RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-03038
INDEX CODE: 112.07
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His records be corrected to reflect no break in service for the period
of 11 Nov 93 to 9 Mar 94, and he be awarded pay and points for the Nov
93 and Dec 93 Unit Training Assemblies (UTAs).
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He separated from active duty in Nov 93 and went right into the Air
Force Reserve. There was no lapse between his active duty and Reserve
time.
In support of his appeal, the applicant provided a personal statement,
a supportive statement, and other documents associated with the matter
under review.
Applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Information extracted from the Personnel Data System (PDS) indicates
that the applicant is currently serving in the Air Force Reserve in
the grade of staff sergeant. He is credited with 15 years, 5 months,
and 4 days of satisfactory federal service.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are
contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air
Force. Accordingly, there is no need to recite these facts in this
Record of Proceedings.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The Military Personnel Division, AFRC/DPM, reviewed this application
and indicated that the applicant’s pay files reflected that he was
paid for the UTAs of 22/23 Jan 94 and 26/27 Feb 94. DPM noted that
the applicant was released from the Air Force under the PALACE CHASE
Program, effective 10 Nov 93, and was immediately assigned to the 301
Rescue Squadron (RQS) from Nov 93 to Feb 94. He subsequently
transferred to the 93 Fighter Squadron (FS), effective 1 Mar 94 and is
currently participating with the 93 FS.
Based on the supporting documentation provided in support of the
applicant’s appeal, DPM recommended that the applicant’s records be
corrected to reflect no break in service. However, since no
supporting documents were submitted to award him pay or points for the
Nov and Dec UTA, they recommended that the applicant not be awarded
pay or points for that timeframe.
A complete copy of the DPM evaluation is at Exhibit B.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to applicant on 2 Mar
01 for review and response. As of this date, no response has been
received by this office (Exhibit C).
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of probable error or injustice. Having carefully reviewed
this application, we agree with the recommendation of AFRC/DPM and
adopt their rationale as the basis for our decision that the applicant
has been the victim of an error or an injustice regarding his request
that his records be corrected to reflect no break in service.
Accordingly, we recommend that the applicant’s records be corrected as
indicated below.
4. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of probable error or injustice concerning the
applicant’s request for pay and points for the Nov 93 and Dec 93 UTAs.
While the available evidence supports the applicant’s contention that
he did not have a break in service, other than his own assertion, no
evidence has been presented which would lead us to believe that the
applicant performed the UTAs for Nov 93 and Dec 93. Therefore, in
absence of evidence to the contrary, the applicant’s request is not
favorably considered.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that he was honorably
discharged from the Regular Air Force on 10 Nov 93 and enlisted in the
Air Force Reserve on 11 Nov 93 for a period of two years.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 26 Jun 01, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Richard A. Peterson, Panel Chair
Mr. Laurence M. Groner, Member
Mr. Clarence D. Long III, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 6 Nov 00, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letter, AFRC/DPM, dated 31 Jan 01.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MIBR, dated 2 Mar 01.
RICHARD A. PETERSON
Panel Chair
AFBCMR 00-03038
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air
Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority
of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is
directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to , be corrected to show that he was honorably
discharged from the Regular Air Force on 10 Nov 93 and enlisted in the
Air Force Reserve on 11 Nov 93 for a period of two years.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-00509 INDEX CODE: 136.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be granted an Air Force Reserve retirement based on 20 satisfactory years of service. A memorandum, dated 18 Dec 97, indicated that the applicant, with an expiration term of service (ETS) of 12 Dec 97, had failed to reenlist and that...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1998-00509
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-00509 INDEX CODE: 136.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be granted an Air Force Reserve retirement based on 20 satisfactory years of service. A memorandum, dated 18 Dec 97, indicated that the applicant, with an expiration term of service (ETS) of 12 Dec 97, had failed to reenlist and that...
On 2 Feb 91, he enlisted in the Washington Air National Guard (ANG); he transferred to the Air Force Reserve on 10 Dec 92. On 19 Feb 95, he was discharged from the Air Force Reserve with a General discharge by reason of Defective Enlistment – Fraudulent Entry. On 5 Jul 94, HQ AFRES/CV approved the findings and recommendations and the case file was forwarded to the Air Force Personnel Board (AFPB) for a determination as to whether the applicant should receive Lengthy Service Probation (LSP).
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03878
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-03878 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 23 JUN 07 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The loss of good (satisfactory) years from Feb 03 to Sep 05 be reinstated, and she receive an enlisted incentive bonus payment and debt relief in the amount of $771.00 for Servicemember Group...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01394
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFRC/FMFQ indicates that original source documents received from the applicant’s unit of assignments indicate a total of 44 days of accrued leave were sold. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied...
The applicant should submit a request for the removal of the Article 15 to the commander who directed that it be placed in his records. In addition, the majority of the Board is sufficiently persuaded that the Article 15 should also be removed from the applicant’s record. Based on the available evidence of record, I find no basis upon which to favorably consider this portion of the application, and strongly recommend you deny the majority’s recommendation to remove the contested Article 15...
In support of his appeal, the applicant provided an expanded statement, copies of his retirement orders and revoked orders, and other documents associated to the matter under review. The evidence of record indicates that, contrary to his own assertion, the applicant voluntarily resigned his ART position, which rendered him ineligible for RSSP under RTAP. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
In support of his appeal, the applicant provided a statement from the Saint Francis Healthcare System of Hawaii, copies of his statements of earnings, several invoices, a certification for incapacitation pay, statements of lost wages, income tax form, medical documentation, and an AF Form 348, Line of Duty Determination. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-00132 INDEX CODE: 108.01, 110.02, 122.01 COUNSEL: Mr. MICHAEL J. CALABRO HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Not In Line of Duty (NLOD) determination be removed from his records; all documents and references pertaining to the NLOD determination be removed from his records; his request for transfer to the...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02838
In support of applicant’s appeal, he submitted a personal statement; an email, dated 19 May 03, from his military personnel flight to 4th AF/DPM concerning contractual errors; Reserve Order P- 045 reflecting promotion to staff sergeant, effective 1 Jul 91; copies of a 1 Sep 91 training certificate, a Report of Individual Personnel (RIP), dated 31 Jul 91, and a DD Form 2AF (Reserve) ID Card issued 17 Aug 91, all reflecting the rank of staff sergeant; copies of DD Form 214, Certificate of...