DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR C O R R E C T I O N O F N A V A L R E C O R D S
2 NAVY ANNEX
W A S H I N G T O N D C 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0
MEH:ddj
Docket No: 177-03
15 April 2003
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 15 April 2003. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory
opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1 160 Ser 8 1 111 76 of 27 March 2003, a copy of which
is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. When you reenlisted on 21 May 2002 you were a CTM and your Selective
Reenlistment Bonus was paid accordingly. On 21 August 2002 your security clearance was
revoked and you were subsequently converted to the MS rating. There are no provisions that
allow for changing your reenlistment of 21 August 2002 to reflect the MS rating. The
reenlistment is correct as it stands and there is no error for the Board to correct. In this
connection, the Board disagreed with the comments contained in the advisory opinion.
Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the
panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
Docket No. 177-03
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all
official records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the
burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND
5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
MILLINGTON T N 38055-0000
1160
Ser 811/176
27 Mar 2003
MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
Via :
PERS-OOZCB
Subj: BCNR PETITION ICO
Ref:
(a) SNM's DDForm149 d t d 2 1 O c t 02
(b) NAVADMIN 049/01
(c) NAVADMIN 097/02
(d) Director, Department of the Navy Central Adjudication
Facility(D0NCAF) dtd 09 Aug 2002
Encl: (1) BCNR File
1. In response to reference (a), recommend adjustment to the
petitioner's zone "B" SRB entitlement.
2. The petitioner received conversion approval from the MS rate to
the CTM rate via the SCORE program on 19 July 2001. The petitioner
reenlisted on 21 May 2002 for six years after completion of the CTM
"A" school training and received a zone 'B" SRB entitlement. The
petitioner's EAOS at the time was 28 July 2002.
3. Reference (b) listed the zone 'B" SRB entitlement for the CTM rate
at the 1.5 award level. The petitioner's SCORE conversion approval
date locked in the 1.5 award level in reference (b) and supersedes the
reference (c) which was in effect at the time of reenlistment.
4. Per reference (d), the petitioner's access to classified material
was terminated. This termination caused the petitioner to convert
back to his original rating of MS. The petitioner requests to adjust
his zone "B" SRB entitlement to reflect the MS rate at the award level
of 1.0 offered in reference (c).
5. In view of the above, recommend the petitioner's six year SRB
entitlement of 21 May 2002 be changed to reflect the MS(0000) rate at
the award level of 1.0 vice the CTM(0000) rate at the 1.5 award level.
This change will recoup the SRB overpayment for the CTM(0000) rate and
adjust to MS rate entitlement.
6. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use
by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
Enclosure (1) is returned.
Subj: BCNR P E T I T I O N I C O
MMC (SS) USN
Reenlistment Incentives Branch
I
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03265-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 MEH:mh Docket No: 9 July 2002 326542 This is in reference to provisions of title 10 of the lJnited States ( ‘ode. section 01‘ your 1552. your application for correction naval record pursuant to the (lorrcction of Naval Bo;ml al~l~lication for Kecords, sitting in executive 011 9 July 2002. Your allegations of error and injustice A three-member panel of the session, considered...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03422-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 August 1999. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by BUPERS Memorandum 1160 is attached. - Petitioner requests to expunge reenlistment date of 07 Dec 96 and effect a 7 month extension to his P3D of July 1997.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03370-99
Documentary material consider by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support t ereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Reference b) did not carry a zone "C" SRB entitlement for the AT(0000) ate at the time petitioner reenlisted. - Petitioner requests to expunge reenl stment date of 06 Mar 98 and effect a reenlistment on 01 May 99 nd receive the zone "A" SRB entitlement in reference (c) .
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 06334-03
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The petitioner requests to have the SRB payment readjusted to reflect the 4.0 award level for the Diver NEC 5342.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 06337-03
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The petitioner requests to receive the additional award level for the LSRB UIC 44321. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for' the use by the Board for correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05127-03
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The petitioner was selected to the STA-21 officer program in October 2001. The petitioner requests to receive SRB offered in reference (b) based on the reenlistment of 19 July 2002.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05024-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. 2001. reference The petitioner graduated from HM "C" school on 18 April At the time the petitioner negotiated and received...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05675-03
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by the Board for correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03289-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 August 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. - Petitioner requests to expunge the reenlistment date of 14 Apr 1999 to effect a reenlistment within the SRB eligible window of reference (c) and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03281-99
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BUREAU OF NAVAL PERSONNEL, 5 7 2 0 INTEGRITY DRIVE MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000 IN R E P L Y R E F E R TO 1160 PERS-815 26 Jul 99 MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN, BOARD FOR CORRECT ON OF NAVAL RECORDS Via: PERS-OOZCB Ref: (a)...