RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-00100
INDEX CODE: 135.02
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
He be given Montgomery GI Bill benefits based on his active, Reserve
and Guard duty.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He served on active duty for 2 ½ years. He separated under the Air
Force Reserve and finished his contract in the Air National Guard. He
was honorably discharged and served in Dessert Shield.
Applicant's complete submission is attached at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 7 May 1991, for a
period of four years.
The applicant, while serving in the grade of Senior Airman, was
released from the Air Force on 29 September 1993 with an honorable
discharge. He served 2 years, 4 months, and 23 days active service.
He was separated under Palace Chase and affiliated with the Air Force
Reserve and, later, the Air National Guard (ANG). On 13 December
1996, he was honorably discharged from the ANG because of separation
of hit term of service.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The Chief, Education Services Automation Section, AFPC/DPPAT, reviewed
the application and states, to qualify for benefits, the Montgomery GI
Bill, 38 U.S.C. Chapter 30, requires individuals to sign a statement
of understanding, have their pay reduced by $1200, serve a minimum
period of active duty, and receive an honorable discharge/separation.
The Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) adjudicates each application
and grants benefits to those individuals who qualify. The statement
of understanding says individuals must complete 36 months of active
duty…and the pay reduction cannot be refunded…. Individuals may,
however, serve a minimum of 24 months if, within one year of leaving
active duty, they affiliate with a Selected Reserve or Guard unit.
They must then satisfactorily participate in a drilling status for
four years.
They further state that the applicant met the active duty requirement
and participated in the Reserve and Guard for three years six months.
After completing his contract to participate in the Guard the
applicant entered the Individual Ready Reserve (December 1996 -
January 1999) to complete his Military Service Obligation. The
Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) adjudicator denied the
applicant’s claim because he didn’t meet the minimum participation
requirement of four years. Therefore, they recommend denial of
applicant’s request.
A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 16 March 2001, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to
applicant for review and response within 30 days. As of this date, no
response has been received by this office.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of probable error or injustice. While no errors in his
separation from active duty or the Air National Guard can be detected,
we do believe that the applicant has been the victim of an injustice.
In this respect, we note that the applicant was separated from active
duty prior to serving 36 months. This action was due to the Air Force
drawdown program. Applicant served in the Air Force Reserve and Air
National Guard for three years and six months. Since applicant did
not serve 36 months on active duty or 48 months in the Reserves, he
was not eligible for Montgomery GI Bill benefits. We believe that had
the applicant been informed that failure to complete the required
active duty or reserves time would deny him eligibility for GI Bill
benefits, he would have served the required time. Furthermore, we
note that his service while on active duty and in the Reserves/Air
National Guard was honorable. In view of the above and to offset any
possibility of an injustice, we recommend his records be corrected to
the extent indicated below.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that:
a. On 13 December 1996, he was not discharged from the Oregon Air
National Guard but on that date he continued to serve in the Air
National Guard.
b. During retirement/retention (R/R) year 30 September 1996
through 29 September 1997, he was credited with an additional 27
nonpaid inactive training points, resulting in 50 total points.
c. On 1 October 1997, he was honorably discharged from the Oregon
Air National Guard and transferred to Air Reserve Personnel Center.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 9 May 2001, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Panel Chair
Mr. Thomas J. Topolski, Jr., Member
Ms. Mary C. Johnson, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 8 Jan 01, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPAT, dated 1 Mar 01.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 16 Mar 01.
THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
Panel Chair
AFBCMR 01-00100
INDEX CODE: 135.02
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air
Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority
of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is
directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to, be corrected to show that:
a. On 13 December 1996, he was not discharged from
the Oregon Air National Guard but on that date he continued to serve
in the Air National Guard.
b. During retirement/retention (R/R) year 30
September 1996 through 29 September 1997, he was credited with an
additional 27 nonpaid inactive training points, resulting in 50 total
points, making it a year of satisfactory Federal Service for
retirement..
c. On 1 October 1997, he was honorably discharged
from the Oregon Air National Guard and transferred to Air Reserve
Personnel Center.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03873
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-03873 INDEX NUMBER: 128.00 XXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXX-XX-XXXX HEARING DESIRED: No _____________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be made eligible for Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB) benefits. The law stipulates all MGIB- eligible individuals are automatically enrolled in the MGIB upon entering active duty and are given a one-time opportunity...
Ltr, AFBCMR, dtd Aug 10, 00 4. Ltr, applicant, dtd Nov 2, 00, w/atchs AFBCMR 95-02481 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to , be corrected...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00006
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant’s request for an upgrade of discharge on 21 August 2002. A complete copy of the Record of Proceedings is attached at Exhibit C. On 28 August 2003, the AFBCMR considered and denied applicant’s request that his reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be upgraded. A complete copy of the Record of Proceedings is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPAT...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-1999-01513
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-1999-01513 INDEX CODE: 135.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: In the applicant’s request for reconsideration, he requests that the additional nonpaid Inactive Duty Training (IDT) points initially approved by the Board be changed to paid IDT points. The applicant’s complete...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action with regard to her request for a VSI separation.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03471
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-03471 INDEX CODE: COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to participate in the Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB) program. His records reflect his decision to disenroll from the MGIB. After serving over five years and paying the required $1200, the Air Force states that he elected not to...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-01091
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-01091 INDEX CODE: 100.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He receive a waiver of his second term of enlistment and be made eligible for the Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB) benefit upon his release from active duty, or be reimbursed for the $1,800.00 he invested in the MGIB program. He also...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00802
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-00802 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her narrative reason for separation be changed for the purpose of qualifying for Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB) benefits under Category III and Category IV. She had completed a total of 2 years, 3 months and 17 days of active service...
Members of the Board, Mr. David C. VanGasbeck, Mr. Richard A. Peterson, and Mr. Roscoe Hinton, Jr. considered this application on 18 July 2001. DAVID C. VANGASBECK Panel Chair Attachment: Letter, ANG/DPFP, dated 11 Jun 01 AFBCMR 00-03351 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01719
There is no DD Form 2057, Contributory Educational Assistance Program Statement of Understanding or DD Form 2366, Montgomery GI Bill Act of 1984 (MGIB) on file. The VEAP was enacted by Congress to provide education benefits for individuals entering active duty between 1 Jan 77 and 30 Jun 85. The Air Force is not responsible for a personal decision made relative to a voluntary program when that program was well-known and regularly briefed to all eligible personnel.