illegible and requested the applicant provide a legible copy in 
order to determine the amount of time he was in Vietnam. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 


AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

HQ AFPC/DPAPP states they were able to confirm boots on ground for 
the Philippines, but was unable to verify his service in Vietnam. 
DPAPP requested the applicant provide legible documentation to 
substantiate his service in Vietnam. The applicant did not 
respond. DPAPP recommends the Board review documentation to 
determine whether it warrants approval of Vietnam service. 

 

The complete AFPC/DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant 
on 6 May 11, for review and comment within 30 days. As of this 
date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D). 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 

3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate 
the existence of an injustice. After a thorough review of the 
evidence presented, we believe a reasonable basis exists to 
conclude the applicant served in Vietnam. In this respect, we 
note that his performance report closing 5 Jun 68 reflects he “was 
sent to Tan Son Nhut AB, RVN for thirty days.” In view of the 
above, and in recognition of his service to the Nation, we 
recommend the applicant’s records be corrected as indicated below. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: 

 

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force 
relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that he had boots on 
the ground in Tan Son Nhut AB, Vietnam, for 30 days. 

__________________________________________________________________ 

 

 

 

 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number 
BC-2010-04365 in Executive Session on 26 Jul 11, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 


 

, Panel Chair 

, Member 

, Member 

 

All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The 
following documentary evidence was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Forms 149, dated 15 Nov 10, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPAPP, dated 22 Apr 11. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 6 May 11. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02676

    Original file (BC-2011-02676.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In support of his request, the applicant submits a copy of his DD Form 214, and eight copies of his AF Forms 626, Temporary Duty Order – Military, with dates ranging from April 1966 through June 1967. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial of the request to show Vietnam service, and states, in part, they were able to verify and confirm the applicant’s foreign service at Clark Air Base, Republic of the Philippines,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03549

    Original file (BC-2012-03549.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03549 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His military personnel records be corrected to reflect he served in the Republic of Vietnam and Southeast Asia from 10 Jul 67 through 11 Jan 68. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01385

    Original file (BC-2012-01385.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility which are included at Exhibits C and D. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends approval, indicating there is evidence of an error or injustice. The applicant’s DD Form 214 accurately reflects his Foreign Service Credit for his assignment to Clark Air Base but does not show...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02237

    Original file (BC 2013 02237.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In this respect, the applicant provides a detailed account of his temporary duty at Tan Son Nhut AB, Vietnam, in 1972 with supporting documentation showing he was issued an M-16. With respect to a comment in the DPAPP advisory opinion that the information provided by the applicant “did not contain information that reflects [the applicant] served in Vietnam,” that documentation does contain evidence that the applicant served in Vietnam: his detailed statement attached to his application. We...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00338

    Original file (BC-2007-00338.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-00338 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 2 AUGUST 2008 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect credit for a TDY to Vietnam in 1968. In support of his request, applicant provided page four of his Airman Military Record, AF Form 7, which is a...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01561

    Original file (BC 2014 01561.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01561 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he served in the Republic of Vietnam. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial, indicating that after a thorough review of the applicant’s...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03687

    Original file (BC-2010-03687.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial of boots on ground in Vietnam, stating, in part, that the applicant’s master personnel records and the documentation submitted failed to provide any evidence that substantiates foreign service time in Vietnam. While it is not conclusive that the applicant served in the Republic of Vietnam, we find the submitted evidence to be credible and consistent with his statements and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-02107

    Original file (BC-2007-02107.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-02107 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: Jan 06, 2009 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect service in Viet Nam. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03321

    Original file (BC-2010-03321.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DPAPP complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial of the VSM and RVNCM. The DPSIDR complete evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 10 Dec 10 for review and comment within 30 days. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00778

    Original file (BC-2011-00778.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPAPP is unable to confirm the applicant spent any time in Vietnam based on his Master Personnel Records and requested additional information from the applicant. ___________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission...