DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

BJG
Docket No: 6283-02
9 September 2002

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To:

Secretary of the Navy

Subj: S G

REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD

Ref: (a)

Title 10 U.S.C. 1552

Encl :

(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)

DD Form 149 dtd 27 Feb 02 w/attachments
HQMC MMER memo dtd 15 Jul 02  
Memo for record dtd 27 Aug 02
HQMC MI memo dtd 11 Jul 02 less  
Memo for record dtd 28 Aug 02
Subject’s ltr dtd 8 Aug 02  
Subject ’s naval record  
.

w/encls

w/encl

encls

Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner,

1.
filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be
corrected by removing the  “adverse” comments from the fitness reports for 1 April 1996 to
28 February 1997 and 1 March to 1 June 1997, copies of which are in enclosure (1) at Tabs
In each report, he highlighted comments to which he specifically
A and B, respectively.
objected. Concerning the report for 1 April 1996 to 28 February 1997, he also objected that
item 17a (commendatory material) was marked  “No.” As indicated in enclosures (2) and  
discussed more fully at paragraph 3.b below, the Headquarters Marine Corps (HQMC)
Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB) has directed modifications to both reports.
The Board considers the HQMC PERB actions provide Petitioner full relief respecting his
fitness report record. He also requested removing the service record book page 11
(“Administrative Remarks (1070)“) counseling entries dated 21 July 1993 and
14 January 1997, copies of which are in enclosure (1) at Tabs C and D, respectively.

(3),

2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Geisler and Kim and Ms.
Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 29 August 2002, and pursuant to its
regulations, determined that the limited corrective action indicated below should be taken on
the available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

LeBlanc, reviewed

 

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner
of error and injustice, finds  

as follows:

’s allegations

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all administrative remedies

available under existing law and regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b. Enclosure 

(2), the report of the HQMC PERB in Petitioner ’s case, shows they

 1997  by removing the

directed modifying the fitness report for 1 April 1996 to 28 February
following reporting senior (RS) comment, the only RS comment Petitioner had highlighted:
“However, he displays an inconsistent application in leadership responsibilities as a Marine
NC0 [noncommissioned officer], at times outstanding in his use of force, initiative and sound
judgment, yet other times, has displayed a need for improvement in those very same
” They further directed removing the following RS comment, which Petitioner had
qualities. 
not highlighted: “With some improvements in his application of force and sound judgment
while leading Marines, he will be more than ready for greater responsibilities.
” They
directed completely removing the reviewing officer comments, only one sentence of which
Petitioner had highlighted. The memorandum for the record (MFR) at enclosure (3) shows
they finally directed amending this report by changing the entry in item 17a from 
“Yes. 
1 June 1997 by removing the following RS comments, the only comments Petitioner had
highlighted: “In the last reporting period, he was counseled for an inconsistency in his
application of sound judgment, Marine welfare, and leadership by example.
he still has a tendency to be inconsistent in his handling of enlisted personnel and applying
sound judgment.”

” Enclosure (2) further reflects that they directed modifying the report for 1 March to

“No” to

” and  “However,

C. The contested page 11 entry dated 21 July 1993 (Tab C to enclosure (1)) included

the following:

[Petitioner] 

. ..Counseled this date concerning [Petitioner ’s] refusal to continue as an
Airborne Volunteer by refusing to jump while aboard an aircraft engaged
understand[s] that action will be
in parachute operations.
taken to void [his] additional MOS [military occupational specialty] of
9962 [enlisted parachutist] and to revoke the authority to wear the
Navy/Marine Corps Parachutist Insignia. [Petitioner] was advised that
within 5 working days after acknowledgment of this entry a written rebuttal
could be submitted and that such a rebuttal will be filed on the document side
of the service record.

. 
.make such a statement. . .

[Petitioner chose] (to). 

Petitioner’s undated rebuttal stated, in pertinent part, the following:

sergeantI’s spot. Normally, on a CH [Chinook]-53

I was not manifested to jump that day, however I was slated

. ..I ADMIT that on 19 July 1993, I refused to jump during aparachute
operation.
to take [a staff  
rotary wing aircraft four Marines with combat equipment make up a stick,
but this jump was setup [sic] for five. When I boarded the aircraft at TLZ
Draining Landing Zone] Goose I informed the stick leader, [a first lieutenant]
that I felt there were unsafe conditions and would prefer not to jump.

.

2

The stick leader told me to remain seated when the GREEN light came on and
when the command STAND was to be given by the Jump Master. When the
aircraft landed I went back to my work section and informed my SNCOIC
[staff noncommissioned officer in charge] and OIC [officer in charge] that I
felt unsafe to continue as a voluntary jumper. On 21 July 1993, I was counseled
about my refusal to jump by the Company Commander [a colonel] and
transferred to 8th Communication Battalion..

 

.

d. The contested page 11 entry dated 14 January 1997 (Tab D to enclosure (I)), which

was not signed by the person who did the counseling, included the following:

defeciencies [sic]: Domestic
 

19961 when Military

[Petitioner was to] be subject of a Case Review Committee

[29 December  
 

.Counseled this date concerning the following

. , 
Disturbances. Specifically, on 961229
Police responded.
and [he was] advised to complete their recommended programs. Further
incidents of Domestic Disturbance may result in a Letter of Disposition
of Government Quarters, NJP [nonjudicial punishment] or Administrative
Separation. Assistance is available through [Petitioner
the Chaplain and Family Service Center. [He was] advised that within 5
working days of acknowledgement of this entry a written rebuttal may be
submitted and filed on the document side of [his] service record book. [He
chose] (to). 

. make such a statement.. 
. 

’s] chain of command,

.

Petitioner’s undated rebuttal stated, in pertinent part, the following:

Subsequently, the

. ..In December 1996, I failed to exercise sound judgment, when anargument
ensued after a difference of opinion with my spouse.
Military Police were alerted, and I was removed from my quarters for
that evening. There was no actual physical violence incurred to my spouse or
myself. Realizing the severity of the situation, I sought guidance from my
1stSgt [first sergeant], which [sic] counseled both my spouse and I [sic]. Days
afterwards, we voluntarily attended couples [sic] communication classes
aboard the base. These classes allowed us to reconcile our differences and
strengthen our family unity.
to my mentoring toolbox.
platoon commander/mentor to advocate and heighten junior Marines
under my charge about domestic violence.. .

Since this domestic disturbance I have added it

Furthermore, I have used this incidentas a

e. Regarding the contested page 11 entry dated 21 July 1993, Petitioner

’s application

contended that he had been justified in refusing to jump, because he had determined the
conditions to be unsafe; that he never actually lost his parachutist MOS; and that the incident
did not constitute legally sufficient grounds for voiding this MOS.

f. Concerning the page 11 entry at issue dated 14 January 1997, Petitioner

’s application

argued that after the entry had been made, the case review board found all allegations of
domestic disturbance to be  “unsubstantiated. ”In addition, he provided letters from a Marine
Corps colonel and major to the effect that this entry should be removed because the review
board made an  “unsubstantiated ” finding, and the incident did not involve domestic violence.
He also objected that the entry was not signed by his commanding officer.

g*

In correspondence at enclosure  

(4), the HQMC Manpower Information Systems Field

’s request to remove page 11

Support Branch, Manpower Management Information Systems Support Division (MI), the
office having cognizance over the subject matter of Petitioner
entries, has commented to the effect that the entry dated 21 July 1993 should be amended by
removing the following sentence:
additional MOS of 9962 and to revoke the authority to wear the Navy/Marine Corps
Parachutist Insignia. ” The reason the HQMC MI gave for removing this sentence was that
the entry in which it appears
authorization to wear the insignia is revoked.
relief by drawing a  “thin-inked [sic] ” line through the sentence. They concluded that the
remainder of the entry should stand, as the amended entry properly documents that Petitioner
received counseling for his admitted refusal to jump.

‘I...does not state the authority for termination and whether the
 

“I understand that action will be taken to void my

”They further recommended accomplishing this

h. The HQMC MI opinion at enclosure (4) concluded that the entry dated

14 January 1997 should stand. They concluded that the entry properly documents Petitioner
counseling for an incident where he admitted a failure to exercise sound judgment; and they
noted that the applicable directive did not specify the commander must sign a page 11 entry.

’s

i.

The MFR at enclosure (5) documents that a member of the Board

’s staff contacted

the HQMC MI to clarify their advisory opinion at enclosure (4) as it relates to the contested
page 11 entry dated 21 July 1993. The MFR shows they stated that the basis for their
recommendation to remove a sentence from this entry was not only that it failed to state the
authority for revoking Petitioner ’s MOS and right to wear the insignia, but also that the
sentence is factually incorrect. The MFR further shows they felt that completely obliterating
the sentence would be a more appropriate remedy than merely drawing a line through it, as
they had previously recommended.

j-

By his letter at enclosure  

(6), Petitioner resubmitted the two officers

’ statements

concerning the incident that resulted in the contested page 11 entry dated 14 January 1997,
together with a new statement from his wife.
argument  “about the amount of time he spent doing things for himself,
their two young children.
that Petitioner was told to leave their base quarters for the night.
Petitioner would soon be celebrating their 1 l-year wedding anniversary; and that since the
incident, they had  “made an addition ” to their family.

She stated that she and Petitioner had an

She said that a  “concerned party ” called the military police, and

She noted that she and

” leaving her to tend

CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and in substantial concurrence
with the HQMC MI opinion at enclosure  
finds an error and injustice warranting limited relief. Specifically, they find that the contested
page 11 entry dated 21 July 1993 should be revised by removing, in such a way that it cannot
be read, the sentence  “I understand that action will be taken to void my additional MOS of
9962 and to revoke the authority to wear the Navy/Marine Corps Parachutist Insignia.
”

(4), revised as indicated in enclosure  

(5), the Board

In finding that the page 11 entry dated 14 January 1997 should stand, the Board notes that
Petitioner’s rebuttal clarifies the circumstances of the situation. In addition, they find the
subsequent case review committee determination that the case was  “unsubstantiated” did not
establish there had been no domestic disturbance. To the contrary, the statement from
Petitioner’s wife substantiates that an argument resulting in military police intervention did
occur

.

.

In view of the above, the Board directs the following limited corrective action.

RECOMMENDATION:

a. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected by removing from the service record page
“I

11 ( “Administrative Remarks (1070)“) entry dated 21 July 1993 the following sentence: 
understand that action will be taken to ’void my additional MOS of 9962 and to revoke the
authority to wear the Navy/Marine Corps Parachutist Insignia. ” This is to be effected by
reconstructing the page 11 on which the entry appears, or completely obliterating the sentence
to be removed so it cannot be read, rather than merely drawing a line through it.

b. That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating to the Board

recommendation be corrected, removed or completely expunged from Petitioner
that no such entries or material be added to the record in the future.

’s
’s record and

C. That any material directed to be removed from Petitioner ’s naval record be returned

to the Board, together with a copy of this Report of Proceedings, for retention in a
confidential file maintained for such purpose, with no cross reference being made a part of
Petitioner’s naval record.

d. That the remainder of Petitioner ’s request be denied.

4.
Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that a quorum was
present at the Board
record of the Board ’s proceedings in the above entitled matter.

’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Recorder

-JONATHAN  S.  
Acting Recorder

RUSKIN

Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of

5.
the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section
723.6(e)) and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference (a), has been approved by
the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV

HEADOUAATERS  UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS

3280 RUSSELL ROA

D

QUANTICO, VIRGINIA 221 34-51 0

Y

3

161 0
MMER
15  Jul  02

MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF

NAVAL RECORDS

Subj:

Encl:

ASE OF 

SERGEA

(1) Copy of CMC  
(2) CMC Advisory Opinion 1070 MI of 11

MMER/PERB  of 19 Jun 02
Jul 02

ltr 1610 

1.
Sergant
970228

As evidenced by enclosure  

(l), PERB effected corrections to
fitness reports for the periods 960401 to
1 to 970601 (TR).

We defer to BCNR on the issue of Sergeant

2.
request for the removal of Page 11 entries.
furnished to assist in resolving that matter.

En

Evaluation

Review Branch
Personnel Management Division
By direction of the Commandant
of the Marine Corps

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

HEAOOUARTERS  UNITED STATES MARINE CORP

S

3280 RUSSELL ROA
PUANTICO. VIRGINIA 22134.510

D

3

From :
To:

SMC

Subj:

CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

Ref:

(a) Your Application for Correction to Military Record'

(DD Form 149) of   27 Feb 02
MC0 

1610.11c

(b) 

1.

This responds to your request contained in reference (a).

Per the provisions of reference (b), the Performance

2.
Evaluation Review Board has reviewed allegations of error and
injustice in your naval record.

liaving reviewed all the facts of record, the Board has
3.
directed that the fitness-reports identified below will be
modified as indicated:

a.

960401-970228 (AN).

(1) Removal of the following comments from Section C:

\\However, he displays an inconsistent application in
responsibilities as a Marine
use of force,
displayed a need for improvement in those very same qualities."
an d "With some improvements in his application of force and
sound judgment while leading Marines,
for greater responsibilities."

  NCO , at times outstanding in his

initiative and sound judgment, yet other times has

he will be more than ready

  leadership

(2) Removal of the Reviewing Officer

entirety.

’s remarks

 in thei

r

b .

(TR) .

970301-970601 

Removal of the following comments
"In the last reporting period he was counseled

from Section C:
for an inconsistency in his application of sound judgment,
Marine welfare,
still has a tendency to be in consistent in  
enlisted personnel and applying sound judgment."

and leadership by example."   and "However, he
his handling of

'L

4.
Since your request to remove page 11 entries from your
Service Record Book does not fall under the purview of this

Subj:

CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

Headquarters,
for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR)
Additional inquiries should be made directly to that
(703) 614-9851

your application is being forwarded to the
  for final resolution

.

 

agency  at

  Board

.

dicection

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS (BCNR)

PERFORMANCE SECTION
2 NAVY ANNEX, SUITE 2432
WASHINGTON, DC 20370-5100

TELEPHONE: (703) 614-2293 OR DSN 224-2293
FACSIMILE: (703) 614-9857 OR DSN 224-9857

DOCKET NO: 6283-02

PETITIONER (PET)

PARTY CALLED

TELEPHONE #:

USMC

WHAT I SAID: I ASKED DAHRIE IF SHE AGREED THAT IN PET
lAPR96-28FEB97,  THE COMM COR BLK SHOULD BE MARKED 

’S 

FITREP FOR
“YES” V “NO”.

WHAT PARTY SAID: SHE AGREED, AND SAID THAT SHE WOULD DIRECT AN
ADMIN CHANGE ACCORDINGLY.

@&bdTAqI
BRIAN J. GEORGE

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORP

S

3280 RUSSELL ROA

D

OUANTICO.  VIRGINIA 22134-510

3

IN REPLY REFER TO:

1070

MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE
NAVAL RECORDS

DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF

Subj:

Encl:

BCNR APPLICATION IN THE CASE OF

SMC

SERGE

(1) Copy of  

Sergea
for Page 11 en

for Page 11 entry dated 970114

(2) Copy of 

Sergean

Rebuttal Statement

Rebuttal Statement

Serge&

We reviewed  

1.
his request for removal
NAVMC 
service records.

application concerning
trative Remarks (1070)
118(11)  page 11 entries dated 930721 and 970114 from his

MC0 

P1070.12H, Marine Corps Individual Records

2.
Administration Manual  
entries on page 11 which are considered matters forming an
essential and permanent part of a Marine's military history,
which are not recorded elsewhere in the Service Record Book
(SRB), medical records, or the Marine's automated record and
will be useful to future commanders.

(IRAMJ, authorizes commanders to make

MC0 

P1080.35H,  Marine Corps Total Force System Personnel

3.
Reporting Instructions Manual (MCTFSPRIM) provides guidance in
reporting incentive pay for hazardous duty involving parachuting
duty.

MC0 

P1000.6F, Assignment, Classification, and Travel Systems

4.
Manual (ACTS MANUAL) provides guidance in the assignment,
revocation, and termination of assignment to duty involving
parachuting duty.

MC0 P1752.3,

Marine Corps Family Advocacy Program Standing

5.
Operating Procedures (FAP SOP),
information on the operation of the Marine Corps' Family
Advocacy Program and sets forth policies and procedures for
holding offenders accountable for their behavior through
administrative or disciplinary action, and rehabilitation,
where/when 

provides commanders with

appropria&.

Subj:

SERGEAN

OF 
SMC

Marine Corps policy is that reasonable efforts at

One of the many leadership tools that a commander has at

6.
their disposal is counseling and rehabilitation for their
Marines.
rehabilitation should be made prior to initiation of separation
proceedings and that the commander is authorized to document
IRAM.
those efforts by a page 11 counseling entry per the  
Marine Corps Separation Manual, paragraph 6105, sets forth
policy pertaining to counseling and rehabilitation.
In cases
involving unsatisfactory performance, pattern of misconduct, or
other bases requiring counseling under paragraph 6105,
separation processing may not be initiated until the Marine is
counseled concerning deficiencies, and afforded a reasonable
opportunity to overcome those deficiencies as reflected in
appropriate counseling and personnel records.

The

MC0 1610.12, the U.S.

7.
states that:

Marine Corps Counseling Program

a.

"Counseling is that part of leadership which ensures, by

mutual understanding,
Marines are continuously directed toward increased unit
readiness and effective individual performance.

that the efforts of leaders and their

b.

Increase individual performance and productivity through

counseling and thereby increases unit readiness and
effectiveness.

C .

Counseling enhances the leader's ability to improve the

junior's performance."

The following comments/opinions concerning the page 11 entry

8.
dated 930721 are provided:

L commander

a.

for duty involving

The entry appears that Sergeant
counseled him concerning qualifications
parachuting duty after he refused to participate in parachuting.
Assignment of this duty involves specific qualifications after
completion of an approved basic parachuting course and issuance
of orders to engage in parachuting duty per paragraph 1205 of
the ACTS MANUAL.
are entitled to a monthly monetary incentive and/or special pay
and this information must be reported on the Unit Diary per the
MCTFSPRIM.
Parachutist Insignia.

Addition&Lly, Marines are eligible to wear the  

Marines assigned to duty involving  

parchuting

Basic

2

Subj:

LICATION IN,

CASE OF SERGE

SMC

F"'

b.

Marines entitled to the monthly monetary incentive
and/or special pay must meet a certain level of proficiency
maintenance requirements to remain eligible to receive this
The page 11 entry appears to be the commander's attempt
Pay.
to follow procedures set forth in paragraph 1207.2 of the ACTS
MANUAL where an entry on the Administrative Remarks page 11 is
required when a Marine's assignment is revoked.
The page 11
entry does not state the authority for termination and whether
the authorization to wear the insignia is revoked.
However
Sergeant
Apr 02 t
later.
Sergean
Volunteer parachutist and paragraph 1207 of the ACTS MANUAL
supports the  
personnel to parachuting duty when the Marine is transferred to
a duty that no longer requires parachuting.

tates in his letter 1070 BCNR dated 10
ansferred to another organization one week

The subsequent transfer appears to be the result of

commande;'s  decision to cancel the orders assigning

refusal to continue as an Airborne

,

C .

Serge

enclosure (1) above, that he did
parachute operation."

states in his rebuttal statement,

"refused to jump during a

d.

Paragraph 4012 of the  

IRAM provides guidance in the

preparation of a page 11 entry if a Marine has been terminated
from the assignment to duty involving parachuting.
With the
exception of the sentence
taken to void my additional MOS of 9962 and to revoke the
authority to wear the Navy/Marine Corps Parachutist Insignia.",
the page 11 entry is an authorized entry per paragraph 4012
of the 

"I understand that action will be

IRAM.

e.

Sergean

ates that the page 11 entry is in

error or unjust because they are
due process" is not supported by the ACTS MANUAL and the  

"unsubstantiated as a result of

IRAM.

f.

Sergeant

commander determined that the

information contained in the page 11 entry was of permanent
value to his career,
thereby documenting this event per the
provisions of the  

IRAM.

9.

Sergean
procedur

proper 
documenting those  

commander appears to have followed
IRAM in
actions by the preparation of a page 11 entry.

by the ACTS MANUAL and the  

3

Subj:

BCNR APPLICATION IN THE CASE OF

USMC

SERGEAN

The following comments/opinions concerning the page 11 entry

9.
dated 970114 are provided:

a.

The counseling entry meets the elements of a proper page

11 counseling in that it lists specific deficiencies and
recommendations for corrective action, where assistance can be
found and states that the Marine was provided the opportunity to
make a rebuttal statement.
an opportunity to annotate whether or not he chose to make
a statement and if made,
in the service record.

a copy of the statement would be filed

Additionally, the entry affords him

 

such.

b.

Sergean
his signature a
statement in rebuttal that is included as enclosure (2) above.

acknowledged the counseling entry by
dicated  his desire  

"to" make a

C .

Sergeant
sound judgement i
entry.

acknowledges his failure to exercise
ed rebuttal statement to the page 11

d.

is irrelevant and not supported by the  

claims that his records are in error
age 11 entry
"was never signed by my

Sergean
or are unjust b
Commanding Officer"
The failure of the commander to sign the page 11 entry does not
negate those actions taken by the commander, nor nullify a valid
entry authorized by the  
Paragraph 4012 of the  
requires that the Marine acknowledge (sign) the page 11
counseling entry attesting to the fact that he was counseled,
even though he may not agree with the contents of the entry.
IRAM did not specifically state that the
This version of the  
Additionally, Sergeant

t  sign the page   11  entry.
rebuttal statement does not address this issue nor
e the contents of the page 11 entry.

IRAM.

IRAM

IRAM.

e.

Sergean

s commander followed the guidelines

contained in the paragraph 1002 of the FAP SOP which states in
part commanders are encouraged to hold offenders accountable for
their actions through appropriate counseling and administrative
and/or disciplinary action.
counseling and administrative action.

The page 11 entry is an appropriate

f.

Sergean

information 
value to his career,
provisions of the  

contained,in the
thereby

IRAM.

'commander determined that the
page 11  entry was of permanent  
documenting this event per the

-

4

Subj:

F SERGE
MC

10.

In view of the above,

it is recommended that:

a.

The Board for Correction of Naval Records disapprove

Sergeant
Remarks (1070) NAVMC 
970114 from his service records.

s request for removal of the Administrative
118(11) page 11 entries dated 930721 and

b.

The Board for Correction of Naval Records authorize a

Sergean

partial relief by allowing a pen change method of correction
to 
sentence
additional MOS of 9962 and to revoke the authority to wear the
Navy/Marine Corps Parachutist Insignia." from the page 11 entry
dated 930721 by drawing a thin-inked line through the sentence.

"I understand that action will be taken to void my

service records by deleting the

for Correction of Naval Records finds that
records are in error or an injustice was

approve the removal of the Administrative Remarks
(1070) NAVMC  
118(11) page 11 entries dated 930721 and 970114
along with the rebuttal statements from his service records.

11.

Point of contact

Systems Field Support Branch,
Manpower Management Information
Systems Support Division

5