Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 01000-05
Original file (01000-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100


 MEH
 Docket No. 1000-05
22 February 2006





This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 Usc 1552.
A three—member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 February 2006. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo 1160 Ser 4811/079 of 2 Feb 06, a copy of which is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is also important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.


Sincerely,



                                                               W. DEAN PFEIFFER
          Executive Director



Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND
5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
                                                      MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000

                                             1160
                                                                                                    Ser 4811/079
                                                                                                  02 Feb 2006
MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
 Via:     PERS-3lc
Subj:
Ref:     (a) SNN’S DD Form 149 dtd 29 Nov 05
 (b)      NAVADMIN 301/02
End:     (1) BCNR File
1. In response to reference (a), recommend disapproval to the petitioner’s request.
2. The petitioner discharged from Navy on 22 April 2005 after six years four months and 15 days of active service. The petitioner NAVET reenlisted on 05 September 2005 for four years. The petitioner received orders to TSC GREAT LAKES (UIC 0580A).
3. Reference (b) provided a zone “B” LSRB entitlement for service members with PCS transfer orders to UIC 0580A. The petitioner requests to receive the LSRB for the reenlistment of 05 September 2005. Reference (b) was a program provided to give a monetary incentive to service members who receive orders to designated locations/activities. Members were offered a LSRB entitlement who will transfer from one location to a LSRB eligible location. Reference (b) was not offered as an incentive to service members who reenlist after a 24 hours or more break in service.
4. In view of the above recommend the petitioner’s record remain as
is.
5. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by the Board for correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only. Enclosure (1) is returned.



MNC(SS) USN
 Reenlistment Incentives Branch

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09543-06

    Original file (09543-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo 1160 Ser 4811/731 dtd 18 Dec 06, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 06780-07

    Original file (06780-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo 1160 Ser 811/445 dtd 14 Sep 07, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08063-02

    Original file (08063-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 December 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Reference (c) listed NAVHOSP GREAT The petitioner requests to receive the LSRB for the reenlistment...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08976-02

    Original file (08976-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. In petitioner's request. response to reference (a), recommend disapproval of the ‘B" SRB entitlement for the The petitioner reenlisted on 05 May 2002 for six years and 2. received a zone petitioner's EAOS at the time was 04 August 2002. reenlisted prior to transfer to NAVSUPPACT SOUDA BAY GR UIC Reference Location Selective...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 06337-03

    Original file (06337-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The petitioner requests to receive the additional award level for the LSRB UIC 44321. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for' the use by the Board for correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07925-02

    Original file (07925-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 December 2002. The petitioner requests to receive the LSRB for the reenlistment of 29 January 2002. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use 3. by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00040-06

    Original file (00040-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS2 NAVY ANNEXWASHINGTON DC 20370-5100MEHDocket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “C” Location Selective Reenlistment Bonus (LSRB) for UIC 0763A.2 The Board consisting of reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 28...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08622-02

    Original file (08622-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Consequently, on of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to probable material error or injustice. The petitione requests to receive the LSRB for the Command/OPNAV cannot provide information c) prior to the reenlistment. recommend the petitioner's record remain as This is an adviso 3. by the Board for Corr memorandum to reference (a) for use tion of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 05336-05

    Original file (05336-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    5336-05 20 September 2005From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the NavySubj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICORef: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Location Selective Reenlistment Bonus (LSRB) for UIC 0763A.2. The Board, consisting of Messrs....

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05886-02

    Original file (05886-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1160 Ser 81 is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The petitioner reenlisted on 27 February 2002 for two The petitioner signed a NAVPERS years.