Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00167-02
Original file (00167-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

LCC:ddj
Docket No: 167-02
14 May 2002

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title  

IJnited States Code. section  

10 of the  

1552.

on 14 May 2002. Your allegations of error and injustice were

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session,
considered your application  
reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 Ser N  
which is attached.

III addition, the Board considered the advisory

13OC3/021J 104 of 8 March 2002, a copy of

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, 
your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished

upon request. 

 

-

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
ofticial naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
when applying for a correction of an  
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

In this regard, it is important

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE   NAV 

OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF  NAVAL OPERATIONS

h

2000  NAVY PENTAGON

WASHINGTON. D.C. 20350-2000

IN REPLY REFER TO

N130C3/ 

02UO104

7220
Ser 
8 Mar 2002

MEMORANDUM 

FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTIONS

OF NAVAL, RECORDS

via:

Assistant for BCNR Matters, Pers-OOXCB

Subj:

REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ICO

Ref:

Encl:

(a) DODFMR Volume  
230/01
(b) NAVADMIN 

(1) BCNR Case File  

Record

7A, Chapter   26, Sep 00

#00167-02 w/Microfiche Service

1. Per your request,
enclosure (1) is provided.

the following recommendation concerning

2. Enclosure (1) indicates a request for retroactive payment of
Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) at the w/dependent rate for
vice his Permanent Duty
Marysville,
Ott 2001.
Stations (PDS) from 8 Nov 2000 to 1  

WA (dependent location)

3. A review of the petitioner's Master Military Pay Account (MMPA)
revealed that he reported PCS to Naval Intermediate Maintenance
IAW
Facility,
reference (a) BAH entitlement is based on the members Permanent
Duty Station (PDS).

Pacific Northwest, Bangor, WA on 30  

2000.

Ott 

4. IAW reference (b), BAH is authorized at their old PDS when
reassigned within the United States is under NO COST/CLOSE
PROXIMITY PCS moves.
inequities in entitlement rules
with different BAH rates.
homeport location Everett, WA.
ABRAHAM LINCOLN (CVN-72)  
and new PDS is not considered in proximity to each other.

These changes are designed to correct

The petitioner's old PDS was USS

involving adjacent housing areas

The old

Subj:

N130C recommends disapproval of the petitioner's request for

5.
retroactive payment of BAH at dependents location.

Assistant Head, Pay and
Allowances Section  

(N130C)



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07662-00

    Original file (07662-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 March 2001. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. for a member who executes a no-cost move from a duty station with a higher BAH rate to a duty station with a lower BAH rate, when the member did not move dependents.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02409-03

    Original file (02409-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board cons application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered tl opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 Ser which is attached. the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05929-02

    Original file (05929-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 September 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. IAW reference (b), payment of BAH at dependent location is A review of the petitioner's Master Military The reasons listed by - 4.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02462-02

    Original file (02462-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 September 2002. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CNO...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08675-00

    Original file (08675-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In this case the member's old PDS was not OCONUS so this article of the JFTR does not apply. 4. reassigned from a PDS in DC) and his dependents remained in the same residence as when the IAW reference (a) article U5222- member served at the old PDS.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 07440-98

    Original file (07440-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 SER of which is attached. DC 20350-200 0 IN REPLY REFER TO 722 0 Ser 30 Mar 99 N130C3/062_gg MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTIONS OF NAVAL RECORDS Via: Assistant for BCNR Matters, Pers-OOXCB Subj: REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01426-02

    Original file (01426-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 Ser attached. Enclosure (1) indicates a request to draw Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) at the w/dependent rate for Los Angeles, CA (dependent location) vice New Orleans, LA (new duty station).

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02615-02

    Original file (02615-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 September 2002. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 Ser which is attached. the following recommendation concerning Enclosure (1) indicates a request to draw Basic Allowance 2. for Housing (BAH) at the w/dependent rate for Chicago,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 02649-06

    Original file (02649-06.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 May 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05999-03

    Original file (05999-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 October 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. IAW reference (a) Secretary of defense determines BAH type I rates and locations for all members in a Military Housing Area (MHA) based on the...