Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00177-03
Original file (00177-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT  OF THE  NAVY 

BOARD  FOR  C O R R E C T I O N   O F   N A V A L R E C O R D S  

2  NAVY  ANNEX 

W A S H I N G T O N   D C   2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0  

MEH:ddj 
Docket No:  177-03 
15 April 2003 

This is in  reference to your application for correction of your naval  record pursuant to the 
provisions of title  10 of  the United  States Code, section  1552. 

A three-member panel  of  the Board  for Correction of  Naval  Records,  sitting in  executive 
session, considered your application on  15 April 2003.  Your allegations of  error and  injustice 
were reviewed  in  accordance with  administrative regulations and  procedures applicable to the 
proceedings of  this Board.  Documentary  material considered by  the Board  consisted of  your 
application, together with  all material submitted in  support thereof, your naval  record and 
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.  In  addition, the Board  considered the advisory 
opinion furnished by  NPC  memorandum  1 160 Ser 8 1 111 76 of  27 March  2003, a copy of  which 
is attached. 

After careful and  conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board  found that the 
evidence submitted was  insufficient to establish the existence of  probable material error or 
injustice.  When  you  reenlisted on  21 May  2002 you  were a CTM  and  your Selective 
Reenlistment Bonus was paid  accordingly.  On  21 August  2002 your security clearance was 
revoked  and  you  were subsequently converted to the MS  rating.  There are no provisions that 
allow for changing your reenlistment of  21 August 2002 to reflect the MS  rating.  The 
reenlistment is correct as it stands and  there is no error for the Board  to correct.  In  this 
connection, the Board  disagreed with  the comments contained in  the advisory opinion. 
Accordingly,  your application has been  denied.  The names and  votes of  the members of  the 
panel  will be furnished upon  request. 

It is regretted  that  the circumstances of your case are such  that favorable action cannot be taken. 
You  are entitled to have the Board  reconsider its decision  upon  submission of  new  and  material 
evidence or other  matter not previously considered by  the Board. 

Docket No.  177-03 

In  this regard, it is important to keep in  mind  that a presumption  of  regularity  attaches to all 
official records.  Consequently, when  applying for a correction of  an  official naval record,  the 
burden  is on  the applicant to demonstrate the existence of  probable material error or injustice. 

Sincerely, 

W.  DEAN PFEIFFER 
Executive Director 

Enclosure 

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY 

NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND 

5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE 

MILLINGTON T N  38055-0000 

1160 
Ser 811/176 
27 Mar 2003 

MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 

Via : 

PERS-OOZCB 

Subj:  BCNR PETITION ICO 

Ref: 

(a) SNM's DDForm149 d t d 2 1 O c t  02 
(b) NAVADMIN 049/01 
(c) NAVADMIN 097/02 
(d) Director, Department of the Navy Central Adjudication 

Facility(D0NCAF) dtd 09 Aug 2002 

Encl:  (1) BCNR File 

1.  In response to reference (a), recommend adjustment to the 
petitioner's zone "B" SRB entitlement. 

2.  The petitioner received conversion approval from the MS rate to 
the CTM rate via the SCORE program on 19 July 2001.  The petitioner 
reenlisted on 21 May 2002 for six years after completion of the CTM 
"A" school training and received a zone 'B"  SRB entitlement.  The 
petitioner's EAOS at the time was 28 July 2002. 

3.  Reference  (b) listed the zone 'B"  SRB entitlement for the CTM rate 
at the 1.5 award level.  The petitioner's SCORE conversion approval 
date locked in the 1.5 award level in reference (b) and supersedes the 
reference (c) which was in effect at the time of reenlistment. 

4.  Per reference (d), the petitioner's  access to classified material 
was terminated.  This termination caused the petitioner to convert 
back to his original rating of MS.  The petitioner requests to adjust 
his zone "B" SRB entitlement to reflect the MS rate at the award level 
of 1.0 offered in reference (c). 

5.  In view of the above, recommend the petitioner's six year SRB 
entitlement of 21 May 2002 be changed to reflect the MS(0000) rate at 
the award level of 1.0 vice the CTM(0000) rate at the 1.5 award level. 
This change will recoup the SRB overpayment for the CTM(0000) rate and 
adjust to MS rate entitlement. 

6.  This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use 
by the Board for Correction of Naval Records  (BCNR) only. 
Enclosure  (1) is returned. 

Subj:  BCNR  P E T I T I O N   I C O  

MMC (SS)  USN 
Reenlistment  Incentives Branch 

I 



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03265-02

    Original file (03265-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 MEH:mh Docket No: 9 July 2002 326542 This is in reference to provisions of title 10 of the lJnited States ( ‘ode. section 01‘ your 1552. your application for correction naval record pursuant to the (lorrcction of Naval Bo;ml al~l~lication for Kecords, sitting in executive 011 9 July 2002. Your allegations of error and injustice A three-member panel of the session, considered...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03422-99

    Original file (03422-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 August 1999. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by BUPERS Memorandum 1160 is attached. - Petitioner requests to expunge reenlistment date of 07 Dec 96 and effect a 7 month extension to his P3D of July 1997.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03370-99

    Original file (03370-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material consider by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support t ereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Reference b) did not carry a zone "C" SRB entitlement for the AT(0000) ate at the time petitioner reenlisted. - Petitioner requests to expunge reenl stment date of 06 Mar 98 and effect a reenlistment on 01 May 99 nd receive the zone "A" SRB entitlement in reference (c) .

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 06334-03

    Original file (06334-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The petitioner requests to have the SRB payment readjusted to reflect the 4.0 award level for the Diver NEC 5342.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 06337-03

    Original file (06337-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The petitioner requests to receive the additional award level for the LSRB UIC 44321. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for' the use by the Board for correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05127-03

    Original file (05127-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The petitioner was selected to the STA-21 officer program in October 2001. The petitioner requests to receive SRB offered in reference (b) based on the reenlistment of 19 July 2002.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05024-01

    Original file (05024-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. 2001. reference The petitioner graduated from HM "C" school on 18 April At the time the petitioner negotiated and received...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05675-03

    Original file (05675-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by the Board for correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03289-99

    Original file (03289-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 August 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. - Petitioner requests to expunge the reenlistment date of 14 Apr 1999 to effect a reenlistment within the SRB eligible window of reference (c) and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03281-99

    Original file (03281-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BUREAU OF NAVAL PERSONNEL, 5 7 2 0 INTEGRITY DRIVE MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000 IN R E P L Y R E F E R TO 1160 PERS-815 26 Jul 99 MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN, BOARD FOR CORRECT ON OF NAVAL RECORDS Via: PERS-OOZCB Ref: (a)...