Given the unequivocal support from the senior Air Force officers involved, and having no plausible reason to doubt their integrity in this matter, we believe that the contested OPR should be declared void and replaced with a corrected OPR, and that he should be considered by SSB for promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel. Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPPO, dated 20 Feb 02 Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 1 Mar 02. CHARLENE M. BRADLEY Panel Chair AFBCMR 02-00148 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF...
DPPPR further states that the fact remains that the applicant has again requested award of the SSM for his actions on 27 May 1944 and they don’t believe the Air Force should usurp the Army’s position and decision. Applicant’s contentions are duly noted; however, the Board finds no evidence of error in this case and after thoroughly reviewing the documentation that has been submitted in support of applicant’s appeal, we do not believe he has suffered from an injustice. Exhibit C. Letter,...
He would not have enlisted in the Air Force if not for the guarantee he received from the recruiter. On 22 June 1998, he signed a statement indicating he was a homosexual and he requested he be discharged from the Air Force for homosexual conduct. The DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPAE states that RE code 2C, “Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service” is correct.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: 02-00157 INDEX CODE 100.06 110.02 COUNSELS: None HEARING DESIRED: Yes _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 1985 general discharge be upgraded to honorable and his reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of “2B” (Separated with a general or under-other-than-honorable conditions discharge) be changed so that he can enlist in the Army. ...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00158 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general discharge be upgraded to honorable. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS states although there is a lack of documenation in the file to discuss his discharge, they...
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPRS states the applicant did not provide any new evidence or identify any errors or injustices that occurred in the processing of his discharge. They recommend the request be denied (Exhibit D). _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00161 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the...
AFBCMR 02-00164 INDEX NUMBER: 121.03 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in...
However, a review of his medical records showed he was seen in the Dispensary in Taiwan during the time frame the he alleges to have been in Vietnam. His being in the dispensary on 11 April 1968 has nothing to do with the date of the TDY order. The evidence in the applicant's records does not support his request to have his records corrected to reflect time served in Vietnam.
Applicant’s grade at time of discharge was airman (Amn/E-2). The pertinent facts surrounding his discharge are contained in the Air Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) Hearing Record at Exhibit C. ___________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPRS reviewed this application and addressed the reason for the discharge. Exhibit C. AFDRB Hearing Record, dated 12 Nov 98.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00167 INDEX CODE 100.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His name be changed on his DD Form 214 from J--- W--- to J--- W---. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate...
LAWRENCE R. LEEHY Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, AFPC/DPPAE, dtd Mar 4, 2002, w/Atch AFBCMR 02-00172 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00180 INDEX CODE: 111.01, 126.03, 131.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Officer Performance Reports (OPRs), with closeout dates of 1 May 97 and 1 May 98, be removed from his records; and, he receive consideration for direct promotion to colonel by the CY98C (P0698C) central colonel...
On 16 November 1999, the commander notified the applicant that she was being discharged for a condition that interfered with military service, specifically for mental disorders. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant states that the records document entry level separation for unsuiting maladjustment to military training. A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit D. AFPC/DPPAE states that the...
INDEX CODE 121.03 AFBCMR 02-00183 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief...
INDEX CODE: 110.02, 100.03 AFBCMR 02-00184 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00185 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM). Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the...
The Medical Consultant states that his records indicate that he had a pattern of recurring misconduct which interfered with his military duties and resulted in his discharge. The DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 12 Apr 02 for review and comment within 30 days. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 12 Apr 02.
The RE code of 2C, “Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service” is correct. After reviewing the applicant’s submission and the evidence of record, we are persuaded that some relief is warranted. ROSCOE HINTON, JR. Panel Chair AFBCMR 02-00188 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of...
Applicant did not complete a new SGLV 8286 declining coverage until 30 November 2001. A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant states that it is noted that notification of the SGLI reenactment was posted in their base newspaper. He further states that if the period of 1 April–30 November 2001 is disapproved for reimbursement he request that the Board...
Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief of Staff signed by the Executive Director or his designee. Members of the Board Mr. David C. Van Gasbeck, Mr. Roscoe Hinton Jr., and Ms. Patricia D. Vestal considered this application on 23 April 2002. DAVID C. VAN GASBECK Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, HQ AFPC/DPSFM, dtd 8 Apr 02, with attachment AFBCMR 02-00195 INDEX CODE:...
He recommended that applicant be discharged from the service. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant indicated that he is now retired and a member of the American Legion. Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 15 Mar 02, w/atchs.
On 18 Jan 51, while serving in the grade of private first class, the applicant received an undesirable discharge, under the provisions of AFR 39-22 (conviction by civil authority). DPPRS indicated that the Air Force does not provide legal counsel in civil matters. The HQ AFPC/DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reviewed the Air Force evaluation and indicated that...
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The reasons the applicant believes the records to be in error or unjust and the evidence submitted in support of his appeal are at Exhibit A. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant’s submission, we are not persuaded that his discharge should be upgraded to honorable. We conclude, therefore, that the discharge proceedings were proper and characterization of the discharge was...
He was accepted in the Air Force (AF) Officer Training School (OTS) where he attended for three months and was commissioned. As of this date, no response has been received by this office. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or an injustice.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00207 INDEX CODE: 110.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: a. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was not notified nor briefed that he was eligible to receive 20 days of permissive temporary duty (PDTY) that he was entitled to, in...
The applicant was discharged on 14 Apr 70. We find no evidence of error in this case and after thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record, we do not believe he has suffered from an injustice. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00212 INDEX CODE: 108.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect that he was diagnosed with the hepatitis C virus. The hepatitis C virus was not known to medical science at the time the applicant states he had hepatitis and could not have been diagnosed as such. ...
INDEX CODE 100.00 AFBCMR 02-00213 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00217 INDEX CODE 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her bad conduct discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. The applicant submitted a DD Form 149 dated 31 January 2002, but did not request a specific correction of error or injustice or provided a reason. AFLS/JAJM evaluation is...
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPPR states the applicant has not submitted any documentation to substantiate that he was an aircrew member or that he flew in any combat mission or had any direct involvement with any mission in support of Vietnam. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice for award of the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal. The applicant has not...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00223 INDEX CODE: 100.06 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment code of “3D” be changed. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate...
After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record, the Board majority is unpersuaded that relief should be granted. The applicant did not provide any evidence as to why the report is not an accurate reflection of his performance. _________________________________________________________________ RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD: A majority of the panel finds insufficient evidence of error or injustice and recommends the application be denied.
INDEX CODE 137.04 AFBCMR 02-00230 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Staff and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00231 INDEX CODE: 100.03, 100.06 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: a. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant reviewed applicant's request and states that he was separated from the Air Force based on a diagnosis of...
INDEX CODE 112.07 AFBCMR 02-00234 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00236 INDEX CODE: 112.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS states that they believe the discharge was consistent with the procedural and...
On 23 March 1955, applicant was notified of his commander's intent to initiate discharge action against him for the following reasons: On 1 October 1952, the applicant received a summary court-martial for failure to repair and was demoted to airman basic, received 45 days’ restriction and was fined $50. On 22 June 1955, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered and denied applicant’s request for an upgrade of his undesirable discharge to an honorable discharge. On 19 March...
He received an RE Code of 2C, which defined means "Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service.” The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force at Exhibits C, D and E. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The AFBCMR Medical...
He served 6 months and 9 days total active duty service with 11 days lost time. Additionally, he provided no facts warranting an upgrade of his discharge. As of this date, no response has been received by this office.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit B). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit C). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00241 INDEX CODE 100.06 COUNSEL: American Legion HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed from 2B to 3A so that he may pursue a career in the U. S. Army. The evidence of records supports the stated reasons for the applicant's ineligibility to reenlist and we are...
AFBCMR 02-00245 INDEX CODE: 111.01 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief...
INDEX CODE 100.00 AFBCMR 02-00247 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief...
LAWRENCE R. LEEHY Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, AFPC/DPPTR, dtd 12 Mar 02 AFBCMR 02-00249 INDEX CODE: 137.00 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, SSN, be corrected to show that: a. On March 31,...
Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief of Staff signed by the Executive Director or his designee. Members of the Board Mr. Roger E. Willmeth, Mr. Clarence D. Long III, and Ms. Martha Maust considered this application on 18 April 2002. ROGER E. WILLMETH Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, HQ ARPC/DPP, dtd 19 Mar 02, with attachment AFBCMR 02-00252 INDEX CODE: 137.04 MEMORANDUM FOR...
For a decoration to be credited for the 00E7 cycle, the closeout date must be on or before the promotion eligibility cutoff date (PECD) of 31 Dec 99 and must have been placed into official channels prior to the promotion selection date of 31 May 00. The complete evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit D. _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant responded to the Air Force evaluations by indicating that he...
A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPRS determined that based on the documentation in the applicant’s file, his discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation. The complete evaluation is at Exhibit E. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluation were forwarded to the applicant on 28 Jun 02 for review and comment...
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant's military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force (Exhibit C). We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force and adopt their rationale as the basis for our...
AFBCMR 02-00436 Index Number: 112.00 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum...