Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08112-01
Original file (08112-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAV

Y
FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

BOARD  

2  NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

JLP: ddj
Docket No: 
15 January 2002

8112-01

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 15 January 2002. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 Ser N  
copy of which is attached.

In addition, the Board considered the advisory

13OC3/0 1 U 1392 of 11 December 2001, a

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

In this regard, it is important
Consequently,

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF

DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAV
2000 NAVY PENTAGON

Y
  NAVAL OPERATIONS

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20350-2000

7220
Ser 
11 

Dee 

2001

N130C3/ 

OlU1392

MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION

OF 

NAdAL RECORDS

Via:

Subj:

Ref:

Encl:

Assistant for BCNR Matters,  

Pers-OOXCB

81/00
(a) Military Pay Advisory (MPA)  
(b) DOD Directive 1327.5 of 24 Sep 85

(1) BCNR Case File  

Record

#08112-01  w/Microfiche Service

Per your request, the following recommendation concerning

1.
enclosure 

(1) is provided.

3
i.

Enclosure (1) indicates a request for reinstatement of 3.5
days and 9 days leave lost at the end of FY's-99 and 00 due to
being on a very high deployment
Naval Special Warfare Unit ONE (NSWU-1).

schedule while assigned to

Defense Joint Military Pay System-Active component  

3.
AC) uses the Last-In-First-Out (LIFO) rule to determine what
IAW reference
leave is charged when a member takes leave.
(a) DFAS-Cleveland received a ruling that LIFO is the correct
method.
Effective immediately DFAS-CL will no longer make
adjustment of leave balances to minimize leave lost at the
end of the FY based on the LIFO rule.

(DJMS-

IAW reference (b)  

para. 6.16-2, service members who are

4.
assigned to a designated deployable ship, operating away from
homeport for 60 days or more,
leave when operational mission
leave utilization.
in defense of national security must have caused the
situation preventing the service

requirements prohibit normal
A national emergency/crisis or operation

members from using leave.

may accumulate up to 90 days of

Subj:

5.
refe
the petitioner's request for reinstatement of   3.5 days and 9
days leave lost at the end of

N130C recommends disapproval of

ituations are 
efore,

not, in appliance with

Assistant 

Bead, Pay and

Allowances Section  

(N130C)



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04403-01

    Original file (04403-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370.510 0 JLP:ddj Docket No: 4403-01 10 October 200 1 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title Ilnited States Code, section 10 of the 1552. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your proceedings application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02687-01

    Original file (02687-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 SER of which is attached. AC) uses the Last-In-First-Out (LIFO) rule to determine what IAW reference leave is charged when a member takes leave.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03062-01

    Original file (03062-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD X 2 NAVY ANNE S WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 JLP: ddj Docket No: 3062-01 5 September 2001 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05145-02

    Original file (05145-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive 611 24 September 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. IAW reference (b) 6.16-2, service members who are 4. assigned to a designated deployable ship, operating away from homeport for 60...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05447-03

    Original file (05447-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 October 2003. opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 Ser copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 00132-04

    Original file (00132-04.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 March 2005. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00167-02

    Original file (00167-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your allegations of error and injustice were A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 Ser N which is attached. Enclosure (1) indicates a request for retroactive payment of Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) at the w/dependent rate for vice his Permanent...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05929-02

    Original file (05929-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 September 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. IAW reference (b), payment of BAH at dependent location is A review of the petitioner's Master Military The reasons listed by - 4.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01815-01

    Original file (01815-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 JLP: ddj Docket No: 12 June 2001 1815-01 This is in reference to your applic provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. r correction of your naval record pursuant to the A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 June 200 1. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 05622-98

    Original file (05622-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 February 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...