Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-01782
Original file (BC-2002-01782.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:                       DOCKET NUMBER:  02-01782
                                       INDEX CODE:  102.05
      XXXXXXXXXXXXXX                    COUNSEL: NONE

      XXXXXXXXXXX                            HEARING DESIRED:  NO

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His date entered active duty (EAD) in the  Air  Force  be  changed  from  11
January 2001 to 13 January 2001 and he be paid pay and allowances for  13-14
January 2001.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He was discharged from the United States Marine Corps  (USMC)  to  accept  a
Regular Air Force (RegAF) commission in the United States Air Force  (USAF).
 He was selected for officer training school (OTS) to report on  16  January
2001.  Because he elected to drive to Maxwell AFB from  his  home  in  North
Carolina, he was entitled to two days POV travel.  Reporting on  16  January
2001 and traveling two days from North Carolina put  his  earliest  swear-in
date as Sunday, 14 January 2001. Since the  Military  Enlistment  Processing
Station (MEPS) was not open on the weekend and was also  closed  Friday,  12
January 2001 due to the observance of Martin Luther King Holiday,  he  swore
in on 11 January 2001.

It was already too late to have the Marine Corps approve a  request  for  an
earlier discharge, so he swore-in early not realizing that  it  could  later
cause him a problem.  His discharge from the Marine  Corps  was  12  January
2001.

In support of  his  application,  he  provides  a  personal  statement,  his
enlistment and  discharge  documentation  from  the  Marine  Corps  and  his
enlistment documentation  for  the  Air  Force.   The  applicant’s  complete
submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 11 April 1988, the applicant enlisted in the Regular USMC at the  age  of
20  in  the  grade  of  private  for  a  period  of  four  years.   He   was
progressively promoted  to  the  rank  of  staff  sergeant  (E-6).   He  was
honorably discharged from the USMC, effective 12 January 2001  to  accept  a
commission in another branch of the service.

On 11 January 2001, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force  in  the
grade of technical sergeant (E-6) and was voluntarily  ordered  to  extended
active duty (EAD) on that same date for a  period  of  120  days  to  attend
Officer Training School (OTS) with a reporting date of 16 January 2001.   On
4 April 2001, the applicant was discharged from enlisted status  and,  on  5
April 2001, he was appointed a second lieutenant, Reserve of the Air  Force,
and was voluntarily ordered to EAD on that same date.

Examiner’s  Note:   The  Defense  Finance  and  Accounting  Service   (DFAS)
confirmed the applicant  was  picked-up  for  pay  purposes  with  the  USAF
effective 15 January 2001.  The Marine Corps paid the applicant through  his
discharge date, 12 January 2001.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPPAEQ conducted a review of the applicant’s case file  and  recommends
the applicant’s request be denied.  The applicant  signed  his  Regular  Air
Force enlistment contract and took the oath of office on  11  January  2001.
The date of separation (DOS) with the USMC was administratively  established
to support his Regular Air Force commission.  An  administrative  change  to
the USMC’s DD Form 214 is  a  practice  not  uncommon  between  branches  of
service during interservice transfers.  The  AFPC/DPPAEQ  evaluation  is  at
Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

The applicant states he requested a DD Form 215 with the correct discharge
date from the Marine Corps; however, his request was refused.  Because his
DD Form 214, discharge certificate, plaques, mementos and  photos  reflect
his discharge on 12 January 2001, he respectfully  requests  consideration
of his request for sentimental reasons as well as the ease of working with
his current military branch.  He again requests back pay and  entitlements
for 13-14 January 2001.  The applicant’s rebuttal with attachments  is  at
Exhibit E.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing  law  or
regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Sufficient relevant evidence  has  been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence  of  error  or  injustice  warranting  corrective  action.   After
reviewing the applicant’s submission,  we  believe  that  an  injustice  has
occurred in the establishment of his date that he entered active duty.   The
applicant was discharged from the Marine Corps  on  12  January  2001.   The
recruiter at the MEPS convinced the applicant to take the Air Force Oath  of
Office on 11 January 2001 because the MEPS would  be  closed  12-15  January
2001 in  observance  of  the  Martin  Luther  King  Holiday.   We  feel  the
recruiter misguided the applicant  by  not  telling  him  of  the  potential
consequences of taking the Oath of Enlistment early.  If the  applicant  had
been advised early enough, he may have been able to  adjust  his  separation
date from the Marine Corps to accommodate the closing of the  MEPS  and  his
OTS reporting date of 16 January 2001.  In order to  rectify  any  potential
injustice, we believe any doubt in this matter should  be  resolved  in  the
applicant’s favor and conclude that the  date  he  entered  active  duty  be
changed to 13 January 2001.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air  Force  relating
to APPLICANT be corrected to show that he enlisted in the Regular Air  Force
in the grade of Technical  Sergeant  on  13 January  2001,  rather  than  11
January 2001; and that his date of entry on active duty in the  Regular  Air
Force is 13 January 2001, rather than 15 January 2001.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered this application in  Executive
Session on 6 February 2002, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

      Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Vice Chair
      Mr. Mike Novel, Member
      Ms. Rita S. Looney, Member


The following documentary evidence for AFBCMR  Docket  Number  02-01782  was
considered:

     Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 8 May 02, w/atchs.
     Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
     Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPPAEQ, dated 3 Oct 02.
     Exhibit E.  Applicant’s Rebuttal, dated 2 Jan 03




                                  THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
                                  Vice Chair

AFBCMR 02-01782




MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF

      Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of
Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed
that:

      The pertinent military records of the  Department  of  the  Air  Force
relating to XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, be corrected to show that  he  enlisted  in
the Regular Air Force in the grade  of  Technical  Sergeant  on  13  January
2001, rather than 11 January 2001; and that his  date  of  entry  on  active
duty in the Regular Air Force is 13 January 2001,  rather  than  15  January
2001.





  JOE G. LINEBERGER

  Director

  Air Force Review Boards Agency

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01694

    Original file (BC-2011-01694.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Six of his classmates that graduated from other locations had their DORs as 31 December 2009 and were recently on the captain selection board. ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant was appointed into the Air Force Reserves on 31 December 2009 and entered into extended active duty (EAD) on 5 January 2010. He received 50 percent credit from 31 December 2009 to 4 January 2010 for a total of 2 days which established his date of rank...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00654

    Original file (BC 2014 00654.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandums prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibits C and D. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAN defers to AFPC Service Dates Verification Office to address/validate the applicant’s first lieutenant DOR, but does provide information pertaining the applicant’s appointment in the grade of first lieutenant. In accordance with AFI 36-2008, she received 50...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01683

    Original file (BC-2003-01683.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    AFI 36-2604 states, “Former AFROTC cadets ordered to EAD under Title 10, USC., 2105 and 2107, keep the date of rank specified on their reserve enlistment contract.” It implies that former AFROTC cadets did not have a previous DOR. Eighteen or nineteen year old cadet disenrolled from AFROTC have to give back time or money to the Air Force and have to be involuntarily recalled to active duty. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00179

    Original file (BC-2004-00179.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. On 28 February 2002, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force (RegAF) in the grade of Airman First Class (E-3). At the time of enlistment, the applicant both initialed and signed an AF Form 3006, Enlistment Agreement - Prior Service, stating, “I am enlisting in pay grade E-3.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-00008

    Original file (BC-2002-00008.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was assured by his recruiter, prior to his enlistment, that given his prior service and rank, it should not be a problem for him to be able to enlist in the Air Force as an E-4. When he enlisted he noticed that the contract listed his enlistment grade as E-2. To enlist in a grade previously held in a branch of service other than the Regular Air Force, individuals must meet specific Total Active Military Service (TAFMS) requirements that are equitable within the Air Force promotion system.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2001-02978

    Original file (BC-2001-02978.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A complete copy of the Record of Proceedings, with attachments, is at Exhibit F. On 8 August 2003, Counsel submitted applicant’s request for reconsideration, contending that he enlisted into the Marine Corps on 29 May 1968, establishing DIEUS and TAFMSD. The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit G. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPAOR states that the applicant still is not providing a copy of the enlistment contract. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01782

    Original file (BC 2013 01782.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    (Exhibit C) ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial. The AFI does not require the commander’s approval for early testing while on the 42-day acclimatization period from deployment. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 6 Dec 13.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-02370

    Original file (BC-2002-02370.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DPPAEQ evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant states that AFI 36-2604 states that if a member was serving in a regular component other than the Regular Air Force and enlists in a lower grade due to Total Active Federal Military Service (TAFMS), the DOR will be computed from the original DOR for the enlistment grade and years separated from the Date of Separation (DOS). In further...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0032

    Original file (FD2002-0032.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE | py9992-0032 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable and for a change in the Reason and Authority for the discharge. Despite the gravity of the misconduct, given the sincerity of the applicant’s motivation for seeking an upgrade, the applicant’s post-service accomplishments, and the circumstances of the case, the DRB concluded that the characterization of the applicant’s service was too harsh. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03963

    Original file (BC-2002-03963.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-03963 INDEX NUMBER: 135.00 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXX-XX-XXXX HEARING DESIRED: Yes _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The grade of staff sergeant (SSgt) (E-5) with a date of rank (DOR) of 13 Nov 00 that he earned in the Air National Guard be established as the grade in which he was ordered to active duty. ...