RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-03022 INDEX NUMBER: 112.00 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXX-XX-XXXX HEARING DESIRED: No _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment (RE) code of “2C” (Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service) be upgraded to a code in the three (3) series to allow...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-03028 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His date of rank (DOR) to SSgt (E-5) be corrected from 29 Feb 00 to 2 Nov 97, his DOR when he served in the Air National Guard (ANG); his extended active duty (EAD) date reflect 2 Mar 99 vice 29 Feb 00, and his Weighted Airman Promotion System (WAPS) tests...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response, within 30 days (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion(s) appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.
They considered the length of time since discharge, the reason for the discharge, and the applicant’s otherwise honorable service. Additionally, on 5 February 2001, the AFBCMR staff provided the applicant copies of the FBI report and the Information Bulletin, for review and response within 30 days (Exhibit E). Exhibit B.
AFBCMR 00-03036 INDEX CODE: 124.04 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief...
According to DPPAE, a review of the applicant’s case file indicated that the Military Personnel Flight erroneously indicated on the AF Form 901 that he was entitled to a Zone C, Multiple Three (3.0), SRB. Furthermore, we believe that the Military Personnel Flight had the responsibility of providing the applicant with the correct information. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the...
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Military Personnel Division, AFRC/DPM, reviewed this application and indicated that the applicant’s pay files reflected that he was paid for the UTAs of 22/23 Jan 94 and 26/27 Feb 94. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MIBR, dated 2 Mar 01. RICHARD A. PETERSON Panel Chair AFBCMR 00-03038 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of...
The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Clarksburg, WV, provided an investigative report which is attached at Exhibit E. The FBI report was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit F). Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and will only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant evidence which was not reasonably...
Members of the Board, Mr. Robert W. Zook, Mr. Robert S. Boyd and Mr. Edward C. Koenig, III considered this application on 23 January 2001. ROBERT W. ZOOK Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, HQ AFPC/DPPAE, dtd 27 Dec 00 AFBCMR 00-033042 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of...
In addition to their current evaluation of applicant’s request they also provided a copy of the legal review done on the applicant’s original ERAB appeal in support of their recommendation. The complete evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C. _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant’s counsel responded to the Air Force evaluation in a nine- page brief with one enclosure. Counsel’s complete response is at...
INDEX CODE: 128.02 AFBCMR 00-03044 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-03046 INDEX CODE: 131.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The duty history portion of his Officer Selection Brief (OSB) for the CY00A (24 January 2000) major board reflect the following changes: the 23 June 1991 entry should reflect an entry of “Navigator” vice “Nacigator”; the 14 December 1991...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-03048 INDEX CODES: 100.06, 110.02, 110.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Special Order A1-175, dated 19 Aug 99, honorably discharging him from the Puerto Rico Air National Guard (PRANG) on 19 Aug 99 be invalidated. On 21 March 00, pursuant to its authority over federal labor/management...
He completed 2 years, 11 months, and 8 days of total active service. The Good Conduct Medal (GCM) is awarded upon completion of three years of honorable service. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that he was honorably discharged on 27 August 1949, rather than 4 August 1949, and awarded the Good Conduct Medal.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NO. The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D).
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His personnel record did not contain his OPR closing 31 May 00 and was not a matter of record to compliment his promotion recommendation. In support of his appeal, the applicant provided copies of his OPR closing 31 May 00 and his Promotion Recommendation Form (PRF). Applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A.
In support of his request applicant provided a personal statement; his temporary divorce order; documents associated with his request for investigation into his ex-wife’s testimony and request to convene the BOR; his discharge directive; initial and amended statements of reason; child support court order; AFPC/DPCTD employment letter; his divorce attorney’s letter; character reference; NPRC response to his request for copies of his BOR; correspondence from his Senator’s office; and, his...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-03068 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Purple Heart (PH). In support of the appeal, applicant submits his personal statement; a letter, dated 7 May 1945, concerning his combat performance; and a Veterans Administration (VA) decision, dated 28 September 1978, awarding him a...
Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief of Staff signed by the Executive Director of the Board or his designee. Members of the Board, Mr. David C. Van Gasbeck, Ms. Patricia D. Vestal, and Mr. Charles E. Bennett, considered this application on 2 February 2001. Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, ARPC/DPB, 19 Jan 01, w/atchs AFBCMR 00-03070 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under...
Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief of Staff signed by the Executive Director of the Board or his designee. Members of the Board Mr. Terry A. Yonkers, Mr. George Franklin, and Mr. Roger E. Willmeth, considered this application on 1 March 2001. Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, AFPC/DPPTR, dtd 6 Dec 00 AFBCMR 00-03071 INDEX CODE: 110.00 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under...
INDEX CODE: 128.05 AFBCMR 00-03072 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinions appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
AFBCMR 00-03078 INDEX NUMBER: 121.03 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: XXXXXXXXXXX, XXX-XX-XXXX Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Applicant's response to the advisory opinion is at Exhibit E. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). Applicant's response to the advisory opinions is at Exhibit E. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action. Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Applicant's response to the advisory opinion is at Exhibit E. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The complete evaluation is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: The applicant stated that at the time he was punished, he had a line number for promotion to E-5. Exhibit B. ROBERT W. ZOOK Panel Chair AFBCMR 00-03095 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-03099 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The reentry code be changed to allow him to enter into the Air Force Reserve. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The reasons the applicant believes the records to be in error or unjust and the...
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: As a tail gunner in a B-24 Bomber during World War II, his plane was gunned down by the Germans. ___________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Recognition Programs Branch, AFPC/DPPPR, indicates that the Purple Heart is awarded for wounds received as a direct result of enemy action. THOMAS C. MARKIEWICZ Panel Chair AFBCMR 00-03104 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF...
AFBCMR 00-03106 INDEX CODE: 100.02 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: SSAN: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Staff and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the...
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Chief Medical Consultant, AFBCMR, reviewed this application and states that a review of the records points to the possibility that the applicant was not entirely forthright in letting her Guard Unit know about the extent of her compensated disabilities. Clearly, if she was receiving disability compensation at the level provided by the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) for almost four years before...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.
Based on the information he received from the MPF, on 16 Aug 00, he reenlisted for a period of 6 years. The applicant states, and we believe, that he based his decision to reenlist on his entitlement to receive the SRB. RICHARD A. PETERSON Panel Chair AFBCMR 00-03317 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat...
AFBCMR 00-03118 INDEX NUMBER: 137.04 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Washington, D.C., provided an investigative report which is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Military Personnel Management Specialist, Separation Branch, AFPC/DPPRS, reviewed the application and states that the applicant provided no evidence indicating that he was the victim of an error or an injustice. DPPRS recommends that since the...
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Applicant's response to the advisory opinions is at Exhibit E. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
He states that the 4th Air Force commander affected the invalidation of the second nonjudicial punishment action, issued the second LOR, and was the imposing authority and selected the punishment for the third nonjudicial punishment action. The applicant states that there were three commanders between him and the 4th Air Force Commander. The applicant states that the 4th Air Force Commander had obviously taken away nonjudicial punishment authority from the subordinate commanders.
AFBCMR 00-03125 INDEX CODE: 137.00 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT, SSN Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying...
Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief of Staff signed by the Executive Director of the Board or his designee. Members of the Board Mr. David C. VanGasbeck, Ms. Patricia D. Vestal, and Mr. Joseph A. Roj, considered this application on 6 February 2001. Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, AFPC/DPPTR, dtd 14 Dec 00 AFBCMR 00-03126 INDEX CODE: 110.00 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF...
Members of the Board Mr. Robert W. Zook, Mr. Robert S. Boyd, and Mr. Edward C. Koenig III, considered this application on 23 Jan 01. Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, AFPC/DPPAE, dtd Jan 8, 01 AFBCMR 00-03127 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced,...
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.
AFBCMR 00-03129 Index Number 131.04 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum...
His AFCM (5OLC), awarded for the period 7 Oct 97 to 31 Jul 99, be upgraded to the Meritorious Service Medal (MSM). The Board recommended that the applicant’s EPR closing 24 May 97 be declared void and removed from his records; the AFAM (1OLC), rendered for the period 14 Aug 95 through 10 Sep 97, be removed from his records; he be awarded the AFCM for meritorious service for the period 14 Aug 95 through 10 Sep 97; and, that he be provided supplemental consideration for promotion to the grade...
The members of the Board, Messrs. Robert W. Zook, Robert S. Boyd, and Edward C. Koenig III, considered this application on 23 January 2001. Panel Chair Attachment: Ltrs, AFPC/DPPAE, dtd 4 Jan 01, w/atch AFBCMR 00-03131 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military...