Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0101120
Original file (0101120.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  01-01120
            INDEX CODE:  107.00
            COUNSEL:  MR. STEPHEN K. RYTHER

            HEARING DESIRED:  YES

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

A DD Form 215 be issued citing all awards,  citations,  medals  and  ribbons
for his active duty service in South Vietnam.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He was sent to South Vietnam on numerous occasions and  was  awarded  combat
pay for these tours.  He feels that he served over sixty days in Vietnam.

In support of his application  he  submitted  copies  of  three  TDY  orders
sending him to Vietnam and a copy of his DD Form 214.  Applicant’s  complete
submission is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air  Force  in  the  grade  of  airman
basic (E-1) on 3 January 1964.  Records reflect an overseas tour  in  Taiwan
for the period 24 December 1966  –  14 December  1967.   The  applicant  was
awarded the National Defense Service Medal.  He  was  released  from  active
duty on 15 December 1967.  He had served 3 years, 11 months and 13  days  on
active duty.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

The  Chief,  Recognition  Programs   Branch,   AFPC/DPPPR,   reviewed   this
application and recommends denial. DPPPR states that based on the  Temporary
Duty Orders provided by the applicant, it is not possible to  verify  if  he
was  actually  deployed  to  Vietnam.   Additionally,  his  records  do  not
indicate that he performed any TDY while in Taiwan (See Exhibit C).

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded  to  the  applicant  on  15
June 2001 for review and response within 30 days.  As  of  this  date,  this
office has received no response.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing  law  or
regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest  of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence  of  probable  error  or  injustice.   We  took  notice   of   the
applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case;  however,
we agree with the opinion and recommendation of  the  Air  Force  office  of
primary responsibility that copies  of  Travel  Orders  are  not  sufficient
evidence  to  indicate  the  applicant  performed  30  consecutive   or   60
nonconsecutive days  in  Vietnam.   Should  the  applicant  have  supportive
documentation, such as Travel Vouchers, to indicate  actual  time  spent  in
Vietnam,  the  Board  would  be  willing  to  again  consider  his  request.
Accordingly, we find no basis to  favorably act on his request.

4.  The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not been  shown
that a personal appearance with or without counsel will  materially  add  to
our understanding of the issue  involved.   Therefore,  the  request  for  a
hearing is not favorably considered.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence of probable material error or injustice; that the  application
was denied without a personal appearance;  and  that  the  application  will
only be reconsidered  upon  the  submission  of  newly  discovered  relevant
evidence not considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered this application in  Executive
Session on 24 July 2001, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

      Mr. Richard A. Peterson, Panel Chair
      Mr. Michael V. Barbino, Member
      Mr. William H. Anderson, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 16 April 2001 w/atchs.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPPPR, dated 4 June 2001.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MIBR, dated 15 June 2001.




                                   RICHARD A. PETERSON
                                   Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02484

    Original file (BC-2002-02484.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The author recommends the applicant be credited with at least 30 days TDY to Tuy Hoa AB, Vietnam during 18 Mar 68 to 13 Apr 69. If it was stamped in Vietnam any time after 28 Mar 68, the applicant could not have been there for 30 days since his medical records show he was in a fistfight in Taiwan on 18 Apr 68 and was hospitalized until 24 Apr 68. While the possibility exists that the applicant may have been in Vietnam at some time, he has provided no evidence verifying that he was TDY...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9703191

    Original file (9703191.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Air Force indicates that AF Form 7 (Airman Military Record), Item 2, reflects the applicant served in the Air Force from 25 Oct 66 - 16 Sep 79, with two tours in Taiwan: 30 Apr 67 - 30 May 68 2 JUl 69 - 2 OCt 70 Airlift Squadron Organizational Maintenance On 10 Nov 97, AFPC/DPAIPl requested the applicant furnish copies of TDY orders, Travel Vouchers, etc., in order to substantiate his claim. In response, the applicant submitted a photograph and a letter from an individual, dated 28 Nov...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-03221

    Original file (BC-2002-03221.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-03221 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS: Award of the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM). DPPPR finds no indication in the applicant’s records that he served in Vietnam. The HQ AFPC/DPPPR evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03221

    Original file (BC-2002-03221.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-03221 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS: Award of the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM). DPPPR finds no indication in the applicant’s records that he served in Vietnam. The HQ AFPC/DPPPR evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02285

    Original file (BC-2003-02285.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty, issued in conjunction with his 15 October 1973 release from active duty, be amended to include the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPR recommends denial of the applicant’s request for the Vietnam Service Medal...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02634

    Original file (BC-2005-02634.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    --The Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVNCM) is awarded to members who: (1) served for six months in South Vietnam during the period 1 Mar 61 and 28 Mar 73; (2) served outside the geographical limits of South Vietnam and contributed direct combat support to the RVN Armed Forces for an aggregate of six months--only members who meet the criteria established for the AFEM (Vietnam) or the VSM during the period required are considered to have contributed direct combat support to the RVN Armed...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00675

    Original file (BC-2003-00675.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-00675 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Korean Defense Service Medal, The Republic of Korea Service Cease-Fire Period Medal, The Republic of China 823 Campaign Badge of Honor, the Republic of China U.S. Mutual Defense Commemorative Badge, the Air...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03721

    Original file (BC-2006-03721.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or an injustice. The applicant did not provide any documentation showing he was assigned or TDY to Korea. There is no documentation in the applicant’s military records to reflect he was assigned or TDY to Korea.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00122

    Original file (BC-2003-00122.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-00122 INDEX CODE: 107.00 APPLICANT COUNSEL: None SSN HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect award of the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinions and the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9802698

    Original file (9802698.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Chief, Awards and Decorations Section, Promotion, Evaluation, & Recognition Division, HQ AFPC/DPPPR, reviewed this application and states that without documentation showing the applicant actually accomplished the TDY to Saudi Arabia during January through May 1994, they can not verify his eligibility for the SWASM with 1 Bronze Service Star. Exhibit B. VAUGHN E. SCHLUNZ Panel Chair AFBCMR...