Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2001 | BC-2001-00597-2
Original file (BC-2001-00597-2.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
ADDENDUM TO
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:			 DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2001-00597-2
      
       COUNSEL:  NONE
					
							 HEARING DESIRED:  NO

________________________________________________________________
_

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

His records be corrected to reflect he was awarded the Purple 
Heart Medal.

________________________________________________________________
_

RESUME OF CASE:

On 11 July 2001, the Board considered and denied the applicant’s 
request to correct his record to reflect he was awarded the 
Purple Heart.  For an accounting of the facts and circumstances 
surrounding the applicant’s request for the award of the Purple 
Heart and the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, 
see the Record of Proceedings (ROP) at Exhibit E.  

On 18 July 2012, the applicant submitted a request for 
reconsideration.  As new evidence in support of his request, the 
applicant submits a personal statement, excerpts from his 
military personnel record and a newspaper article depicting the 
contested time-frame..

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit F.

________________________________________________________________
_

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

In earlier findings, the Board determined that there was 
insufficient evidence to warrant any corrective action.  After 
thoroughly reviewing the additional documentation submitted in 
support of his appeal and the evidence of record, we do not 
believe the applicant has overcome the rationale expressed in 
our previous decision.  Therefore, in view of the above, and in 
the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis upon 
which to recommend favorable consideration of the applicant’s 
request.

________________________________________________________________
_

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application.

________________________________________________________________
_

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2001-00597-2 in Executive Session on 1 August 2013, 
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
The following documentary evidence was considered:

     Exhibit E.  Record of Proceedings, dated 11 Jul 01, 
	            With Exhibits A through D.
     Exhibit F.  DD Form 149, dated 18 Jul 12, w/atchs.




Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00575

    Original file (BC-2012-00575.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. Therefore, in view of the fact the applicant has not provided any new and/or relevant evidence in support of his request for the PH Medal, we find that his request does not meet the criteria for reconsideration. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice;...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02859A

    Original file (BC-2003-02859A.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02859 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His record be corrected to reflect the award of the Purple Heart (PH). We carefully considered the documentation submitted with this appeal, to include the previous evidence and new statements provided by the applicant,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02379 2

    Original file (BC 2013 02379 2.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board determined that the evidence provided by the applicant was insufficient to conclude that he was the victim of an error or injustice, noting that although he provided recent medical documentation indicating a shrapnel injury to his knee, the applicant had not provided any evidence showing the injury was the direct result of the action of an enemy. While the original Record of Proceedings (ROP) erroneously identified the applicant’s injury as a knee injury, rather than a pelvic...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC 2010 01445 2

    Original file (BC 2010 01445 2.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant’s request, and the rationale for the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings, with Exhibits, at Exhibit F. By virtue of a letter dated 12 Feb 12, with attachments, the applicant requests reconsideration of his request and provides copies of medical documentation related to his injury, an eyewitness statement, and documentation pertaining to the 2 Sep 06 rocket attack. His complete submission,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01445-2

    Original file (BC-2010-01445-2.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant’s request, and the rationale for the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings, with Exhibits, at Exhibit F. By virtue of a letter dated 12 Feb 12, with attachments, the applicant requests reconsideration of his request and provides copies of medical documentation related to his injury, an eyewitness statement, and documentation pertaining to the 2 Sep 06 rocket attack. His complete submission,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-1990-00446A

    Original file (BC-1990-00446A.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    He be awarded the Purple Heart (PH) for injuries he received on 26 December 1969. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 27 June 1990, the Board considered the applicant’s request that he be awarded the PH, and that his record, to include the DFC awarded for extraordinary achievement during the period 19 August 1969 to 3 July 1970, be considered for promotion to the grade of colonel by an SSB for the Calendar Years 1987 and 1989 (CY87 &...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00597

    Original file (BC-2004-00597.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The AFBCMR Medical Consultant recommends denial of the applicant’s request. Evidence of record indicates that the applicant performed his duties in a satisfactory manner up to the time of his voluntary release from active duty. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2006-00002-1

    Original file (BC-2006-00002-1.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-00002 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded of the Purple Heart (PH) medal for an injury he incurred in Germany. The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit E. Record of Proceedings, dated 20 Apr 06, w/Exhibits. THOMAS S....

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01795

    Original file (BC 2013 01795.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RESUME OF THE CASE On 13 Feb 14, the Board considered and denied the applicant’s original request for her deceased father to be awarded the PH. She contends that during a bombing mission on 25 Jun 44, her father received multiple shrapnel wounds to his lower extremities as the direct result of enemy fire which required medical attention. In support of her contention, she submits documentation showing her father was placed on a seven-day leave of absence on or about 1 Jul 44; cites Army...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2006-00456-2

    Original file (BC-2006-00456-2.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, since no new and relevant evidence has been provided, we find the request does not meet the criteria for reconsideration. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the additional evidence presented did not meet the criteria for reconsideration by the Board; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application....