RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-02955
INDEX NUMBER: 128.10
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None
XXX-XX-XXXX HEARING DESIRED: No
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Her reenlistment on 14 Jan 02 be changed to 17 Jan 02.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
She was denied the higher Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) due to the
short notice release of the SRB listing.
The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The pertinent facts pertaining to this application are contained in the
evaluation prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force found at
Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPAE recommends denial of the applicant’s request. The applicant
enlisted 14 Jan 98 which gave her a date of separation (DOS) of 13 Jan
02. She then reenlisted on 14 Jan 02 for 4 years and 0 months. On 17
Jan 02, HQ USAF released a new SRB list and announced that affected
personnel should be briefed. The window to get the SRB recomputed was
if the member reenlisted between 2 Jan 02 and 16 Jan 02 and had a DOS
of 17 Jan 02 or later.
The complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on
(date) for review and comment within 30 days. To
date, a response has not been received.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant's
complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we
agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of
primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our
conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or
injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we
find no compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought in
this application.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number 02-02955 in
Executive Session on 6 March 2003, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Joseph A. Roj, Panel Chair
Ms. Barbara J. White-Olson, Member
Mr. Roscoe Hinton, Jr., Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 5 Sep 02, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Memorandum, AFPC/DPPAE, dated 3 Jan 03.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MIBR, dated 17 Jan 03.
JOSEPH A. ROJ
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03891
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-03891 INDEX NUMBER: 112.00 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXX-XX-XXXX HEARING DESIRED: No ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The extension of her enlistment she entered into on 13 Dec 01 be corrected to reflect inclusive dates of 5 Jul 04 to 4 Jan 05. ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS...
Members of the Board Mr. Joseph A. Roj, Mr. E. David Hoard, and Mr. William H. Anderson, considered this application on 18 June 2002. JOSEPH A. ROJ Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, AFPC/DPPAE, dtd 1 Jun 02 AFBCMR 02-01160 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02986
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-02986 INDEX NUMBER: 112.00 XXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXX-XX-XXXX HEARING DESIRED: No ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The period of lost time, 14 Sep 01 through 2 Nov 01 reflected on her DD Form 214 be removed. Her commander at the time she separated from service indicated on an AF Form 2098 that the period from 14 Sep 01...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02327
His sentence was reduced to reduction to the grade of airman (E-2), three months confinement, and forfeiture of $400.00 per month for three months. The complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 10 Jan 03 for review and comment within 30 days. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of...
A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPAE states the RE code the applicant received is the appropriate code for those members separated "involuntarily with an honorable discharge or an entry level separation without characterization of service (Exhibit D). _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 24 May 2002, for...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03679
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPAE recommends the application be denied. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D). We note that, since the applicant was not in a required 5-skill level...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00097
She was briefed that she was entitled to an SRB for the 16 months of her second extension. The extension contract provided clearly shows she was counseled she was entitled to the SRB. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the Air Force office of primary responsibility that the error on her one-month extension contract indicating her entitlement to an SRB, is administrative in nature and does not, in itself, authorize...
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Applicant contracted his initial enlistment in the Regular Air Force on 15 May 96 for a period of 4 years. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force at Exhibits C and D. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE...
Members of the Board Mr. Joseph A. Roj, Mr. John E. Pettit and Mr. Laurence M. Groner, considered this application on 25 April 2002. JOSEPH A. ROJ Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, AFPC/DPPAE, dtd 1 APR 02 AFBCMR 02-00527 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military...
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied the member's request to change her reason for discharge on 7 April 1997. A DD Form 215, Correction to DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, has been completed to correct these errors, and is now filed in the member’s records. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of an...