Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05603-02
Original file (05603-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

LCC:ddj
Docket No: 5603-02
24 September 2002

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section

1552.

 

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session,
considered your application on 24 September 2002.
reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 Ser
of which is attached.

In addition, the Board considered the advisory

Your allegations of error and injustice were

 

Nl30C3/02U0472  of 28 August 2002, a copy

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Enclosure

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS

2000  NAVY PENTAGO

N

WASHINGTON. D.C. 20350-2000

HLILR 

10

72mEPLY  
Ser 
28 

Aug 2002

N130C3/02U0472

MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

OF NAVAL RECORDS

BOARD FOR CORRECTIONS

I

Via:

Assistant for BCNR Matters, Pers-OOXCB

Subi:

REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ICO

Ref:

Encl:

(a) DODFMR Volume  

7A, Chapter 26, Feb   00

(1) BCNR Case File  

Record

#05603-02  w/Microfiche Service

Per your request, the following recommendation concerning

1.
enclosure (1) is provided.

Enclosure (1) indicates a request to draw Basic Allowance

2.
for Housing (BAH) at the w/dependent rate for San Ysidro, CA
(dependent location) vice Camp Pendleton, CA (Permanent duty
station).

IAW reference (a) BAH entitlement is based on the members
A review of the petitioner's

3.
Permanent Duty Station (PDS).
Master Military Pay Account (MMPA) revealed that he reported PCS
to First Marine Division, Camp Pendleton, CA which is his
permanent duty station where his BAH was started for IAW
reference (a).

4.

N130C recommends disapproval of the petitioner's request to

draw BAH at dependents  

location (Sa

Allowances Section  

(N130C)



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05929-02

    Original file (05929-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 September 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. IAW reference (b), payment of BAH at dependent location is A review of the petitioner's Master Military The reasons listed by - 4.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05159-02

    Original file (05159-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 July 2002. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7200 Ser which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07662-00

    Original file (07662-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 March 2001. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. for a member who executes a no-cost move from a duty station with a higher BAH rate to a duty station with a lower BAH rate, when the member did not move dependents.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01426-02

    Original file (01426-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 Ser attached. Enclosure (1) indicates a request to draw Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) at the w/dependent rate for Los Angeles, CA (dependent location) vice New Orleans, LA (new duty station).

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 04093-03

    Original file (04093-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 Ser of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02615-02

    Original file (02615-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 September 2002. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 Ser which is attached. the following recommendation concerning Enclosure (1) indicates a request to draw Basic Allowance 2. for Housing (BAH) at the w/dependent rate for Chicago,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 06094-03

    Original file (06094-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 October 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Enclosure (1) indicates a request to draw Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) type I at the w/dependent rate for Oakland, CA due to dependents moving...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02462-02

    Original file (02462-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 September 2002. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CNO...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 02649-06

    Original file (02649-06.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 May 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 08239-06

    Original file (08239-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    8239-06 1 Nov 06Dear Petty Officer:This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 Usc 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 October 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and...