DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
IOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2
NAVY
ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
MEH : ddj
Docket No: 8622-02
17 December 2002
This is in reference to your
provisions of title 10 of the
application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
United States Code, section 1552.
tl
A three-member panel of
session, considered your ap
injustice were reviewed in
;
to the proceedings of this
E
your application, together
v
applicable statutes, regulatic
opinion furnished by NPC
:
which is attached.
: Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
blication on 17 December 2002. Your allegations of error and
zcordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable
bard. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
ith all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
ns and policies.
memorandum 1160 Ser 8 1
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
l/462 of 14 November 2002, a copy of
conscientj
After careful and
evidence submitted was ins
connectio:
injustice. In this
the advisory opinion.
Accc
the members of the panel
P
bus consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
fficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
.dingly , your application has been denied. The names and votes of
11 be furnished upon request.
circu
It is regretted that the
You are entitled to have
the
evidence or other matter nc
to keep in mind that a
press
when applying for a
correc
demonstrate the existence o
nstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
mption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently,
on of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
probable material error or injustice.
I
Sincerely,
Enclosure
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
i
iPARl=MENT OF THE
NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND
MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000
5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
NAV:
1160
Ser
14 Nov 2002
811/462
JQQJORANDUJ?l FOR CHAIRMAN, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
Via:
PERS-OOZCB
Subj:
BCNR PETITION
CO
Ref:
(a)
SNM's DD F
149 dtd 27 Sep 02
Encl:
(1) BCNR File
In response to re
1.
petitioner's request.
recommend disapproval to the
a.
The petitione
m
and received a zone
in reference
(b).
(UIC 44321).
Reference
(
(c),
reference
SRB award level
designated
loca
COMSTRKFIGHTWIN
LSRB entitlement.
reenlisted on 01 February 2002 for six years
n SRB entitlement for the
AM(OOO0) rate offered
reenlisted to have sufficient
STRKFIGHTWINGPAC DET AIMD LEMOORE CA
(LSRB) pilot program.
11 February 2002 implemented the
onus
urpose was to provide an additional
at are eligible and receive orders to
Reference
ORE CA
(UIC 44321 AM rate) on the
(c) listed
Per
C .
The petitione
requests to receive the LSRB for the
Command/OPNAV cannot provide information
c) prior to the reenlistment.
DMIN's until after the NAVADMIN has
itioner could not have been counseled
The petitioner's
ds to receive the LSRB or change the
d.
Navy Personne
pertaining to s
been released.
concerning reference
hindsight is no
date of reenlistment
s no error or injustice was committed.
is.
recommend the petitioner's record remain as
This is an adviso
3.
by the Board for Corr
memorandum to reference (a) for use
tion of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
Subj:
BCNR PETITION
(SS)
MMC
Reenlistment Incentives Branch
USN
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08063-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 December 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Reference (c) listed NAVHOSP GREAT The petitioner requests to receive the LSRB for the reenlistment...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 06337-03
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The petitioner requests to receive the additional award level for the LSRB UIC 44321. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for' the use by the Board for correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08976-02
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. In petitioner's request. response to reference (a), recommend disapproval of the ‘B" SRB entitlement for the The petitioner reenlisted on 05 May 2002 for six years and 2. received a zone petitioner's EAOS at the time was 04 August 2002. reenlisted prior to transfer to NAVSUPPACT SOUDA BAY GR UIC Reference Location Selective...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07925-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 December 2002. The petitioner requests to receive the LSRB for the reenlistment of 29 January 2002. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use 3. by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 06780-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo 1160 Ser 811/445 dtd 14 Sep 07, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03693-02
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Reference (b) released 11 February 2002 implemented the Location Selective Reenlistment Bonus (LSRB) for service members that receive orders to designated locations. The petitioner requests to change the date of reenlistment from 08 February 2002 to 11 February and receive the LSRB offered in reference (b).
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05886-02
opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1160 Ser 81 is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The petitioner reenlisted on 27 February 2002 for two The petitioner signed a NAVPERS years.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 05336-05
5336-05 20 September 2005From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the NavySubj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICORef: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Location Selective Reenlistment Bonus (LSRB) for UIC 0763A.2. The Board, consisting of Messrs....
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 01000-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo 1160 Ser 4811/079 of 2 Feb 06, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09543-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo 1160 Ser 4811/731 dtd 18 Dec 06, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence...