Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04403-01
Original file (04403-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370.510

0

JLP:ddj
Docket No: 4403-01
10 October 200 1

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title  

Ilnited States Code, section  

10 of the  

1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 10 October 200 1 . Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
of.this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
proceedings 
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by 
copy of which is attached.

In addition, the Board considered the advisory

CNO memorandum 7220 SER N 

IJ 1269 of 24 September 2001, a

13OC3/0 1 

subluitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
evidence 
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory   opinion.
  The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

  record, the  Board found that the

Accordingly, your application

has been denied.

 

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are  
You are entitled to   have the  
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all ofticial records. Consequently,
on the applicant to
when applying for a correction of an ofticial naval record, the burden is
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

upon submission of new and material
In this regard, it is important

such that favorable action cannot be taken.

Roard reconsider its decision  

 

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

OFFICE OF

DEPARTMENT OF THE

  NAV Y

  THE CHIEF
2000 NAVY
WASHINGTON. 

  OF  NAVAL  OPERATION
  PENTAGO
DC.  

20350-2000

N

S

IN  REPLY REFER TO
7220
Ser 
24 Sep 2001

N130C3/01u1269

MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION

OF NAVAL RECORDS

Via :

Assistant  for BCNR   Matters.,  Pers-OOXC

B

Subj:

Ref:

TIONS ICO

(a) OPNAVINST 
(b) DODFMR, Volume  
(c) Military Pay Advisory (MPA)  

1560.8A  of 2 Feb 1990

7A, Chapter 35, February  

81/00

2001

Encl:

(1) BCNR Case File 

Record

#04403-01  w/Microfiche Service

Per your request,

the following recommendation concerning

1 .
enclosure 

(1) is provided.

2.
Enclosure (1) indicates a request for reinstatement of 22
that was lost at the end of FY 00 to sell back upon accepting
commissioning in the Enlisted Education Advancement Program
(EEAP).

days
an

3. A review of enclosure (1) revealed that the petitioner had
accepted orders to participate in the Enlisted Commissioning
In accordance with reference (a) selectee
Program (ECP).
enrolling in Enlisted Education Advancement Program (EEAP) will be
obligated six years of service commencing prior to transferring to
administrative command.
Enlisted member in the status of
above and will receive full pay and allowances and may compete for
advancement.

petty officer third class or

Selectee will remain on active duty as an

 

4. Upon completion of the program the Officer Candidate will be
administratively discharged and will convert from enlisted to
officer status without a break in military service to accept a
commission.
is discharged under honorable conditions is entitled to payment of
unused accrued leave unless the member continues on active duty
under conditions which require accrued to be carried forward.

paragraph 350101(A) a member who

IAW reference (b),

REQUEST

FOR COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ICO

5. Defense Joint Military Pay System-Active component (DJMS-AC)
uses the Last-In-First-Out (LIFO) rule to determine what leave is
charged when a member uses leave.
received a ruling that LIFO is the correct method and effective
immediately DFAS-CL will no longer make adjustment of leave
balances to minimize leave lost at the end of the FY based
LIFO rule.

 

IAW reference C, DFAS-Cleveland

on  the

She will be converted from enlisted to officer status

6. In this case the petitioner will not be discharged from the
service.
without a break in military service.
disapproval of the petitioner's request to sell back 22 days LSL
IAW references (b) and for reinstatement of 22 days that was lost
at the end of FY 00 IAW reference (c).

Therefore,

N130C  recommends

Allowances Section  

(N130C)

Pay and



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05447-03

    Original file (05447-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 October 2003. opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 Ser copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02687-01

    Original file (02687-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 SER of which is attached. AC) uses the Last-In-First-Out (LIFO) rule to determine what IAW reference leave is charged when a member takes leave.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08112-01

    Original file (08112-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 January 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. AC) uses the Last-In-First-Out (LIFO) rule to determine what IAW reference leave is charged when a member takes leave.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03062-01

    Original file (03062-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD X 2 NAVY ANNE S WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 JLP: ddj Docket No: 3062-01 5 September 2001 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05145-02

    Original file (05145-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive 611 24 September 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. IAW reference (b) 6.16-2, service members who are 4. assigned to a designated deployable ship, operating away from homeport for 60...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 00132-04

    Original file (00132-04.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 March 2005. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 06905-98

    Original file (06905-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Enclosure (1) does not contain evidence to support the 4. petitioner's claim that an administrative oversight...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00167-02

    Original file (00167-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your allegations of error and injustice were A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 Ser N which is attached. Enclosure (1) indicates a request for retroactive payment of Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) at the w/dependent rate for vice his Permanent...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08158-00

    Original file (08158-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 SER of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01509-01

    Original file (01509-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 SER which is attached. D.C. 20350-200 N 0 IN REPLY REFER TO 7220 Ser 9 May 2001 N130C/oiu0195 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Via: Assistant for BCNR Matters,...