RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-02086
INDEX CODE: 110.00
APPLICANT COUNSEL: None
SSN HEARING DESIRED: No
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Her brother's bad conduct discharge be upgraded to under honorable
conditions (general) to allow him a burial in a national cemetery.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The reasons the applicant believes the records to be in error or
unjust and the evidence submitted in support of the appeal are at
Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the
applicant's military records, are contained in the letter prepared by
the appropriate office of the Air Force. Accordingly, there is no
need to recite these facts in this Record of Proceedings.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The Assistant, NCOIC, Separation Procedures Section, Separations
Branch, AFPC/DPPRS, reviewed the application and states that based
upon the evidence in the service member's records they believe the
discharge was in compliance with the discharge regulations and that
the discharge was within the sound discretion of the discharge
authority. Therefore, based on the evidence provided they recommend
denying the applicant's request.
A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant on 14 Sep 01, for review and response. As of this date, no
response has been received by this office.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of probable error or injustice. After a thorough
review of the evidence of record and the applicant’s submission, the
Board agrees with the opinions and recommendations of the Air Force
and adopts their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the
service member has not been the victim of an error or injustice. We
have considered the service member's overall quality of service and
in view of the numerous instances of misconduct while the service
member was on active duty, we do not believe that clemency is
warranted. The applicant presented no documented evidence of the
service member's post-service activities and accomplishments.
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no
compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this
application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice;
that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application on
October 23, 2001, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Ms. Patricia D. Vestal, Panel Chair
Mr. Billy C. Baxter, Member
Mr. Mike Novel, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 14 Aug 01, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPRS, dated 31 Aug 01.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 14 Sep 01.
PATRICIA D. VESTAL
Panel Chair
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant's military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and the applicant’s submission, the Board agrees with the opinions and recommendations of the Air Force and adopts their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that...
He received an uncharacterized entry level separation on 21 Aug 01 under the provisions of AFI 36-3208 (fraudulent entry into military service). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force at Exhibits C and D. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPRS stated that, on 15 Aug 01, the...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-03141 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general discharge be upgraded and his Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be changed from “2B” to “3A.” _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His discharge was inequitable and his service should have...
___________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Separations Branch, AFPC/DPPRS, reviewed this application and recommended upgrading the discharge to general on the basis of clemency, provided a check of FBI files proves negative. ___________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that, on 7...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-02576 INDEX NUMBER: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable discharge be upgraded to general under honorable conditions discharge. At that time, the applicant was also invited to provide additional evidence pertaining to his activities since leaving the service (Exhibit F). We...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01413
He was honorably released from active duty on 10 Apr 03 with one year and seven months of active service for that period and transferred to the VTANG. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPRS notes there are no documents in the applicant’s personnel record pertaining to his discharge process or the misconduct leading up to his discharge from active duty since they were apparently purged by the ARPC in 2001. ...
Nothing in the records or that is provided by the applicant indicates an error was committed or injustice served in the type of discharge received. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. The Military Personnel Management Specialist, AFPC/DPPRS, reviewed this application and concurs with the BCMR Medical Consultant’s recommendation that the applicant’s narrative reason for separation and separation code should remain the same. ...
The applicant applied to the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records (AFBCMR) in Jul 00 to upgrade his discharge to honorable. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Directorate of Personnel Program Management, HQ AFPC/DPPRS, evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied on the basis that regardless of the fact the AFBCMR upgraded his discharge, he was still...
The RE code which was issued at the time of applicant’s separation accurately reflects the circumstances of her separation and we do not find this code to be in error or unjust. In view of the foregoing, we recommend the applicant’s records be corrected by deleting the words “and conduct” from her narrative reason for separation. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air...
In support of his appeal, the applicant submitted a letter of character reference from his pastor and deacon board; a copy of his DD Form 214, Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States and his Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) Hearing record. Applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. He also states that when he was discharged, he was told that in six months his discharge would be upgraded.