DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC
20370.5100
LCC:ddj
Docket No: 5929-02
24 September 2002
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section
1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session,
considered your application on 24 September 2002. Your allegations of error and injustice were
reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 Ser N
copy of which is attached.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
13OC302UO475 of 5 September 2002, a
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
In this regard, it is important
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAV
Y
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS
2000 NAVY PENTAGON
WASHINGTON. D.C. 20350-2000
Iii!
RLPLY
IIL:, Eli
10
N130C31 02210475
7220
Ser
5 Sep
2002
MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTIONS
OF NAVAL RECORDS
Via:
Subj:
Ref:
Encl:
Assistant for BCNR Matters, Pers-OOXCB
(a) DODFMR Volume
(b) SECNAVINST 7220.82
7A, Chapter 26, Feb 00
(1) BCNR Case File
Record
#04468-02 w/Microfiche Service
Per your request, the following recommendation concerning
1.
enclosure (1) is provided.
Enclosure
2.
for Housing (BAH) at the w/dependent rate for Fullerton, CA
(dependent location) vice Camp Pendleton, CA (new duty station).
(1) indicates a request to draw Basic Allowance
IAW reference (b) provides
IAW reference (a) BAH entitlement is based on the members
3.
Permanent Duty Station (PDS).
guidelines for different situation for making determinations to
pay BAH based on the dependents location.
the petitioner do not meet the criteria delineated in reference
(b)
authorized when the need for separate residences is caused by
military necessity.
Pay Account (MMPA) revealed that he reported PCS to First Marine
Division, Camp Pendleton, CA which is his permanent duty station
BAH entitlements.
IAW reference (b), payment of BAH at dependent location is
A review of the petitioner's Master Military
The reasons listed by
-
4.
N130C recommends disapproval of the petitioner's request to
draw BAH at dependents location (Full
Assistant Head, Pay and
Allowances Section
(N130C)
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05603-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 September 2002. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 Ser of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07662-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 March 2001. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. for a member who executes a no-cost move from a duty station with a higher BAH rate to a duty station with a lower BAH rate, when the member did not move dependents.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01426-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 Ser attached. Enclosure (1) indicates a request to draw Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) at the w/dependent rate for Los Angeles, CA (dependent location) vice New Orleans, LA (new duty station).
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 04093-03
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 Ser of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 02649-06
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 May 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05159-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 July 2002. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7200 Ser which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02615-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 September 2002. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 Ser which is attached. the following recommendation concerning Enclosure (1) indicates a request to draw Basic Allowance 2. for Housing (BAH) at the w/dependent rate for Chicago,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 06094-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 October 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Enclosure (1) indicates a request to draw Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) type I at the w/dependent rate for Oakland, CA due to dependents moving...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 08239-06
8239-06 1 Nov 06Dear Petty Officer:This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 Usc 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 October 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02462-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 September 2002. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CNO...