DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
MEH:ddj
Docket No: 5886-02
17 September 2002
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title
10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
on. 17 September 2002. Your allegations of error and
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable
to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1160 Ser 81
is attached.
l/370 of 29 August 2002, a copy of which
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Consequently,
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE
NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND
5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
MILLINGTON TN 3805.50000
NAV Y
116 0
Ser
29 Aug 2002
811/37O
MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
Via:
PERS-OOZCB
Subj:
BCNR PETITION ICO
Ref:
SNM's DD Form 149 dtd 20 Jun 02
(a)
(b) NAVADMIN
032/02
Encl:
(1) BCNR File
In response to reference (a),
1.
petitioner's request.
recommend disapproval of the
a.
The petitioner reenlisted on 27 February 2002 for two
The petitioner signed a NAVPERS
years.
months on 09 March 2002 to accept BUPERS order 3341 to
NAVCRUITRACOM GREAT LAKES, IL (UIC 41455).
1070/621 extension for 18
b.
Reference (b) released 11 February 2002 implemented the
Location Selective Reenlistment Bonus (LSRB) for service members
that receive orders to designated locations.
listed five
41455 was not listed.
UIC's for the GREAT LAKES command, unfortunately UIC
Reference (b)
C .
The petitioner's Enlisted Master File (EMF) indicates
that his gaining command is under UIC 41455.
In view of the above,
recommend the member's record remain
as
2.
is.
This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by
3.
the Board for Correction of Naval Records
(1) is returned.
(BCNR)
only.
Enclosure
Reenlistment Incentives Branch
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08063-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 December 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Reference (c) listed NAVHOSP GREAT The petitioner requests to receive the LSRB for the reenlistment...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03693-02
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Reference (b) released 11 February 2002 implemented the Location Selective Reenlistment Bonus (LSRB) for service members that receive orders to designated locations. The petitioner requests to change the date of reenlistment from 08 February 2002 to 11 February and receive the LSRB offered in reference (b).
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 01000-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo 1160 Ser 4811/079 of 2 Feb 06, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 06337-03
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The petitioner requests to receive the additional award level for the LSRB UIC 44321. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for' the use by the Board for correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08976-02
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. In petitioner's request. response to reference (a), recommend disapproval of the ‘B" SRB entitlement for the The petitioner reenlisted on 05 May 2002 for six years and 2. received a zone petitioner's EAOS at the time was 04 August 2002. reenlisted prior to transfer to NAVSUPPACT SOUDA BAY GR UIC Reference Location Selective...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07925-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 December 2002. The petitioner requests to receive the LSRB for the reenlistment of 29 January 2002. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use 3. by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01272-01
opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum of 1160 PERS 815 of 13 June 2001, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The petitioner was attached on board UIC 62229. b.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08622-02
Consequently, on of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to probable material error or injustice. The petitione requests to receive the LSRB for the Command/OPNAV cannot provide information c) prior to the reenlistment. recommend the petitioner's record remain as This is an adviso 3. by the Board for Corr memorandum to reference (a) for use tion of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05594-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 Ser of which is attached. appropriate housing allowance in these circumstances.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 06780-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo 1160 Ser 811/445 dtd 14 Sep 07, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence...