AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-01551
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01551 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) Code of 2C be changed to make him eligible to enlist in the Armed Forces. The AFPC/DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPAE states that the RE Code of 2C (involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-01560
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01560 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) Code of 2X be removed from Item 27, Reenlistment Code, of his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, issued on 10 August 1985. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-01616
The applicant did not file an appeal under the provisions of AFI 36-2401, Correcting Officer and Enlisted Evaluation System, 1 Dec 97. However, a report is not erroneous or unfair because the applicant believes it contributed to a nonselection for promotion or may impact future promotion or career opportunities. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number 02-01616 in Executive Session on 20 November 2002,...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-01622
All LEAD officers display the current PAS of assignment (which is active duty), the file from which the data is obtained (“BA” meaning active duty officer), an identifier showing “AGR” (also indicating full-time active duty), and 239 active duty training points in the current retirement/retention (R/R) year (“PT SINCE: 13 Feb 01” at the bottom of the OSB). In addition, after reviewing the applicant’s OPRs, we noted that the assignment history section of the contested OSB contains...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-01630
He was found guilty of all charges and specifications and was sentenced to be discharged with a bad conduct discharge, confinement for ten months, forfeiture of $466.00 pay per month for ten months, and reduction to the grade of airman basic. The Air Force Court of Military Review affirmed the findings and sentence of the military judge. The applicant’s case file contains an undated and unsigned DD Form 293, Application for the Review of Discharge or Dismissal from the Armed Forces of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-01634
The DPPPR evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 13 Sep 02 for review and comment within 30 days. While the applicant could not provide a copy of the order awarding him the AFCM (1OLC) for the period in question, we are persuaded by the evidence provided by the applicant that the award was processed and...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-01635
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: On his Report of Medical History, dated 15 Nov 00, the applicant indicated he did not have asthma, was not on any medications, and had no known allergies. The case was found legally sufficient and the discharge authority directed the applicant’s entry-level separation for fraudulent entry into military service. Exhibit C. Letter, AFBCMR Medical Consultant, dated 9 Aug 02.
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-01639
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01639 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His discharge be corrected to show that he was a technical sergeant and not a staff sergeant. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPWB recommended the applicant's request be time barred. After a...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-01643
He reenlisted with an SRB of 2 and while deployed the SRB changed to 3. He was honorably discharged on 17 January 2002 and reenlisted in the Regular Air Force for a period of four (4) years and five (5) months on 18 January 2002; and, at the time of his reenlistment of 18 January 2002, he was entitled to a Zone A, Multiple three (3) Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). He was honorably discharged on 17 January 2002 and reenlisted in the Regular Air Force on 18 January 2002, for a period...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-01652
The member remained eligible to make the election at age 60. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant’s Congressman statement, dated 31 Jul 02.
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-01665
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01665 INDEX CODE: 131.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Promotion Recommendation Form (PRF) prepared for the CY01A Major Board be revised to reflect his record of performance and that he be considered for promotion to the grade of major by a Special Selection Board (SSB) for the Calendar...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-01683
In support of the applicant's appeal, he submits a copy of the contested EPR, AF Form 948, Application For Correction/Removal of Evaluation Reports, a statement from his rater, and the ERAB report. It would be necessary for the applicant to provide a corrected EPR with his application to the ERAB. The AFPC/DPPPWB evaluation is attached at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reviewed the...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-01684
DPPPEP evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant responded that he did not appeal his OERs since he never intended to return to active duty. The applicant’s letter is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. We also note that this appeal is filed twenty-one years after the closeout date of the last report.
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-01702
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 9 February 1948, for a period of three years. However, without the applicant’s military pay records, we are unable to determine his eligibility for MOP at the time of his 1954 discharge. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2002-01702 in Executive Session on 19...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-01708
On 28 Aug 01, the convening authority approved only so much of the sentence as provided for the reduction and forfeitures. JAJM stated that the applicant was an NCO with almost 20 years of service at the time he provided a urine sample that tested positive for the presence of a metabolite of marijuana. There are no other provisions of law that would allow for advancement of enlisted members.
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-01731
AFPC/DPAOY indicated that following a thorough review of the applicant’s request, the findings and recommendations of the office of the Air Force Inspector General, Air Force Rated Force Policy, and the Inspector General of the Department of Defense, they find no further information to support this request. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-01749
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01749 INDEX CODE: 112.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His separation and reenlistment eligibility (RE) codes be changed. A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-01764
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01764 INDEX CODE:135.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His personnel record reflect satisfactory participation in the Air Force Reserve. AFRC/DPM evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFRC/DPT recommends the application be denied. _________________________________________________________________ The...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-01768
At the time she was released, she took her end of course exams twice and failed both times due to working 12 hour days and suffering a miscarriage. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case, however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-01769
He completed 2 years, 11 months, and 28 days of active service. After thoroughly reviewing the available evidence of record and noting the applicant’s complete submission, we find no evidence of error or injustice. We also find insufficient evidence to warrant a recommendation that the discharge be upgraded on the basis of clemency.
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-01782
The AFPC/DPPAEQ evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant states he requested a DD Form 215 with the correct discharge date from the Marine Corps; however, his request was refused. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-01791
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01791 INDEX NUMBER: 131.00 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXX-XX-XXXX HEARING DESIRED: No _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His assignment history as indicated on the Officer Selection Brief (OSB) viewed by the CY01 Lieutenant Colonel Central Selection Board be corrected to reflect a duty title of “Strategic Airlift...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-01793
The patrolman reported that the applicant stated that he was not going to be handcuffed and he grabbed the patrolman’s arm. He also stated that the witnesses’ statement was not true. He contends that out of three alcohol incidents under the same commander, only the African Americans were punished.
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-01804
The applicant states that after receiving notification of his reassignment to the ISLRS on 2 November 2000, he received no further notices, orders, or letters. The applicant was transferred to the ISLRS on 16 May 2002, and his SGLI coverage was automatically terminated. After reviewing the evidence of record, we believe that had the applicant been properly informed he would have taken the necessary action to be transferred to the ISLRS on 2 November 2000.
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-01805
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant's military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force. Therefore, Andrews AFB Flight Management Office (FMO) was correct to medically disqualify applicant upon receipt of his Flight Record Folder (FRF) effective 11 May 2001, 365 days from the 11 May 2000 Duty Not to Include Flying (DNIF) date. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-01817
Applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinions and recommendations of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. We are not persuaded by the evidence submitted that he was not provided full and fair consideration by the ISS Central...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-01857
When the applicant enlisted in the Air Force on 12 January 1950, he completed the NME Form 4, Enlistment Record – United States Air Force. The Board is persuaded that the applicant has provided sufficient documentation to warrant a change to his DD Form 214. In view of the above the Board recommends that his record be corrected to the extent indicated below _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-01878
In support of his request, applicant submits a copy of AF Form 948, Application for Correction/Removal of Evaluation Reports; the Evaluation Reports Appeal Board (ERAB) decision; a professional endorsement by his commander subsequent to the contested events (the additional rater of his OPR closing 20 June 2000); copies of his OPRs covering the period 15 February 1997 through 19 March 2001; a letter of appreciation and AF Form 1058, Unfavorable Information File Action. While laudatory of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-01892
Based on the approved findings of the Army Retiring Board that the applicant was permanently incapacitated for military service, that such incapacity was the caused by and the result of an incident of service, and that his disability was combat incurred or the result of an explosion of an instrumentality of war in the line of duty, the applicant was released from active duty in the grade of first lieutenant on 7 September 1947. They also state there is no documentation to show the applicant...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-01902
As of this date, no response has been received by this office. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant’s submission, we are not persuaded that his discharge separation and reenlistment code should be changed. We therefore agree with the recommendations of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has failed to sustain his burden that he has suffered either an error or an injustice.
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-01904
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPEP states that the applicant’s request is vague because he does not specify exactly which report he is contesting. A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPPWB states that due to the applicant’s new date of rank to A1C of 9 January 1995, he was promoted to Senior Airman (SrA) on 5 September 1996 (20 months time-in-grade). We took notice of the applicant's complete...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-01908
Effective 1 April 2001, Public Law 106-419, automatically increased the level of SGLI coverage to $250,000 for all military members, until the members could elect reduced coverage or no coverage, regardless of any prior election. The AFPC/DPW evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant states, in part, that Kirtland AFB leadership did not advise that if you had...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-01934
On 10 August 1982, he received a Letter of Reprimand for failure to report for duty at the prescribed time, 0800 hours on 9 August 1982, after a two-day leave he had taken. Therefore, he did not recommend further rehabilitation because of negative response to Letters of Reprimand and Counseling. OLGA M. CRERAR Panel Chair AFBCMR 02-01934 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-01941
He included the citation and orders awarding him the MSM, 3OLC. For purposes of including this decoration in a board that convened on 5 November 2001, the decoration did not yet exist. Nevertheless, we are not sufficiently persuaded that the absence of the contested award was the sole cause of the applicant’s non-selection for promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel, nor has the applicant provided sufficient evidence that he would have been promoted had this award been in his...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-01944
In support of his request, applicant provided his MSM citation and special order GB-18. DPPPO states that although the period of award for the decoration was through 17 Jul 01, the orders for the decoration were not published until 9 Nov 01. Thus, it is our opinion that the MSM was not a matter of record at the time the selection board convened and accordingly, it was not required to be included in his selection record.
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-01956
Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MIBR, dated 20 Sep 02.
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-01960
Current Air Force promotion policy (AFI 36-2502, Table 2.2, Rule 5, Note 2) dictates that before a decoration is credited for a specific promotion cycle, the close out date of the decoration must be on or before the promotion eligibility cutoff date (PECD), and the date of the DECOR-6, must be before the date of selections for the cycle in question. No evidence was presented which showed to the Board majority’s satisfaction that the decoration was placed in official channels prior to the...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-01963
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01963 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect award of the Purple Heart Medal. Applicant’s available records further reflect that he was awarded the Korean Service Medal, the United Nations Service Medal, and the National Defense Service Medal. A complete copy of...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-01964
Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief of Staff signed by the Executive Director or his designee. Members of the Board Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Ms. Martha J. Evans, and Ms. Diane Arnold considered this application on 19 December 2002. THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ Vice Chair Attachment: Ltr, HQ AFPC/DPAPP2, dtd 14 Nov 02, with attachment AFBCMR 02-01964 INDEX CODE:...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-01992
Although the citation was not present in his OSR for the board’s review, the selection board had his entire officer selection record at their disposal, including the OSB reflecting the DMSM 1OLC, during promotion consideration. Because a very significant citation was missing, the selection board did not have his entire OSR. We also note that the central boards evaluate the entire officer record and it is highly unlikely the missing DMSM, 1OLC citation from applicant's Officer Selection...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-01993
The applicant contends that the 1 Mar 01 closeout date was an administrative error and that the correct closeout date should have been 1 Apr 00. Had the medal been considered, he would have been selected for promotion. The applicant requested supplemental promotion consideration and his request was denied because resubmission of the AFCM was initiated after the date selections were made for the 01E6 cycle, 31 May 2001.
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-02023
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-02023 INDEX CODE: 110.03, 100.06 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed so that he may enlist in the Air Force Reserves. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPAE, dated 8 Oct 02. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 11 Oct 02.
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-02025
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-02025 INDEX NUMBER: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXX-XX-XXXX HEARING DESIRED: No _____________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Purple Heart for injuries he sustained on 29 June 1952. The applicant’s DD Form 214, item 29, “wounds received as a result of action with enemy forces” reflects a hand injury caused by explosion...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-02031
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-02031 INDEX CODE: 110.00 APPLICANT COUNSEL: Steuben County Veteran's Service Agency SSN HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her entry-level separation be changed to an honorable discharge and the reason for discharge be changed to "Involuntary Separation." After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record, we...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-02041
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-02041 INDEX NUMBER: 131.00 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXX-XX-XXXX HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Officer Selection Record (OSR) be corrected to include a copy of the Meritorious Service Medal (MSM) Third Oak Leaf Cluster (3OLC) he was awarded for the period 13 May 96 to 15 Jul 00 and his...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-02044
The following is a resume of the applicant's recent EPR profile: PERIOD ENDING PROMOTION RECOMMENDATION 7 Jun 99 4 7 Jun 01 4 3 Jun 02 3 _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFRC/DPM reviewed applicant's request and recommends denial. Evidence has not been presented which would lead us to believe that his commander abused his discretionary authority or that his decision not to recommend the applicant for promotion was based on...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-02055
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-02055 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Air Force Overseas Long and Short Tour Ribbons (AFOLTR, AFOSTR) and Air Force Training Ribbon (AFTR). Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-02057
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Because the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) upgraded his discharge from “Under Honorable Conditions (General)” to “Honorable,” his reentry code and narrative reason for separation should be changed to allow him to re-enter active military service. The DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPAE reviewed the applicant’s case and concludes that the RE code of 2C is correct. The DPPAE...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-02059
The former member's request for upgrade of his discharge from under other than honorable to honorable was considered by the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) on 26 Jul 82. DPPRS indicated that, at the time the Air Force Review Board upgraded the former member's discharge to general, they stated that "further upgrade of the discharge was not appropriate because his records reflect extensive, though minor, acts of misconduct. We note that the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB)...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-02063
The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Pursuant to the Board’s request, HQ AFPC/DPPRS provided the following advisory opinion concerning the recent DoD rules and the type of discharge a member would receive today. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating...