Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 04365-03
Original file (04365-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE  NAVY 

BOARD  FOR  CORRECTION  OF  NAVAL  RECORDS 

2  N A V Y A N N E X  

WASHINGTON  D C   2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0  

LCC:ecb 
Docket No:  4365-03 
5 August 2003 

This is in  reference to your application for correction of  your  naval record pursuant to the 
provisions of  title 10 of  the United  States Code, section  1552. 

A three-member panel of  the Board  for Correction of  Naval  Records, sitting in  executive session, 
considered your application on 5 August 2003.  Your  allegations of  error and injustice were 
reviewed in  accordance with  administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the 
proceedings of  this Board.  Documentary material considered by  the Board  consisted of  your 
application, together  with all material  submitted in  support thereof, your  naval record and 
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.  In  addition, the Board considered the advisory 
opinion furnished by  NPC  memorandum  1430 Ser 81 1A 11352 dated  17 July 2003, a copy of 
which  is attached. 

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board  found  that the 
evidence submitted was  insufficient to establish the existence of  probable material error or 
injustice.  In  this connection, the Board  substantially concurred with  the comments contained in 
the advisory opinion.  Accordingly, your applialiorl has b w l  denied.  The names and votes of 
the members of  the panel  will be furnished upon  request. 

It is regretted that the circumstances of  your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken. 
You  are entitled to have the Board  reconsider its decision  upon  submission of  new  and  material 
evidence or other matter not previously considered by  the Board.  In  this regard, it is important 
to keep in  mind  that a presumption of  regularity attaches to all official records.  Consequently, 
when  applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on  the applicant to 
demonstrate the existence of  probable material error or injustice. 

Sincerely, 

Enclosure 

DIPARTMEIYT  OF rna nAw 

w m  rarorrrr couurm 

5720 I l T l a W T 1  DRIVE 
 a8Ol S-00 

Y I L L I I 8 T O I  T I

1430 
Ser 811~1/352. 
17 Jul 03 

- 

MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL 

RECORDS  ( BCNR) 

Via:  Assistant for BCNR Matters  (PERS-OOZCB) 

Subj:  COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN THE CASE OF 

- 

Ref: 

(a) BUPERSINSY l430.16E 

Encl : 

(1) BCNR file #04365-03 

1.  Based on policy and guidelines established in reference (a), 
enclosure (1) is returned recommending disapproval. 

2. 
rec 

was discharged 19 August 1989, upon reviewing his 
is no indication of a pending advancement. 

3.  Unfortunately, an approval recommendation cannot be granted 
regarding this petition. 

By direction 



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05720-03

    Original file (05720-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 October 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05431-03

    Original file (05431-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 October 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05825-03

    Original file (05825-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. is requesting to be advanced to HM2 due 2. to an administrative error in processing his award points.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 04568-03

    Original file (04568-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Sincerely, hv Executive Director Enclosure DIPARIMBWT OF TI41 NAVY 1430 Ser 8llAl/ 351 17 Jul 03 MEMORANDUM FOR...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10603-02

    Original file (10603-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 June 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 03834-03

    Original file (03834-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 August 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09593-02

    Original file (09593-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 May 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05106-03

    Original file (05106-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 October 2003. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 Ser N130C3103U0637 dated 5 September 2003, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05081-03

    Original file (05081-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. A review of enclosure (1) revealed that the petitioner was E-4 (frock to Second Class Petty Officer) for pay purposes...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05999-03

    Original file (05999-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 October 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. IAW reference (a) Secretary of defense determines BAH type I rates and locations for all members in a Military Housing Area (MHA) based on the...