DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
B O A R D F O R C O R R E C T I O N OF N A V A L R E C O R D S
2 N A V Y A N N E X
W A S H I N G T O N DC 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0
LCCl:NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 03834-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 August 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06557-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 August 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The FMS required for advancement to MS2 for that cycle was 181.58. in the March 1994 (Cycle 143) Navywide 3.-was credited with 4 award points for Cycle 143.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 04568-03
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Sincerely, hv Executive Director Enclosure DIPARIMBWT OF TI41 NAVY 1430 Ser 8llAl/ 351 17 Jul 03 MEMORANDUM FOR...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00997-02
The Board, consisting of Messrs. Mackey, Pauling, and Ms. McCorniick, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 9 April 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations. CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an i~ijustice warranting the following corrective action. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05431-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 October 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 08627-98
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with ;ill material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. If a member is denied an opportunity to participate in a Navywide examination and if selected for advancement through participation in a subsequent examination, a member may request a backdated advancement. Therefore, no relief is recommended in this case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07776-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 July 2003. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 10 February ahd 3 March 2003, the Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Personnel Programs) letter dated 21 June 2002, Subject: Complaint of Wrongs under Article 138, UCMJ (Uniform Code of Military Justice), and the memorandum for the record dated...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05825-03
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. is requesting to be advanced to HM2 due 2. to an administrative error in processing his award points.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05077-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 July 2003. Your Final Multiple Score (FMS) of 144.06 minus .25 for the additional 6 months time in rate would give you a FMS of 143.81 to be applied to the September 2002 Exam for consideration for advancement. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08708-01
A three-n~ember panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application o n 14 May 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereol', your naval record arid applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...