Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 06337-03
Original file (06337-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE  NAVY 

B O A R D   F O R   C O R R E C T I O N O F N A V A L R E C O R D S  

2  N A V Y  A N N E X  

W A S H I N G T O N   D C   2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0  

MEH:ecb 
Docket No:  6337-03 
21 October 2003 

This is in  reference to your application for correction of your  naval  record  pursuant to the 
provisions of  title  10 of  the United  States Code, section  1552. 

A  three-member panel of  the Board  for Correction of  Naval  Records,  sitting in  executive session, 
considered your application on  21  October 2003.  Your  allegations of  error and  injustice were 
reviewed  in  accordance with  administrative regulations and  procedures applicable to the 
proceedings of  this Board.  Documentary  material considered by  the Board  consisted of  your 
application, together  with  all  material submitted in  support thereof, your  naval  record and 
applicable statutes, regulations and  policies.  In  addition, the Board  considered the advisory 
opinion  furnished by  PERS  memorandum  1160 Ser 81 1/45 1 dated 26 September 2003, a copy of 
which  is attached. 

After  careful and  conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board  found that the 
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish  the existence of  probable material error or 
injustice.  In  this connection, the Board  substantially concurred with  the comments contained in 
the advisory opinion.  Accordingly, your application  has been  denied.  The names and  votes of 
the members of  the panel  will be  furnished upon  request. 

It is regretted  that  the circumstances of  your  case are such  that favorable action cannot be taken. 
You  are entitled to have the Board  reconsider its decision upon  submission of  new  and  material 
evidence or other matter  not previously considered by  the Board.  In  this regard, it is important 
to keep in  mind  that a presumption  of  regularity attaches to all official records.  Consequently, 
when  applying for a correction of  an  official naval  record,  the burden  is on  the applicant to 
demonstrate the existence of  probable material error or  injustice. 

Sincerely, 

Enclosure 

DEPARTMENT O F  THE NAVY 

NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND 

5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE 

MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000 

1160 
Ser 811/451 
26 Sep 2003 

MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD 

Via : 

PERS-OOZCB 

Subj :  BCNR PETITION ICO 

Ref: 

(a) SNM'S DDForm149 dtd22 Jul03 
(b) NAVADMIN 032/02 

Encl:  (1) BCNR File 

1.  In response to reference (a), recommend disapproval to the 
petitioner's request. 

2.  The petitioner reenlisted on 22 March 2002 for six years and 
received a zone 'C"  SRB entitlement for the AT(0000) rate.  Reference 
(b) released on 11 February 2002 implemented the Location Selective 
Reenlistment Bonus  (LSRB) for eligible members at designated locations. 

3.  The petitioner's command location at the time of reenlistment was 
COMSTRKFIGHTWINGPAC DET AIMD LEMOORE CA  (UIC 44321).  Reference  (b) 
listed the UIC 44321 as a LSRB eligible command. 

4.  The petitioner requests to receive the additional award level for 
the LSRB UIC 44321.  Per reference (b), for a member currently serving 
in a qualifying activity identified by the UIC, they must have a minimum 
of 24 months remaining on the prescribed tour of duty at the time the 
LSRB is awarded and the reenlistment contract is signed.  The 
petitioner's PRD at the time of reenlistment was November 2003.  The 
petitioner is not eligible to receive the LSRB entitlement. 

5.  In view of the above, recommend the petitioner's record remain as 
is. 

6.  This is an advisory memorandum to reference  (a) for' the use by  the 
Board  for  correction of  Naval  Records  (BCNR) only.  Enclosure  (1) is 
returned. 

MMc  (ssj-bs~ 
Reenlistment Incentives Branch 



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08622-02

    Original file (08622-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Consequently, on of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to probable material error or injustice. The petitione requests to receive the LSRB for the Command/OPNAV cannot provide information c) prior to the reenlistment. recommend the petitioner's record remain as This is an adviso 3. by the Board for Corr memorandum to reference (a) for use tion of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08976-02

    Original file (08976-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. In petitioner's request. response to reference (a), recommend disapproval of the ‘B" SRB entitlement for the The petitioner reenlisted on 05 May 2002 for six years and 2. received a zone petitioner's EAOS at the time was 04 August 2002. reenlisted prior to transfer to NAVSUPPACT SOUDA BAY GR UIC Reference Location Selective...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08063-02

    Original file (08063-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 December 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Reference (c) listed NAVHOSP GREAT The petitioner requests to receive the LSRB for the reenlistment...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07925-02

    Original file (07925-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 December 2002. The petitioner requests to receive the LSRB for the reenlistment of 29 January 2002. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use 3. by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 01000-05

    Original file (01000-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo 1160 Ser 4811/079 of 2 Feb 06, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 06780-07

    Original file (06780-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo 1160 Ser 811/445 dtd 14 Sep 07, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03693-02

    Original file (03693-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Reference (b) released 11 February 2002 implemented the Location Selective Reenlistment Bonus (LSRB) for service members that receive orders to designated locations. The petitioner requests to change the date of reenlistment from 08 February 2002 to 11 February and receive the LSRB offered in reference (b).

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05127-03

    Original file (05127-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The petitioner was selected to the STA-21 officer program in October 2001. The petitioner requests to receive SRB offered in reference (b) based on the reenlistment of 19 July 2002.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05886-02

    Original file (05886-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1160 Ser 81 is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The petitioner reenlisted on 27 February 2002 for two The petitioner signed a NAVPERS years.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05675-03

    Original file (05675-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by the Board for correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.