INDEX CODE: 112.05, 112.03 AFBCMR 02-02785 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set...
INDEX CODE: 112.05, 112.03 AFBCMR 02-02790 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set...
INDEX CODE 100.03 AFBCMR 02-02792 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Staff and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief...
INDEX CODE: 102.05, 131.09 AFBCMR 02-02816 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set...
Members of the Board Mr. Joseph G. Diamond, Ms. Kathleen F. Graham, and Mr. Joseph A. Roj considered this application on 5 Nov 02. JOSEPH G. DIAMOND Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, ARPC/SG, dated 19 Sep 02, w/atchs. AFBCMR 02-02827 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of...
AFBCMR 02-02829 INDEX NUMBER: 112.00 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in...
INDEX CODE: 131.09 AFBCMR 02-02839 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in...
INDEX CODE: 112.05, 112.03 AFBCMR 02-02849 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set...
Members of the Board Mr. Albert F. Lowas, Jr., Mr. William H. Anderson, and Mr. Thomas J. Topolski, Jr., considered this application on 16 October 2002. ALBERT F. LOWAS, JR. Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, AFPC/DPPAE, dtd 23 Sep 02. AFBCMR 02-02864 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board...
AFBCMR 02-02899 INDEX CODE: 128.02 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief...
AFBCMR 02-02906 INDEX NUMBER: 112.00 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: XXXXXXXXXXX, XXX-XX-XXXX Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Members of the Board, Mr. Jackson A. Hauslein, Ms. Dorothy P. Loeb, and Ms. Rita S. Looney,...
AFBCMR 02-02909 INDEX CODE: 128.05 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief...
INDEX CODE: 128.05 AFBCMR 02-02958 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
Members of the Board, Messrs. Roscoe Hinton, Jr., James W. Russell, III, and James E. Short, considered this application on 23 October 2002. ROSCOE HINTON, JR. Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, AFPC/DPPAE, dtd 7 Oct 02 w/atchs AFBCMR 02-02963 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board...
AFBCMR 02-02965 INDEX CODE: 112.00 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief...
INDEX CODE: 102.05, 131.09 AFBCMR 02-02989 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set...
INDEX CODE 131.01 AFBCMR 02-03003 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Staff and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief...
Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief of Staff signed by the Executive Director of the Board or his designee. Members of the Board Ms. Peggy E. Gordon, Mr. Christopher Carey, Mr. Billy C. Baxter, considered this application on October 29, 2002. PEGGY E. GORDON Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, AFPC/DPPAE, dtd 15 Oct 02 AFBCMR 02-03027 INDEX CODE: 112.07 MEMORANDUM FOR THE...
INDEX CODE: 121.03 AFBCMR 02-03031 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
INDEX CODE: 102.05, 131.09 AFBCMR 02-03032 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set...
INDEX CODE 100.03 AFBCMR 02-03106 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief...
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPO recommends the applicant’s EAD requirement be waived to the normal six months and he be allowed to meet the CY02B...
AFBCMR 02-03173 INDEX CODE: 128.00 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth...
INDEX CODE: 112.05, 112.03 AFBCMR 02-03177 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set...
Members of the Board Mr. Albert F. Lowas, Jr., Mr. James E. Short and Mr. Laurence M. Groner considered this application on 21 November 2002. ALBERT F. LOWAS, JR. Panel Chair Attachments: 1. Email, Applicant, dtd 20 Nov 02 AFBCMR 02-03218 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for...
INDEX CODE: 112.05, 112.03 AFBCMR 02-03232 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set...
AFBCMR 02-03262 INDEX CODE: 137.02 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-03316 INDEX CODE 131.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He receive a waiver of the 12-month Extended Active Duty (EAD) requirement to meet the Calendar Year 2002B Central Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF...
INDEX CODE 135.02 AFBCMR 02-03369 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Staff and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief...
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 24 May 1999, the Board reconsidered and denied applicant’s request that his discharge be declared void and that he receive retroactive pay, points and sufficient years of service to qualify for a reserve retirement. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant’s counsel states that the applicant did not confuse...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC 2002 01403
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-01403 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His award of the Silver Star (SS) be upgraded to the Medal of Honor (MoH) for his actions on 26 Nov 43. According to documentation provided by the applicant, on 11 Jan 44, he was wounded in action. A review of the applicants records revealed that he should have been awarded the Prisoner of War Medal (PWM),...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC 2002 01953 3
For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicants appeal and the rationale of the earlier decisions by the Board, see Exhibit E and G, respectively. Exhibit G. Addendum to Record of Proceedings, dated 24 November 2009, w/atchs. Exhibit H. Letter, Applicant, dated 18 March 2013, w/atchs.
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC 2002 02804
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He needs his DD Form 214, dated 10 April 1975, corrected to show he served in Vietnam in 1971. The Vietnam Service Medal was awarded to members of the Armed Forces of the United States who served at any time between 4 July 1965, and 28 March 1973, in Vietnam or its contiguous waters or airspace, or, for any period of service during the same time period in Thailand, Laos, or Cambodia or the air spaces...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC 2002 03160 2
; and, - If so, at the time of the applicant's affirmative claim to sanctuary protection, was the applicant then on active duty (other than for training); that is, was the applicant then performing ADS duties, or had she previously been released from active duty? It follows that the Bond decision has no application to this request because the Bond case did not concern itself with the key issue that's present in this request: "Did this applicant make an affirmative sanctuary zone claim...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-1973-03381A
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 73-3381 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: In the applicant’s request for reconsideration, he requests that his undesirable discharge be upgraded to honorable. Exhibit G. DD Form 293, dated 21 August 2002, w/atchs. ALBERT F. LOWAS JR Panel Chair AFBCMR...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-1986-04015FORMAL
Similarly, the applicant has recast his previously rejected argument regarding his "miscounseling" by former HPAC Chairmen, Colonel C and Lt Col W. In support, the applicant asserts that five 1983 U.S. Air Force Academy (USAFA) graduates who subsequently graduated from the USUHS 1987 Class were granted relief by the AFBCMR based on the erroneous counseling by Colonel C and Lt Col W. As it regards Colonel C, the Board has previously concluded that there was "no showing of misinformation by...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-1990-00604A
He be considered for promotion to the grade of major by a Special Selection Board (SSB) and returned to active duty. However, his OER closing 6 May 1987 needs to be removed from his record and that this period be considered “non-rated time.” In addition, he requests a Special Selection Board be held to evaluate him. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-1993-01309A
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 93-01309 INDEX CODE: 112.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: In the applicant’s request for reconsideration, he requests that his Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be changed. Because this episode occurred shortly before the expiration of his term of enlistment, he did not have...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-1994-03030C
He be promoted to the grade of major as of the date he was restored to active duty in 1994; and, that he be promoted to the grade lieutenant colonel with the date of rank and effective date of promotion he would have had had he been selected with his contemporaries. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/JA recommended that the Board determine that the failure of the applicant to be given an opportunity to be promoted to major with...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-1998-01783A
A complete copy of the Record of Proceedings is attached at Exhibit E. The applicant submitted an application dated 21 April 2002, again requesting that his general under honorable conditions discharge be upgraded to honorable. In support of his request, he provided a copy of his NGB 22, Departments of the Army and the Air Force National Guard Bureau Report of Separation and Record of Service, and a copy of his Air National Guard Enlistment/Reenlistment Document. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-1999-03003A
In the absence of clear-cut evidence that the applicant should have been selected for promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel by the SSB, we do not recommend approval of his request for direct promotion. Therefore, we recommend that the applicant’s records be corrected as indicated below. ____________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2000-00012B
His complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit S. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Pursuant to the Board’s request, the BCMR Medical Consultant reviewed applicant's request and recommends denial. After again reviewing this application and the evidence provided in support of the appeal, we remain unpersuaded that the applicant's condition qualified him for DES consideration. In his most recent submission, the applicant asserts...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2000-00023A
The Board denied the applicant’s request for a new SSB for the CY96B promotion board (Exhibit K). They indicate that to a certain extent, the applicant is correct when he points out that when Congress amended 10 USC 612 it required that each selection board member be on the ADL retroactive to 1981. AF/JAG opines that the amendment to section 612 applies only to SSBs convened after October 2000 because the amendment specifically refers to any selection board convened under section 611(a)...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2001-00787
Because she was an outstanding officer up to the time of her improper removal from command, she should be promoted to lieutenant colonel. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPR reviewed this application and recommends denial. She has not submitted any evidence to support her claim and there is no evidence that he relied on rumors as a basis for admonishing her or relieving her from command.
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2001-00970
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-00970 INDEX CODE: 111.01, 131.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He receive Special Selection Board (SSB) consideration by the CY99A (19 April 1999) (P0599A) central lieutenant colonel selection board with an amended Promotion Recommendation Form (PRF) which accurately reflects...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2001-01098A
On 5 March 2001, the applicant’s commander notified him of his intent to recommend him for discharge from the Air Force for Entry Level Performance and Conduct. The Air Force Board of Correction for Military Records (AFBCMR) considered and denied the applicant’s request to have his RE code and uncharacterized discharge upgraded on 25 July 2001. JOSEPH G. DIAMOND Panel Chair AFBCMR BC-2001-01098 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having reviewed and considered the recommendation of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2001-01181B
_______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Counsel for the applicant responds to the Air Force advisories in a letter with six attachments which includes two letters of support, Evidence and Exhibits, Facts, Findings, & Relief Requests, a complete and expanded rebuttal and an Executive Summary. The Advisory states: We recommend the AFBCMR deny the applicant’s request for direct promotion, to reconvene the MLR is moot, and...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2001-01442A
On 5 Sep 02, the applicant submitted a copy of a DD Form 293, dated 17 May 01, with the same request as above (Exhibit G). The applicant submitted a new DD Form 149 on 26 Oct 02 requesting that he be allowed to reenlist in the Air Force (Exhibit I). Exhibit J.
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2001-02189
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: At the recommendation of her physician, a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) reviewed the applicant's medical history and recommended that her case be forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) for disability consideration. The Record of Proceedings, with attachments, is at Exhibit H. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPD states that pursuant...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2001-02316
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSAMP recommended denial of the applicant’s request for a name change. If the court order was dated on or before the applicant’s discharge date, a correction would be possible. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that...