The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant for review and response, within 30 days (Exhibit D). Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably considered.
In support of his appeal, the applicant provided documentation pertaining to the termination of his discharge and copies of his member activity reports. The administrative discharge action was terminated on 20 November 2000, and the applicant was retained in the United States Air Force Reserve. Accordingly, a majority of the Board recommends that the applicant’s records be corrected as indicated below.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-01038 INDEX NUMBER: 126.04 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The nonjudicial punishment under Article 15, UCMJ, imposed on 22 January 1999, be set aside and that all references to the Article 15 action be expunged from his record. The applicant provided no evidence of a clear error or...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.
Although the certificate was not in the applicant’s records, the board members saw the documentation (OSB, dated 15 Nov 00), reflecting that she was board certified (Exhibit C). The Officer Promotion and Appointment Branch, HQ AFPC/DPPPOO, stated that eligible officers are provided an officer preselection brief (OPB) approximately 100 days prior to board convening date along with an instruction sheet that outlines how to correct discrepancies prior to the start of a promotion board. While...
AFBCMR 01-01047 INDEX CODE: 131.02 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: SSAN: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Staff and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the...
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinions appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.
At that time, the applicant was also invited to provide additional evidence pertaining to his activities since leaving the service (Exhibit G). After careful consideration of the available facts contained in the Air Force Discharge Review Board brief surrounding the applicant’s discharge, we find no impropriety in the characterization of the applicant’s discharge. Exhibit B.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The other documents in his record completed on his entry into the Air Force are dated 6 Sep 80. He believes it is rational to conclude that he would have signed the Addendum to AF Form 1056 at the same time he signed the AF Form 1056 itself. This document shows the applicant’s first enlistment as an Air Force Reserve member was on 8 Sep 80.
AFBCMR 01-01058 INDEX NUMBER: 128.00 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
_______________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Chief, Promotion, Evaluation, and Recognition Division evaluated this application and recommends denial of replacement of the contested OPR with a corrected report, but does recommend that the applicant’s duty title be changed to “Inspector General.” The memorandum the applicant included from her rater confirms that she had been assigned as IG since 6 Jul 99, but the CAG title was used. ...
AFBCMR 01-01062 INDEX CODE: 110.02 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and AFI 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, SSN, be corrected to show that: a. On 25 September 2000, in...
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was advised by a Military Personnel Flight (MPF) representative, that if volunteered for an overseas assignment and extended his current enlistment for a period of 36 months to obtain the required retainability, he would receive a Zone C Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) upon entering into the extension. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS...
Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief of Staff signed by the Executive Director of the Board or his designee. Members of the Board Mr. Henry Romo, Jr., Mr. Clyde L. Williams, and Ms. Ann-Cecile McDermott, considered this application on 15 November 2001. Ltr, AFPC/DPPD, dtd 25 Oct 01 AFBCMR 01-01066 INDEX CODES: 107.00, 108.05 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-01070 INDEX CODE: 111.01 COUNSEL: MR. FRED L. BAUER HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The referral Officer Performance Report (OPR) closing 31 May 1999 and any mention of his relief of command be removed from his records and his corrected record be considered for promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel....
Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief of Staff signed by the Executive Director of the Board or his designee. Members of the Board Mr. Richard A. Peterson, Mr. Laurence M. Groner, and Mr. Clarence D. Long III, considered this application on 26 June 2001. RICHARD A. PETERSON Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, AFPC/DPPAE, dtd 4 Jun 01 AFBCMR 01-01073 INDEX CODE: 112.07 MEMORANDUM...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-01074 INDEX CODE: 131.05 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His date of rank (DOR) to second lieutenant (2Lt) be recalculated to provide 100% credit for the months he spent completing his degree in the Air Force Institute of Technology (AFIT) Educational Delay Program (EDP). However, he...
He recommended that the applicant be discharged with a general discharge. That office states that, based upon the documentation in the file, they believe the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation. Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPPRS, dated 9 May 01.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit B). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit C). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief of Staff signed by the Executive Director of the Board or his designee. Members of the Board Mr. Henry Romo, Jr., Mr. Albert F. Lowas, Jr., and Mr. John E. Pettit, considered this application on 14 June 2001. Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, AFPC/DPSFM, dtd 18 May 01 AFBCMR 01-01081 INDEX CODE: 121.03 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF...
The Chief, Review Boards Office, SAF/MIBR, informed the applicant, by letter, dated 26 Jul 01, that the National Personnel Records Center (NPRC), St. Louis, Missouri, was unable to locate his personnel records. The Chief requested the applicant confer with his military personnel representatives for assistance in locating pertinent records and if he had other documents relating to his Air Force service other than the DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge From Active Duty), he...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.
He was not discharged because of the failure. Based on applicant’s failure in his CDC’s and no record of misconduct, the SJA recommended that the applicant be separated from the Air Force with an honorable discharge without probation and rehabilitation. We therefore agree with the recommendations of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has failed to sustain his burden that he has suffered either an error or an injustice.
Additionally, he provided no facts warranting a change in his separation code. A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. The Assistant Chief, Skills Management Branch, HQ AFPC/DPPAE, reviewed the applicant’s request and states the Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of 2C, “Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service” is correct. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the...
The service member can file an election change or the former spouse can request that the change be made on their behalf. DPPTR on 19 Apr 01, requested that the service member provide documents that are required to establish former spouse coverage--copy of his final divorce decree and a properly completed DD Form 2656-1, Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) Election Statement for Former Spouse Coverage. Should these completed documents be submitted, the Board would be willing to reconsider this case.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-01097 INDEX CODE 131.03 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show that he was promoted to the grade of technical sergeant (E-6) and that he be given additional campaign participation credit. Exhibit D. Letter, Applicant, 1 Jun 01. PATRICK R. WHEELER Panel...
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.
AF Form 988 (Leave Request/Authorization) provided by the applicant reflects that on 7 Mar 01, he requested 30 days of leave from 19 Mar 01 to 19 Apr 01, with a DOS of 19 Apr 01. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Noncommissioned Officer-In-Charge (NCOIC), Separation Procedures Section, AFPC/DPPRS, reviewed this application and indicated that although the applicant states his DOS should have been 19 Apr 01, the separation documents in...
Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief of Staff signed by the Executive Director of the Board or his designee. Members of the Board, Mr. Joseph G. Diamond, Mr. Grover L. Dunn, Mr. John E. B. Smith considered this application on 15 August 2001. AFBCMR 01-01100 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.
AFBCMR 01-01106 INDEX NUMBER: 121.03 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: XXXXXXXXXXX, XXX-XX-XXXX Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be...
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant's military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that on the 30 Jun 1952 he...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-01110 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her narrative reason for discharge be changed from “Personality Disorder” to either “Panic Disorder” or simply state “Medical discharge without diagnosis shown.” By amendment at Exhibit G, applicant requests that her DD Form 214...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The applicant’s response is at Exhibit E. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The applicant’s response to the advisory opinion is at Exhibit E. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action. Members of the Board, Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Mr. Steven A. Shaw, and Ms. Barbara J....
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Director of Personnel Program Management, HQ ARPC/DPP, stated that the member began drawing Air Force Reserve retired pay effective 5 Aug 93, his 60th birthday, until his death on 18 Jul 98. A complete copy of this evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reviewed the advisory opinion and...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-01120 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: MR. STEPHEN K. RYTHER HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: A DD Form 215 be issued citing all awards, citations, medals and ribbons for his active duty service in South Vietnam. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-01129 INDEX CODE: 108.0 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be evaluated by a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) to determine her medical status at the time of her administrative discharge, and that she receive a disability discharge/retirement under the provisions of AFI 36-3212. A complete copy...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.
However, the applicant has requested that his application be reconsidered because he believes an injustice still exists with the corrected DOR of 1 March 2001. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that he was promoted to the grade of master sergeant (E-7), Reserve of the Air Force, with an effective date and date of rank of 1...
_________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: A majority of the panel finds insufficient evidence of error or injustice and recommends the application be denied. Exhibit B. A majority found that the applicant had not provided sufficient evidence of error or injustice and recommended the case be denied.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reviewed the Air Force evaluation and states that he was only 17 years of age at the time of the alleged misconduct. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be...
AFBCMR 01-01146 INDEX NUMBER: 100.03 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth...