Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04415
Original file (BC-2010-04415.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-04415 

COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

Her late husband’s record be changed to reflect he made an 
election for spouse coverage under the Reserve Component Survivor 
Benefit Plan (RCSBP). 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

Her late husband served many years in the military just waiting 
for the day he would turn 60 to be eligible to draw his Reserve 
retirement. At the time he was notified that he was retirement 
eligible and had the opportunity to elect RCSBP, he was divorced; 
therefore, he did not make an election. She is currently drawing 
her late husband’s civil service retirement which indicates she 
would be the proper beneficiary to draw his Reserve retirement 
upon his death. His death occurred only six months after his 
diagnosis and during that time his mind was not thinking about 
his RCSBP election. She would greatly appreciate the Board’s 
decision to allow her to draw his Reserve retired pay. 

 

In support of her appeal, the applicant provides copies of her 
late husband’s death certificate and an Air Reserve Personnel 
Center notification of retirement eligibility. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The decedent was a former member of the Air Force Reserve who was 
progressively promoted to the grade of technical sergeant (E-6). 

 

The remaining relevant fact, extracted from the decedent’s 
military service records are contained in the evaluation by the 
Air Force office of primary responsibility at Exhibit B. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 


AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

ARPC/DPT recommends denial. DPT states the former member was 
notified of his completion of the required years of service under 
the provisions of Title 10, United States Code (USC), Section 
1331, to be entitled to Reserve retired pay upon application at 
age 60. In addition, the notification informed him of his 
eligibility to participate in the RCSBP. He made no election 
during that time; therefore, he was automatically enrolled in 
Option A (Declined to make an election until age 60) in 
accordance with Title 10, USC, Section 1448. 

 

DPT indicates that during open enrollment season, 1 March 1999 
through February 2000, members who had elected less than full 
coverage or no coverage for their spouse/children were able to 
change their election to cover their families. The record shows 
the decedent elected not to participate at this time. Members 
had another opportunity to participate in the RCSBP open 
enrollment during the 1 October 2005 through 30 September 2006 
open season. The record shows the decedent also elected not to 
participate at this time. 

 

The applicant stated the decedent was not married at the time of 
eligibility; however, the record shows Headquarters Air Reserve 
Personnel Center sent a spousal notification letter to the 
member’s spouse because the member did not make an election. The 
postal receipt was signed for on 19 February 1991. 

 

DPT states that in view of the fact the decedent was eligible for 
retired pay at age 60, the applicant is eligible for an 
Identification Card, Base-Exchange and Commissary priviledges. 
She is also eligible to apply for medical and dental benefits 
through the TRICARE program. She also may be eligible for 
benefits through the Veterans Administration. 

 

The complete DPT evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit B. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant 
on 28 January 2011, for review and comment within 30 days. As of 
this date, this office has received no response. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 


 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or an injustice. We took 
notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and 
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the 
applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. 
Thererfore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find 
no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this 
application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

HE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2010-04415 in Executive Session on 9 August 2011, under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 , Panel Chair 

 , Member 

 , Member 

 

The following documentary evidence was considered in connection 
with AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2010-04415: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 16 Nov 10, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Letter, ARPC/DPT, dated 5 Jan 11, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 28 Jan 11. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00973

    Original file (BC-2012-00973.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPTT states that in view of the fact that the decedent would have been eligible for retired pay at age 60, the applicant is eligible for an Identification Card and Base-Exchange and Commissary privileges effective 6 March 2000. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0201652

    Original file (0201652.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The member remained eligible to make the election at age 60. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant’s Congressman statement, dated 31 Jul 02.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-01652

    Original file (BC-2002-01652.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The member remained eligible to make the election at age 60. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant’s Congressman statement, dated 31 Jul 02.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00978

    Original file (BC-2007-00978.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    Her husband was notified of his eligibility to participate in the RCSBP by letter dated 28 December 1988. He made no election within 90 days of receipt of notification, and was automatically enrolled in Option A, “Deferred Election Until Age 60.” During the RCSBP Open Seasons 1 April 1992 through 31 March 1993, and 1 March 1999 through 29 February 2000, members who had elected less than full coverage or no coverage for their spouse/children were able to change their election to cover their...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03156

    Original file (BC-2012-03156.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The decedent did not elect to participate during this Open Season. In view of the above, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. You have the right to submit newly discovered relevant evidence for consideration by the Board.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00389

    Original file (BC-2010-00389.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Her late husband’s record is in error because at the time of his death, he was eligible for Reserve retirement pursuant to Title 10, United States Code (USC), Section 12731, thereby making his spouse eligible to receive RCSBP effective the date of his death, 19 Oct 09. The member was notified, by letter, of his eligibility to participate in the RCSBP in 2000 and that he had 90 days in which to make an...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01076

    Original file (BC-2007-01076.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    She retired in June 2004 and noticed she had been given several RCSBP election options that her now deceased spouse would have had but did not. She contends her spouse should have had the same paperwork at his retirement. She notes her husband was retired prior to his death and should have been given the same options all other retired members receive; such as an opportunity to update his election.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-01017

    Original file (BC-2009-01017.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of the application, the applicant submits a letter to her husband’s commander, the Air Reserve Personnel Center’s letter to her late husband, and her late husband’s death certificate. DPP states the former service member was required to make an RCSBP election within 90 days of receipt of notification; however, he did not make an election when eligible in 1990. The applicant’s complete response is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00035

    Original file (BC-2007-00035.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-00035 INDEX CODE: 137.04 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 12 June 2008 ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her late husband’s marital status be changed from “single” to “married” in the year 2001, and that his records be changed to show he elected to participate in the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-00703

    Original file (BC-2009-00703.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-00703 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her late husband's records be changed to reflect that he elected to participate in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) with election (Option C) based on full retired pay during an Open Enrollment Season. We note the...