Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04610-06
Original file (04610-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

                                                      
                                             SRB
                                                                                           Docket No: 4610-06
                                                                                          7 Sep 06


From:    Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To:      Secretary of the Navy
Subj
 REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD
Ref:     (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552
En cl :    (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
 (2)      NPC memo 1160 Ser 4811/458 dated 21 Jul 06
(3)      Subject’s naval record
1.       Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected show she reenlisted vice extended, and to establish entitlement to a zone “A 1 ’ Location Selective Reenlistment Bonus (LSRB).
2.       The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Koman, and Ms. Gilbert, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 6 Septe~er 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
3.       The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:
a.       Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations within the Department of the Navy.
b.       In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner’s application has commented to the effect that the request has merit and warrants favorable action.


Docket No. 4610-06 CONCLUSION
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action.
RECONNENDAT ION
That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that:
a. The 27 month NAVPERS 1070/621 extension agreement, operat~ive on or about 12 February 2004, is cancelled.
b.       The 12 month NAVPERS 1070/621 extension agreement, of 5 April 2006, is null and void.
c.       She was discharged and reenlisted on 7/8 February 2004 for 4 ears. Per NAVADMIN 301/02, this change will entitle Petiti o ner to a zone “A” LSRB with an award level of 1.0 for UIC 0763A.
d.       A copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed in Petiti o ner’s naval record.
4. Pu r suant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board or Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regula t ions, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was presen t at the Board’s review and deliberations, and that the forego i ng is a true and complete record of the Board’s procee d ings in the above entitled matter.
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN        WILLIAM J. HESS, II
Record   Acting Recorder

5.       pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) f the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 72 3.6(e)) and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference (a) , has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

7 September 2006

                                            
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00040-06

    Original file (00040-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS2 NAVY ANNEXWASHINGTON DC 20370-5100MEHDocket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “C” Location Selective Reenlistment Bonus (LSRB) for UIC 0763A.2 The Board consisting of reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 28...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06247-06

    Original file (06247-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB).2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Frankfurt, Mr. Geisler, and Mr. Leernan, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 October 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 05336-05

    Original file (05336-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    5336-05 20 September 2005From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the NavySubj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICORef: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Location Selective Reenlistment Bonus (LSRB) for UIC 0763A.2. The Board, consisting of Messrs....

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10535-06

    Original file (10535-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB).2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Leeman, and Mr. Chapman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on •24 April 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06243-06

    Original file (06243-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “C” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB).2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Frankfurt, Mr. Geisler, and Mr. Leeman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 October 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05840-06

    Original file (05840-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus(SRB).2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Frankfurt, Mr. Geisler, and Mr. Leeman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 October 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03464-06

    Original file (03464-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B” selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB).2. The 20 month NAVPERS 1070/621 extension agreement, operative on or about 14 June 2006, is null and void. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 02944-07

    Original file (02944-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “C” Location Selective Reenlistment Bonus (LSRB) for UIC 0763A.2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Ivins, Ms. Guill, and Ms. McCormick, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 19 June 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04289-06

    Original file (04289-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB).2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Frankfurt, Mr. Geisler, and Mr. Leeman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 October 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 05137-10

    Original file (05137-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    5137-10 19 Jan 11 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj]: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). The 3 year reenlistment executed on or about 10 February 2006 is...