RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00096
INDEX CODE: 110.02
COUNSEL: None
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His DD Form 214, Block 28, Narrative Reason for Separation, be changed to
read “Officer Training Program - Separation is at the convenience of the
government” and Block 18, Remarks Section, add the statement “Separated
into Professional Officer Course – Early Release Program.”
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The reasons the applicant believes the records to be in error or unjust and
the evidence submitted in support of the appeal is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the
applicant's military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the
appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit B.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPRS recommends the application be denied. DPPRS states that the
discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements
of the discharge regulation.
The Air Force evaluation is at Exhibit B.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant
on 1 February 2002, for review and response. As of this date, this office
has received no response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of probable error or injustice. We took notice of the
applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however,
we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of
primary responsibility that his DD Form 214, Certificate of Discharge from
Active Duty, is consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements
of the discharge regulation and adopt their rationale as the basis for our
conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or
injustice. Other than his own assertions, the applicant has provided no
evidence which, in our opinion, adequately refutes the assessment of his
case. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no
compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this
application.
___________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of probable material error or injustice; that the application
was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will
only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant
evidence not considered with this application.
___________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive
Session on 3 April 2002, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Charles E. Bennett, Panel Chair
Mr. Joseph A. Roj, Member
Mr. Thomas J. Topolski, Jr, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 6 Jan 02, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPPRS, dated 28 Jan 02.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MIBR, dated 1 Feb 02.
CHARLES E. BENNETT
Panel Chair
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-01987 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His uncharacterized entry-level separation be upgraded to an honorable discharge. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letters prepared by the...
On 22 September 1980, applicant's commander recommended discharge for drug abuse as evidenced by a Memo for Record dated 17 June 1980, which revealed applicant admitted to personal use of marijuana on several occasions. On 11 December 1987, the Air Force Discharge Review Board reviewed and denied the applicant's request for upgrade. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant’s submission, we are not persuaded that his discharge should be upgraded to honorable.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03483
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-03483 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: American Legion HEARING DESIRED: Yes _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. On 6 April 1987, she received another Article 15 that imposed reduction in grade to Airman Basic (AB/E-1) for two additional charges...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03705
After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant's submission, we are not persuaded that the actions taken against him were improper, contrary to the provisions of the governing regulations in effect at the time, or based on factors other than his own misconduct. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC- 2002-03705 in Executive Session on 23 April 2003, under the provisions of AFI...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | bc-2002-04016
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-04016 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: Jerry Berry HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to honorable. The applicant appealed to the Discharge Review Board (DRB) to upgrade his discharge. (Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03800
___________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Applicant contracted his enlistment in the Regular Air Force on 24 February 1957. On 15 June 1960, the applicant was notified that he was being recommended for discharge due to the Air Force considering him unfit to serve further. Having found no error or injustice with regard to the actions that occurred while the applicant was a military member, we conclude that no basis exists to grant favorable...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-02272 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Block 13A, Character of Service, be changed to something better than “Under Other Than Honorable Conditions.” _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: When he returned...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02576
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-02576 INDEX CODE: 100.06 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 4H be changed. Applicant was honorably discharged on 30 Nov 98 under the provisions of AFI 36-3208 (Hardship) and assigned an RE code of 4H (Serving suspended punishment pursuant to Article 15,...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02496
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: 02-02496 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His time spent completing his degree on the Educational Delay Program (EDP) be recalculated to provide 100% credit so that his date of rank (DOR) to second lieutenant (2LT) would be 1 July 2000, rather than 6 January 2001. We find it troubling that, had...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02854
The applicant’s flight commander recommended the applicant be eliminated from the course and discharged from the Air Force because of his inability to adapt to requirements of the Intel career field or the Air Force. DPPRS notes the applicant did not submit any evidence or identify any errors or injustices that occurred in the discharge processing, nor did he provide any facts warranting a change to his reenlistment eligibility code. ...