RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-03040
INDEX CODE: 110.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: YES
Applicant requests that his general (under honorable conditions) discharge
be upgraded to an honorable discharge. Applicant's submission is at
Exhibit A.
On 27 October 1988, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied
applicant's request to upgrade his discharge to honorable (Exhibit B).
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided
an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be granted on
the basis of clemency, if a check of his Federal Bureau of Investigation,
(FBI) record proves negative (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was
forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D).
Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation,
Clarksburg, WV, provided an investigative report which is attached at
Exhibit E. The FBI report was forwarded to the applicant for review and
response (Exhibit F).
As of this date, no response has been received by this office to either the
advisory opinion or the FBI report.
After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available
evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to
warrant corrective action. We note that the Air Force recommends clemency
based on his overall record and his apparent post-service contributions to
the community, if his FBI record is clean. However, a review of his FBI
record indicates that the applicant’s misconduct has apparently continued
and this has not been rebutted by the applicant.
Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.
The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not been shown
that a personal appearance with or without counsel will materially add to
our understanding of the issue(s) involved. Therefore, the request for a
hearing is not favorably considered.
The Board staff is directed to inform applicant of this decision.
Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and will only
be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant evidence which was
not reasonably available at the time the application was filed.
Members of the Board Mr. Richard A. Peterson, Ms. Nancy W. Drury, and Mr.
John E. Pettit considered this application on 26 April 2001 in accordance
with the provisions of Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and the governing
statute, 10, U.S.C. 1552.
RICHARD A. PETERSON
Panel Chair
Exhibits:
A. Applicant's DD Form 149
B. Available Master Personnel Records
C. Advisory Opinion
D. SAF/MIBR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinion
E. FBI Report
F. AFBCMR Ltr Forwarding FBI Report
Applicant's submission is at Exhibit A. Pursuant to the Board's request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Clarksburg, WV, provided an investigative report which is attached at Exhibit C. The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit D). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit E). Applicant’s response to the advisory opinion is at...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be granted on the basis of clemency, if a check of his Federal Bureau of Investigation, (FBI) record proves negative (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and will only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant...
The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit E). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action. Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably considered.
Applicant's submission is at Exhibit A. Pursuant to the Board's request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Washington, D.C., provided an investigative report which is attached at Exhibit C. The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit D). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit E). After careful consideration of applicant's...
Applicant's submission is at Exhibit A. Pursuant to the Board's request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Washington, D.C., provided an investigative report which is attached at Exhibit C. The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit D). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit E). RICHARD A. PETERSON Panel Chair Exhibits: A.
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1998-01186
Applicant's submission is at Exhibit A. Pursuant to the Board's request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Washington, D.C., provided an investigative report which is attached at Exhibit C. The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit D). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit E). RICHARD A. PETERSON Panel Chair Exhibits: A.
Applicant's submission is at Exhibit A. Pursuant to the Board's request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Washington, D.C., provided an investigative report which is attached at Exhibit C. The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit D). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit E). RICHARD A. PETERSON Panel Chair Exhibits: A.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00726
On 27 September 1965, while serving in the grade of airman third class, he was discharged from the Air Force with an under honorable conditions discharge in the provisions of Chapter 2, Section B, AFM 39-12, for unfitness. On 22 July 2003, a copy of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Report was forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 30 days. Exhibit B. FBI Report.
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1993-00762A
A copy of the Record of Proceedings is attached at Exhibit E. In an application, dated 15 November 1997, the applicant requested reconsideration of his application on the merits. Applicant’s submission is attached at Exhibit F. The application has been reopened, and forwarded to the Board for reconsideration on the merits of the case. It appears that responsible officials applied appropriate standards in effecting the separation, and we do not find persuasive evidence that pertinent...
A copy of the Record of Proceedings is attached at Exhibit E. In an application, dated 15 November 1997, the applicant requested reconsideration of his application on the merits. Applicant’s submission is attached at Exhibit F. The application has been reopened, and forwarded to the Board for reconsideration on the merits of the case. It appears that responsible officials applied appropriate standards in effecting the separation, and we do not find persuasive evidence that pertinent...