AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02844
The applicant has provided no evidence of a clear error or injustice related to the nonjudicial punishment action. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02855
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-02855 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable discharge be upgraded to general (under honorable conditions). On 10 Sep 57, the discharge authority approved the Discharge for Unfitness. Having found insufficient evidence of an error or injustice with regard to the...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02857
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-02857 INDEX CODE: 110.00 APPLICANT COUNSEL: None SSN HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reenlistment code (RE) be changed to allow her to join the Air Force Reserve. The applicant’s commander notified her on 6 July 1989, that he was not recommending her for promotion because she received an Article...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02859
A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant asserts that while there is no requirement for rating chains to include PME or command comments, absence of these comments was intentionally made to exclude him from promotion. Further, he believes this alleged bias against him caused the rater and additional rater to omit PME and command recommendations on the...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02860
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-02860 INDEX CODE 131.01 COUNSEL: No HEARING DESIRED: Yes _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be given Special Selection Board (SSB) consideration by the Calendar Year 2000A (CY00A) and CY01B Central Colonel Selection Boards and the 2000 and 2001 Senior Service School (SSS) selection boards. The presence of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02863
At that time, an Air Force Form 1466 (Medical and Educational Clearance for Travel) was initiated, which officially prevented his son from joining him at his duty station until the required medical care was available or his son no longer needed such care. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ USAF/DPPCC recommends that the applicant’s request for FSA be denied. Specifically, the applicant states 37 U.S.C., Section 427(c)(2), authorizes...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02866
A complete copy of the ARPC/DPB evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant reviewed the advisory opinion and furnished a response indicating that as a result of administrative corrections to his position, he now has all the requirements to meet a position vacancy board: time in grade, a valid lieutenant colonel position, and the intent to nominate. Based on the assumption that...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02870
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-02870 INDEX CODE: 131.09 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be considered for assignment to a general officer position. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ USAF/REPS recommended denial noting that the applicant was notified on 20 Jul...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02871
INDEX CODE 110.02 AFBCMR BC-2002-02871 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Staff and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02872
INDEX CODE 110.02 AFBCMR BC-2002-02871 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Staff and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02875
Since his medical condition was not the reason for discharge from the Air Force, and he was medically fit for duty, he was not eligible for disability discharge from the Air Force. The complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPD recommends denial of the applicant’s request. The complete evaluation is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A newly assigned counsel for the applicant’s case responded that...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02877
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPO recommended denial and states that although the PME recommendation on the applicant’s 17 June 1999 and June 2000 OPRs was incorrect, his officer selection brief (OSB) reflected completion of ISS in 1997. The selection board had his entire selection record that clearly outlined his accomplishments since the date he came on active duty. ROBERT S. BOYD Panel Chair AFBCMR 02-02877 MEMORANDUM FOR...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02878
He was separated from the Air Force on 15 July 2002. However, after reviewing the applicant’s request and the evidence of record, we find the narrative reason for his entry- level separation; i.e., entry-level performance and conduct, to be overly harsh. CHARLENE M. BRADLEY Panel Chair AFBCMR 02-02326 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02886
INDEX CODE: 112.02 AFBCMR BC-2002-02886 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02889
The applicant’s counsel states the only evidence of the applicant’s failure was his arrest on 4 September 1997 on the charge of pedestrian under the influence. In a letter, dated 7 October 1997, the commander notified the applicant of his intent to initiate administrative discharge action against him for failure in the SART program. On 13 February 2001, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered and denied applicant’s request that his discharge be upgraded.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02890
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 23 Jul 97 and was assigned to Keesler AFB, MS. On 19 Mar 98, he was notified of his commander’s intention to recommend discharge for minor disciplinary infractions with a general characterization. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C. HQ AFPC/DPPAE asserts the applicant’s RE code of “2C” [sic] (Involuntarily separated with an honorable...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02895
Applicant has also requested that his discharge be upgraded to honorable. After reviewing applicant’s overall record of service and based on the fact that under today’s standards he would receive an honorable discharge, we recommend approval of his request for an upgrade of his discharge. Show that on 26 April 1957, he was honorably discharged in the grade of master sergeant and furnished an Honorable Discharge Certificate.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02903
He received an RE code of 2C, which defined means “Involuntary separation with honorable discharge; or entry-level separation without characterization of service.” _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant found that no change to applicant’s record was warranted. AFPC/DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit D. AFPC/DPPAE verified that the RE code of 2C was correct. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02904
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-02904 INDEX CODE: 110.10 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His bad conduct discharge (BCD) be changed to reflect that he was honorably discharged for medical reasons in the grade of sergeant. There is no legal basis for upgrading his discharge. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02907
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Applicant enlisted in the Army Air Force on 14 October 1940 as an Air Cadet and was honorably discharged on 12 December 1940 for not completing flight training. Applicant’s records show that he first inquired about a “blanket promotion” opportunity for airmen returning from New Guinea in a letter to the Adjutant dated 6 October 1943. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dtd 8 Nov 02.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02908
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force at Exhibits C and D. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPR recommends disapproval. The applicant has not provided any documentation showing that his request was submitted through administrative channels to the final approval authority for...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02910
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-02910 INDEX CODE: 131.05 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXXXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: Yes ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His current date of rank (DOR) to the grade of Senior Airman (SrA) (E-4) be adjusted to his previous DOR of 28 April 1992. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02913
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-02913 INDEX CODE: 121.00 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NO XXXXXXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be paid for 33 days of accrued leave. Based on non-availability of records to verify the applicant did or did not receive payment of accrued leave, DFAS recommends denial (see Exhibit C). However, his DD...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02914
For this conduct, he received a Letter of Counseling (LOC), dated 6 October 1999. The commander indicated in his recommendation for discharge action that before recommending this discharge, he had given the applicant three LORs, two LOCs, and four MFRs as methods of rehabilitation. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02916
Applicant was discharged from the Air Force on 6 Mar 02. The consultant states that a lab slip dated 27 Mar 02 is in her medical records indicating a positive pregnancy test. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02917
He was discharged from the Air Force on 20 Jul 90. The Medical Consultant states that he was administratively discharged for repeated failure to maintain his weight within Air Force standards. Exhibit D. letter, AFPC/DPPAE, dated 18 Dec 02 Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 10 Jan 03.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02922
After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant’s submission, the majority of the Board is not persuaded that deceased member’s records should be altered so that she would receive an SBP annuity. _________________________________________________________________ RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD: A majority of the panel finds insufficient evidence of error or injustice and recommends the application be denied. A majority found that applicant had not provided sufficient evidence of...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02929
After considering all the matters presented, his commander determined that he committed one or more of the offenses alleged and imposed punishment on the applicant. We find no evidence of error in this case and after thoroughly reviewing the documentation provided in support of his appeal, we are not persuaded that he has suffered an injustice. After considering the matters raised by the applicant, the commander determined that the applicant had committed "one or more of the offenses...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02932
A 4 August 2000 entry in his medical records reveals that the applicant was hospitalized for cellulitis. Based on the evidence provided they recommend the requested relief be denied (Exhibit D). _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02934
In the first Article 15 action, the applicant failed to return from approved leave. The applicant’s commander punished him under Article 15 for his absence, imposing 30 days correctional custody. A complete copy of their evaluation is attached at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 17 January 2003, copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to applicant for review and response within 30 days.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02937
Available Department of Veterans Administration (DVA) medical documentation shows that in 1999 she still reported symptoms of the conditions for which she was disability discharged. The documentation provided is insufficient to show that the applicant is now fit for active duty. Therefore, we agree with the opinions and recommendations of the BCMR Medical Consultant and the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02938
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-02938 INDEX CODE: 100.03, 100.06 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed to one that would allow him to enlist in the Air National Guard. Based on the review of his case file, his RE code 2C, “Involuntarily separated with an honorable...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02941
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-02941, Case 2 XXXXXXXXXX INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: None XXX-XX-XXXX HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Separation Code and his reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed so he can enlist the Air Force Reserve. The commander recommended an honorable discharge. The applicant is requesting his...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02943
The applicant, while serving in the grade of airman basic, was discharged from the Air Force on 3 August 1984 under the provisions of AFR 39-10 (Misconduct - Pattern of Conduct Prejudicial to Good Order and Discipline) with a general (under honorable conditions) discharge. Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Clarksburg, West Virginia, provided an investigative report which is attached at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02945
He was not present to receive the award because he was in the hospital. The applicant has not provided any documentation showing he was recommended for a DFC, nor has he provided any documentation showing he was eligible to receive the DFC. However, should the applicant provide documentation pertaining to the units he was assigned, statements from crewmembers and proof of his POW status, this Board would be willing to review the materials for possible reconsideration.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02947
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-02947 INDEX CODE: 100.03, 100.06 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed to one that would allow her to enlist in the Air National Guard. She served 3 months and 8 days on active duty and was issued an RE code of...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02949
We see no evidence of an error in this case and after a thorough review of the evidence of record, we do not believe he has been the victim on an injustice. Therefore, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 8 Nov 02.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02951
On 12 Jul 00, the applicant was notified by her squadron commander that he intended to recommend her discharge from the Air Force for disobeying a direct order to take the Anthrax Vaccination, with a general (under honorable conditions) discharge. The complete evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 20 Dec 02 for review and...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02954
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-02954 INDEX NUMBER: 113.00 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXX-XX-XXXX HEARING DESIRED: No __________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His extended active duty (EAD) order, Special Order A-2009, dated 1 May 02, be amended to change his effective date of duty from 17 Jun 02 to 16 Jun 02. The Board notes that although the applicant...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02955
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-02955 INDEX NUMBER: 128.10 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXX-XX-XXXX HEARING DESIRED: No ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reenlistment on 14 Jan 02 be changed to 17 Jan 02. The window to get the SRB recomputed was if the member reenlisted between 2 Jan 02 and 16 Jan 02 and had a DOS of 17 Jan 02 or later. We took...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02964
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-02964 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His date of rank (DOR) to SSgt (E-5) be corrected from 6 Feb 01 to 1 Jan 96, his DOR when he served in the U.S. Army. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record, the Board majority believes that it is not unreasonable to believe that the...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02975
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPW recommends the application be denied due to lack of sufficient evidence to support the applicant’s claim. Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 11 Sep 02. Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPW, dated 3 Dec 02, w/atch Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 13 Dec 02.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02976
His spouse signed the DD form 2526, Section XI, SBP Spouse Concurrence, her agreement for not receiving full coverage. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPP reviewed the applicant’s case file and recommends disapproval. After reviewing the evidence of record, we are not persuaded that the applicant has been the victim of an error or injustice.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02977
Applicant was warned of an impending demotion in grade from SRA to Airman First Class (A1C/E-3) as a result of his non-participation. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02981
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-02981 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Officer Selection Brief (OSB) prepared for consideration by the Calendar Year 2001B (CY01B) Central Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board be amended in the “Assignment History” section to reflect his level of assignment as the Department of the Defense...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02982
On 1 December 1997, the applicant submitted an appeal to the Evaluation Reports Appeal Board (ERAB) requesting her EPR for the period 11 January 1999 through 15 September 1999 be upgraded from an overall “4” to an overall “5.” On 21 September 2000, the ERAB notified the applicant’s military personnel office that her appeal was considered and denied. The AFPC/DPPPWB evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02986
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-02986 INDEX NUMBER: 112.00 XXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXX-XX-XXXX HEARING DESIRED: No ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The period of lost time, 14 Sep 01 through 2 Nov 01 reflected on her DD Form 214 be removed. Her commander at the time she separated from service indicated on an AF Form 2098 that the period from 14 Sep 01...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02988
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-02988 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His record be corrected to reflect the award of the Purple Heart Medal. He was informed, that until his VA physical examination, there was no evidence in his medical records that he had a scar on his arm or that he had been wounded...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02991
On 26 February 1997, he failed to report for duty at the prescribed time of 0730. The commander indicated in his recommendation for discharge action that before recommending this discharge, the applicant was given several opportunities to improve his conduct. Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPPAE, dated 28 January 2003.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02992
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPAE indicated that the applicant’s RE code of 2C (Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service) is correct. AFPC/JA stated that the applicant’s arrest record could have been a basis for rejecting him from Air Force service. The evidence of record reflects that the applicant was discharged with an entry level separation for fraudulent entry based on...