DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2
NAVY
ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
h4EH:mh
Docket No:
9 July 2002
3693-02
This is in reference to your
provisions of title 10 of the
applicatiotl
IJnited States Code, section
for correction
1552.
01‘ your naval record pursuant to the
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application
were reviewed in accordance with
proceedings of this
application, together
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
inemorandum
opinion furnished by
attached.
on 9 July 2002. Your allegations of error and injustice
adniinistrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
Doculnentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
Roarcl.
Mith all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
Ser 8 1
Jun 2002, a copy of which is
l/202 of 12
1 160
NPC
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will
be furnished
upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
such that favorable action cannot be taken.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
DERARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND
INTEDRITY
YILLIWDTOW TN 3805
5720
DRIVL
5-0000
116 0
Ser
12 Jun 2002
811/
&31
MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
Via:
PERS-OOZCB
Subj:
BCNR PETITION ICO
Ref:
SNM's DD Form 149 dtd 27 Mar 02
(a)
(b) NAVADMIN
032/02
Encl:
(1) BCNR File
In response to reference (a),
1.
petitioner's request.
recommend disapproval of the
a.
The petitioner reenlisted
years to continue active service.
orders to Recruit Training Command
0763A).
on 08 February 2002 for five
The petitioner currently has
(RTC) Great Lakes, IL (UIC
b.
Reference
(b) released 11
February 2002 implemented the
Location Selective Reenlistment Bonus (LSRB) for service members
that receive orders to designated locations.
listed UIC
0763A as an eligible LSRB designation.
Reference (b)
C .
The petitioner requests to change the date of
reenlistment from 08 February 2002 to 11 February and receive the
LSRB offered in reference (b).
d.
Navy Personnel Command/OPNAV cannot provide information
NAVADMIN's until after the NAVADMIN
Therefore, the petitioner could not have been
pertaining to subsequent SRB
has been released.
counseled concerning reference (c) prior to the reenlistment.
The petitioner's hindsight is not sufficient grounds to change
the reenlistment as no error or injustice was committed.
In view of
the- above, recommend the member's record remain as
2 .
is.
This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by
3.
the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
(1) is returned.
Enclosure
MMC(SS) USN
Reenlistment Incentives Branch
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09543-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo 1160 Ser 4811/731 dtd 18 Dec 06, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08063-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 December 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Reference (c) listed NAVHOSP GREAT The petitioner requests to receive the LSRB for the reenlistment...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07925-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 December 2002. The petitioner requests to receive the LSRB for the reenlistment of 29 January 2002. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use 3. by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08976-02
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. In petitioner's request. response to reference (a), recommend disapproval of the ‘B" SRB entitlement for the The petitioner reenlisted on 05 May 2002 for six years and 2. received a zone petitioner's EAOS at the time was 04 August 2002. reenlisted prior to transfer to NAVSUPPACT SOUDA BAY GR UIC Reference Location Selective...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05886-02
opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1160 Ser 81 is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The petitioner reenlisted on 27 February 2002 for two The petitioner signed a NAVPERS years.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08622-02
Consequently, on of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to probable material error or injustice. The petitione requests to receive the LSRB for the Command/OPNAV cannot provide information c) prior to the reenlistment. recommend the petitioner's record remain as This is an adviso 3. by the Board for Corr memorandum to reference (a) for use tion of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 06337-03
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The petitioner requests to receive the additional award level for the LSRB UIC 44321. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for' the use by the Board for correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 01000-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo 1160 Ser 4811/079 of 2 Feb 06, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 06780-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo 1160 Ser 811/445 dtd 14 Sep 07, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04610-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected show she reenlisted vice extended, and to establish entitlement to a zone “A 1 ’ Location Selective Reenlistment Bonus (LSRB).2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Koman, and Ms. Gilbert, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 6 Septe~er 2006 and, pursuant to its...