RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-00061
INDEX CODE: 110.00
COUNSEL: THE AMERICAN LEGION
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His undesirable discharge be upgraded to a discharge under honorable
conditions.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He was intoxicated, passed out and awoke to find a man in bed with him
trying to perform a homosexual act with him. He was embarrassed and
humiliated and did not report the incident at the time. He did not receive
an Article 15 or a court-marital and he did not receive due process of law
according to Air Force regulations. He was not informed of anything that
was happening. He was humiliated and disappointed in the unfair way he was
treated. He tried to forget that part of his life and struggled to make a
new life for himself and his family. Regardless of his unfortunate
circumstances; i.e., a fifth grade education, an undesirable discharge,
lack of work and financial burdens, he managed to raise five upstanding
children, work steadily, provide a good home and education for his family
and he is a respected member of his community. He has maintained a
flawless criminal record and has not received so much as a speeding ticket.
He has not consumed alcohol in over 30 years.
He is 68 years old and has had a five bypass heart operation. His only
sources of income are Social Security and Medicare. He once again finds
himself in financial stress. A discharge upgrade would allow him to enroll
in the Veterans Administration medical care system for health care and
prescription assistance for heart medication which costs approximately $500
each month.
The applicant's complete submission is attached at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 23 May 1952, in the grade of
airman basic for a period of 4 years.
On 2 August 1955, the applicant was notified of his commander's intent to
initiate discharge action against him because there was reason to believe
that the applicant was a class II homosexual. The commander recommended an
undesirable discharge.
The commander advised him that he had a right to consult legal counsel, the
right to present his case before an administrative discharge board, to
submit statements in his own behalf or to waive his rights to an
administrative discharge board. The applicant consulted counsel, waived
his right to a Board hearing, and did not submit a statement in his own
behalf.
The discharge authority approved an undesirable discharge.
The applicant was subsequently discharged on 7 October 1955, in the grade
of A3C with an undesirable discharge, under the provisions of AFR 35-66
(Homosexuality). He completed 3 years, 4 months and 6 days of total active
military service.
Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation,
Clarksburg, WV, indicated on 6 June 2001, that, on the basis of the data
furnished, they are unable to locate an arrest record.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The Separations Branch, HQ AFPC/DPPRS, reviewed this application and
recommended clemency based on the following facts: The discharge occurred
over 44 years ago. The applicant is a respected member of his community.
He was married at the time of the incident and is still married. He has
raised five children. He had a low level of education and may not have
been aware of his rights. Under current Department of Defense and Air
Force guidelines, the member would have received a discharge
characterization of under honorable conditions (general) since his records
do not indicate he attempted, solicited, or committed a homosexual act by
using force, coercion, or intimidation. Therefore, they recommended that
his discharge be upgraded to a general (under honorable conditions)
discharge.
A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the evaluation was forwarded to the applicant and his counsel on
27 April 2001, for review and response within 30 days (Exhibits D-1 and D-
2). As of this date, no response has been received by this office.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of probable error or injustice. Although the available record
does not substantiate that the applicant's discharge was improper or
contrary to the provisions of the governing regulation in effect at the
time, and he provided no evidence regarding his activities since leaving
the service, we are persuaded that corrective action is appropriate on the
basis of clemency. We noted that knowledgeable officials have indicated to
our satisfaction that he has no arrest record and no derogatory information
on file. Therefore, we are in agreement with the opinion and
recommendation of the appropriate Air Force office, HQ AFPC/DPPRS, that
considering the applicant’s age and apparent immaturity at the time of the
incident and his stated contributions to society over the past 44 years,
his discharge should be upgraded to general. Accordingly, we recommend
that the records be corrected as indicated below.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating
to APPLICANT be corrected to show that, on 7 October 1955, he was
discharged with service characterized as general (under honorable
conditions).
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive
Session on 27 June 2001, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Joseph A. Roj, Panel Chair
Ms. Margaret A. Zook, Member
Mr. Roscoe Hinton, Jr., Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The following
documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 14 Mar 2001, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Available Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPRS, dated 9 Apr 2001.
Exhibit D. Letters, SAF/MIBR, dated 27 Apr 2001.
Exhibit E. FBI Report, dated 6 Jun 2001.
MARGARET A. ZOOK
Acting Panel Chair
AFBCMR 01-00061
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section
1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to, be corrected to show that on 7 October 1955, he was discharged
with service characterized as general (under honorable conditions).
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01937
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 03-01937 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable discharge be upgraded to honorable. Applicant’s application is at Exhibit A. Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) provided a copy of an investigative report pertaining to the...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01568
The Board found that the applicant did commit an act of homosexuality and recommended he be discharged from the Air Force with a general discharge. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 8 December 1955, he was discharged with service characterized as general (under honorable conditions). JOE G....
On 3 Jan 45, the Report of Proceedings of the Board of Officers findings were that the applicant gave evidence of traits of character other than those indicating discharge for physical or mental conditions as provided for in Section II (he was unfit to associate with enlisted men). Based on information contained in applicant’s application, information contained in the Discharge Board proceedings and applicant’s master personnel records, DPPRS finds no new evidence to indicate his discharge,...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02513
After the encounter, the airman involved reported the incident to Air Force authorities. DPPRS states the applicant was separated from the Air Force under the provisions of AFR 35-66, Discharge of Homosexuals, with an undesirable discharge. NOVEL Panel Chair DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON DC [pic] Office Of The Assistant Secretary AFBCMR BC-2006-02513 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00045
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-00045 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to honorable. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air...
The Board recommended discharge from the service because of unfitness, with an undesirable discharge. Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Clarksburg, West Virginia, provided an investigative report which is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 15 Feb 01, the Separations Branch, HQ AFPC/DPPRS, reviewed the application and states that the applicant did not provide evidence of errors...
The applicant did not submit evidence or identify any errors in the discharge processing nor provide facts which warrant an upgrade of the discharge he received over 48 years ago. Should the applicant provide additional documentation pertaining to his post-service activities, the Board may be willing to reconsider his request for clemency at a later time. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence...
The applicant did not submit evidence or identify any errors in the discharge processing nor provide facts which warrant an upgrade of the discharge he received over 48 years ago. Should the applicant provide additional documentation pertaining to his post-service activities, the Board may be willing to reconsider his request for clemency at a later time. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence...
Pursuant to the Board's request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Clarksburg, WV, provided a report of Applicant’s arrest record (Exhibit C). After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant’s submission, we are unpersuaded that relief should be granted. Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MIBR, dated 19 May 00.
A complete copy of the Air Staff evaluation is attached at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reviewed the Air Force evaluation and states the incident on the FBI report is correct, but he has since that time earned his Master's and Journeyman's license in plumbing. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of...