DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370.510
0
JLP:ddj
Docket No: 3407-01
30 October 2001
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title
IJnited States Code, section
10 of the
1552.
30 October 200 1
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by CNP
of which is attached.
sublnitted in support thereof, your naval record and
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
mtmorandum 7220 Ser N
. Your allegations of error and injustice
13OC310 1
II 1289 of 4 October 2001, a copy
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will he furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of
lm~l~able material error or injustice.
In this regard, it is important
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
OF NAVAL OPERATION
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF
2000 NAVY PENTAGO
N
WASHINGTON. D.C.
20350*2000
S
IN REPLY REFER TO
7220
SerN130C3/01u1289
4
Ott 2001
MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTIONS
OF NAVAL RECORDS
Via :
Assistant for BCNR Matters, Pers-OOXC
B
Subj:
REQUEST
FOR COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ICO
Ref:
Encl:
(a) Electronic Military Personnel Records System (EMPRS-98)
(b) U.S.C., Title 37, 501
( 1 ) BCNR Case File
Record
#03407-01 w/Microfiche Service
*
x,
Per your request,
1.
enclosure (1) is provided.
the following recommendation concerning
2. Enclosure (1) indicates a request
for correction of his Master
Military Pay Account (MMPA) to show that he never sold back 15
days of lump sum leave (LSL) during his
upon his discharge and transfer to Fleet Reserve on 1 April 2001.
(20 years) military career
3. A review of the petitioner's Master Military Pay Account (MMPA)
revealed he sold back 15 days LSL.
(Page 13 entry) revealed a signature on file for a cash
of 15 days LSL effective 2 March 1985 while assigned to USS CARL
VINSON (CVN 70).
45 days of LSL where sold back which made a total of 60 days at
his separation (1 Apr 01).
during a military career is
The maximum LSL a member can sell back
60 days IAW reference (b).
Upon his transfer to fleet reserve the remaining
Reference (a) NAVPERS
1070/613
settlement
4.
N130C recommends disapproval of the petitioner's request for
correction of his MMPA to reflect that he never sold back those 15
days LSL.
To be eligible to sell 15 days of LSL, the petitioner
would have to submit proof those days were
his military career.
i
n$&&&&J&
1 back during
Allowances Section
(N130C)
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03793-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 SER of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04095-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 Ser which is attached. MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTIONS OF NAVAL RECORDS Assistant for BCNR Matters, Pers-OOXCB Via: Subj: .
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 08935-05
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 March 2005. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 01601-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 February 1999. Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATION Y S WASHINGTON. the following recommendation concerning The petitioner is requesting reimbursement of pay and 2 .
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08722-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2998. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After careful review of all the information brought forward, N130C recommends BCNR disapprove petitioners request for full pay and allowances for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 02912-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 February 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 which is attached.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04403-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370.510 0 JLP:ddj Docket No: 4403-01 10 October 200 1 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title Ilnited States Code, section 10 of the 1552. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your proceedings application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08158-00
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 SER of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 06178-04
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNQ memorandum 7220 N130C4/04U0703 dated 30 September 2004, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. A review of the petitioner’s Master Military Pay Account (NMPA) indicates that he had sold back 46 days of leave prior to 28 Apr 00.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02104-00
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 N of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Enclosure (1) indicates a request to reinstate all pay and allowances due to a negative leave balance that occurred during the petitioner's continuation of active duty for special work orders with less than 24 hours...