DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
MEH: ddj
Docket No: 8976-02
22 January 2003
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 22 January 2003.
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1160 Ser 81
which is attached.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
l/529 of 20 December 2002, a copy of
Your allegations of error and injustice
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
In this regard, it is important
Consequently,
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND
5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000
1160
Ser
20
811/529
Dee 2002
MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN,
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
Via:
PERS-OOZCB
Subj:
BCNR PETITION ICO
Ref:
(a)
(b)
(cl
SNM's DD Form 149 dtd 24 Sep 02
NAVADMIN
NAVADMIN
032/02
301/02
Encl:
(1) BCNR File
1. In
petitioner's request.
response to reference (a), recommend disapproval of the
‘B" SRB entitlement for the
The petitioner reenlisted on 05 May 2002 for six years and
2.
received a zone
petitioner's EAOS at the time was 04 August 2002.
reenlisted prior to transfer to NAVSUPPACT SOUDA BAY GR UIC
Reference
Location Selective Reenlistment Bonus (LSRB) award level list at the
time the member reenlisted.
(b) did not list NAVSUPPACT SOUDA BAY GR UIC 46127 on the
The petitioner
MA(OOO0).
46127.
The
Reference
3.
of 01 October 2002 added NAVSUPPACT SOUDA BAY GR UIC 46127 to the LSRB
award level list.
(c), released on 28 August 2002 with an effective date
The petitioner requests to receive the LSRB entitlement offered in
4.
reference
(c).
Navy Personnel Command/OPNAV cannot provide information pertaining
5.
to subsequent SRB
released.
concerning reference
The petitioner's
hindsight is not sufficient grounds to receive the LSRB entitlement as
no error or injustice was committed.
Therefore the petitioner could not have been counseled
NAVADMIN's until after the NAVADMIN has been
(c) prior to the reenlistment.
In view of the above,
recommend the petitioner's record remain as
6.
is.
Subj:
BCNR PETITION ICO
This is an advisory memorandum to reference
7.
by the Board for Correction of Naval Records
Enclosure
(1) is returned.
(a) for use
(BCNR) only.
Reenlistment Incentives Branch
2
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08063-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 December 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Reference (c) listed NAVHOSP GREAT The petitioner requests to receive the LSRB for the reenlistment...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07925-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 December 2002. The petitioner requests to receive the LSRB for the reenlistment of 29 January 2002. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use 3. by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 06780-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo 1160 Ser 811/445 dtd 14 Sep 07, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 06337-03
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The petitioner requests to receive the additional award level for the LSRB UIC 44321. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for' the use by the Board for correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08622-02
Consequently, on of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to probable material error or injustice. The petitione requests to receive the LSRB for the Command/OPNAV cannot provide information c) prior to the reenlistment. recommend the petitioner's record remain as This is an adviso 3. by the Board for Corr memorandum to reference (a) for use tion of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03693-02
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Reference (b) released 11 February 2002 implemented the Location Selective Reenlistment Bonus (LSRB) for service members that receive orders to designated locations. The petitioner requests to change the date of reenlistment from 08 February 2002 to 11 February and receive the LSRB offered in reference (b).
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05886-02
opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1160 Ser 81 is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The petitioner reenlisted on 27 February 2002 for two The petitioner signed a NAVPERS years.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 07476-04
7476-04 15 March 2005From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the NavySubj:REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORDRef: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the MA rating; and a zone “A” Location Selective Reenlistment Bonus...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 04235-04
The Board, consisting of Mr. Geisler, Mr. Nicholson, and Ms. Gilbert reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 27 July 2004 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the avialable evidence of record. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner’s application has commented to the effect that the request has merit and warrants...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 01000-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo 1160 Ser 4811/079 of 2 Feb 06, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish...