Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00050-02
Original file (00050-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
X

2 NAVY ANNE

Y

S

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

LCC: ddj
Docket 
No: 50-02
10 September 2002

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session,
considered your application on 10 September 2002.
reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 Ser
which is attached.

In addition, the Board considered the advisory

Your allegations of error and injustice were

 

N130C3/02U0256 of 28 May 2002, a copy of

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Consequently,

’

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

I

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATION

S

2000 NAVY PENTAGO

N

WASHINGTON, D.C.

 

20350-2000

’”

0

**

7

LY

 

REP

HI.kER

 

 

TO

N130C3/02U0256

Ser 
28  May  2002

MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION

OF NAVAL RECORDS

Via:

Subj:

F:ef:

Assistant for BCNR Matters, Pers-OOXCB

(a) SECNAVINST 
1500.8A
7A,  Chapter   60, Feb
(b) DODFMR Volume  
(c) Joint Federal Travel Regulations,

02
Volume 1

E:nc 1 :

(1) BCNR Case File  

Record

#00050

-02

 w/Microfiche Service

.

Per your request,

1 
enclosure (1) is provided.

the following recommendation concerning

Enclosure (1) indicates a request for Dislocation Allowance

2 .
l(DLA) and Temporary Lodging Expense
travel expenses incurred.

(TLE) to be compensated for

The petitioner was selected and enrolled in the

Verification of the petitioner's service record microfiche

3 .
Statement of Service (SOS) document revealed that the member
enlisted and served in the Navy on active duty from
to 11 June 1997.
Armed Forces Health Professions Scholarship Program (AFHPS) from
IAW reference (a), members seeking
12 June 1997 to 6 June 2001.
appointment to be designated as medical officer who are on active
duty as an officer must resign their commission, or as an
enlisted person must request a discharge from active duty.
those individuals are appointed as commissioned officers in the
Reserve Components and detailed to civilian institutions for
training in a health profession.

  26 April 1989

Then

Subj:

IAW reference (b) members enrolled in this program will be

4.
ordered to active duty for periods of 45 days each year of
participation in the program.
required to serve on
participating in the program.
participants incur an active duty obligation of a 3-year term of
service on active duty.

active duty for any other period while

In no case shall any member be

Upon completion of the program

para.

U5705-C, there is no DLA entitlement

IAW reference (c),  

5 .
in connection with a PCS from the last PDS in one period of
service to the first PDS in another period of service when there
was no ordered PCS between those stations.
reference (c)  
when entering active duty to the first PDS for officer members
A review of
with orders issued on or after 1 January
enclosure 
April 2001.

revealed that the petitioner's order was issued

In addition, per

  2002.

para. 

U5705 Note:

TLE is payable incident to a move

(l),

6. Therefore,
request for payment due to the petitioner
and TLE IAW Reference (c).

N130E recommends disapproval of the petitioner's

is not eligible for DLA

Allowances Section  

(N130E)



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02404-01

    Original file (02404-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 June 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08708-01

    Original file (08708-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-n~ember panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application o n 14 May 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereol', your naval record arid applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05594-02

    Original file (05594-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 Ser of which is attached. appropriate housing allowance in these circumstances.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00118-03

    Original file (00118-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 October 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08675-00

    Original file (08675-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In this case the member's old PDS was not OCONUS so this article of the JFTR does not apply. 4. reassigned from a PDS in DC) and his dependents remained in the same residence as when the IAW reference (a) article U5222- member served at the old PDS.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 01763-04

    Original file (01763-04.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 May 2004. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 01766-04

    Original file (01766-04.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 May 2004. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00167-02

    Original file (00167-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your allegations of error and injustice were A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 Ser N which is attached. Enclosure (1) indicates a request for retroactive payment of Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) at the w/dependent rate for vice his Permanent...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06994-01

    Original file (06994-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your allegations of error and injustice were A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. your naval record and III addition, the Board considered the advisory nlemorandum 7220 Ser N 130C3/021.10071 of 2 I February 2002, a CNO After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05159-02

    Original file (05159-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 July 2002. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7200 Ser which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.